Search Results

1. Koso v Chief Executive Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment [2014] NZHRRT 39 [pdf, 133 KB]

   ...recognised in ss 27 and 29 of the Act. The information may need to be carefully checked before sending it to the requester to make sure that the redactions are correct or that information about others has not been inadvertently included. Physical files may need to be brought from remote locations. [5] The Privacy Act does not set a fixed time for providing access to the information. Instead, s 66(4) states that it is an interference with privacy if access is “unduly delayed” and i...

2. ENV-2020-AKL-000090

   Appeal ENV-2020-AKL-000090 Waikato River Authority v Waikato Regional Council s274 interested parties Auckland/Waikato Fish and Game Council Beef+Lamb New Zealand Limited Dairy NZ Limited Federated Farmers of New Zealand Fonterra Co-operative Group Limited G Pinnell Graeme Gleeson Hamilton City Council Horticulture New Zealand Mercury NZ Limited OJI Fibre Solutions NZ Limited Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand Incorporated Waikato River and Waipa River Iwi Wairakei Pastoral

   Located in:

   1. Environment Court >
   2. Environment Court cases online >
   3. Waikato Regional Council Plan Change 1

3. [2022] NZACC 81 – Rogan v ACC (6 May 2022) [pdf, 171 KB]

   ...application for review of the Corporation’s decision of 4 March 2019 suspending Ms Rogan’s entitlement to weekly compensation. [2] On 3 March 2020, Judge Henare issued an Initial Minute which directed that Ms Rogan formally apply for leave to file the appeal out of time and set out the reasons why the appeal was filed late. 2 [3] Ms Rogan does not appear to have formally applied for leave to file the appeal out of time setting out the reasons why the appeal was filed late....

4. Cue v Accident Compensation Corporation (Late filing to the District Court) [2024] NZACC 126 (24 July 2024) [pdf, 148 KB]

   ...AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Judgment on the papers. Submissions: J Angus Burney for the Appellant S Arnold for the Respondent Date of Judgment: 24 July 2024 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE P R SPILLER [Late filing of an appeal to the District Court – s 151, Accident Compensation Act 2001] Introduction [1] The appeal in the above matter was lodged by Mr Cue on 24 June 2024, but the Authority to Act was filed on 26 June 2024. The appeal is fr...

5. LCRO 215/2018 WN v ZD (31 October 2019) [pdf, 162 KB]

   ...[3] They engaged ABC Limited (ABC) to carry out repairs on the home. [4] Mr and Mrs WN were not happy with the quality of ABC’s workmanship. [5] They were not prepared to pay for work completed as they considered it to be substandard. [6] ABC filed summary judgment proceedings in the District Court. 2 [7] Ms ZD was instructed to defend the summary judgment application. Ms ZD was a solicitor employed by the law firm [law firm]. [8] A defended hearing was scheduled to proceed...

6. What to expect from a legal aid audit [pdf, 177 KB]

   ...expectations. This fact sheet gives you an overview of our audit programme and what to expect when you are audited. There are two types of audit - limited or full audit. • A limited audit involves Ministry staff checking five of your files against expectations set in the practice standards. • A full audit involves an auditor, who is an experienced legal aid provider, checking the quality of the legal representation you provide to legal aid clients. Sending us yo...

7. [2017] NZEmpC 46 Davidson v Great Barrier Airlines Ltd [pdf, 104 KB]

   ...determinations of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for security for costs BETWEEN ANNA DAVIDSON Plaintiff AND GREAT BARRIER AIRLINES LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the papers filed on 27 March, 19, 20 and 28 April 2017 Appearances: G Bennett, advocate for plaintiff M Robins, counsel for defendant Judgment: 5 May 2017 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE M E PERKINS Backgroun...

8. [2023] NZIACDT 8 - BC v Murthy (22 March 2023) [pdf, 236 KB]

   ...REPRESENTATION: Registrar: Self-represented Complainant: Self-represented Adviser: Self-represented 2 PRELIMINARY [1] The complainant, BC, consulted the adviser, Nirmala Krishna Murthy, concerning obtaining residence. He alleges she filed a type of application which Immigration New Zealand (Immigration NZ) was not then processing, did not communicate with him and did not refund any of her fee when he terminated the engagement. [2] A complaint by the complainant against...

9. [2013] NZEmpC 199 Sealord Group Ltd v Pickering [pdf, 44 KB]

   ...2013, and a concern that counsel for the plaintiff did not raise any objection as to timeliness at that time. The first point is that as at 9 October 2013 the statement of defence was not out of time. The second point is that the timeframes for filing are imposed under the Regulations and it is not for the parties to agree or otherwise to filing out of time. If out of time an appropriate application must be advanced seeking leave of the Court. That requirement cannot be waived by...

10. [2013] NZEmpC 192 Gupta v Infosys Technologies (Australia) Pty Ltd [pdf, 113 KB]

    ...Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for an order striking out amended statement of claim BETWEEN NEEL GUPTA Plaintiff AND INFOSYS TECHNOLOGIES (AUSTRALIA) PTY LIMITED Defendant Hearing: (by memorandum filed on 25 September 2013 and 9 October 2013) Representation: Gregory Bennett, advocate for the plaintiff John Rooney, counsel for the defendant Judgment: 18 October 2013 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE A D FORD Int...