Search Results

1. [2018] NZEmpC 137 Lyttelton Port Company Ltd v Pender [pdf, 189 KB]

   ...137 (substantive); Pender v Lyttelton Port Co Ltd [2018 NZERA Christchurch 161 (costs). held on interest-bearing deposit pending the outcome of the challenge. Any release is to be at the direction of the Court. (c) The plaintiff will file an amended statement of claim incorporating a challenge to the costs determination within the applicable timeframe for doing so.2 (d) The parties will pursue the challenge(s) with all reasonable diligence. [2] There will be no order fo...

2. SS v Secretary for Justice [2021] NZRA 001 (4 June 2021) [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...approved by the Secretary. The condition for supervision was to be reassessed at the end of the two year period. [4] The Applicant has sought a review of the Secretary’s decision to impose a supervision condition. [5] The Applicant has filed one hundred and ten pages of submissions, case references and references from practitioners in support of his application for review. [6] By letter of 2 June 2021, the Secretary has advised the Authority that the references from profe...

3. [2021] NZEmpC 194 Henry v South Waikato Achievement Trust [pdf, 152 KB]

   ...v South Waikato Achievement Trust [2021] NZERA 387 (Member Arthur). 3 At [31]. [3] Ms Henry has challenged both determinations and applied for a stay of execution of the Authority’s costs determination. [4] A joint memorandum was filed seeking the stay by consent. I am satisfied that the application for a stay can be granted and, by consent, ordered accordingly. Execution of the Authority’s costs determination is stayed pending further order of the Court. [5] Cos...

4. [2021] NZEmpC 164 Alkazaz v Enterprise IT Ltd [pdf, 117 KB]

   ...NZEmpC 164 [29 September 2021] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2021] NZEmpC 164 EMPC 100/2021 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to extend time to file a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for security for costs BETWEEN AHMED ALKAZAZ Applicant AND ENTERPRISE IT LIMITED Respondent...

5. [2022] NZACC 160–Taylor v ACC (22 August 2022) [pdf, 124 KB]

   ...hearing: $185.00 Total: $4,606.30 [4] In seeking costs band to 2B of the District Court Rules has been chosen. [5] Mr Cox on behalf of the appellant has emailed the registry on 11 August 2022 as follows: We do not have instructions to file any response to the memorandum filed on behalf of ACC. [6] In all of the circumstances as they are known to the Court, the costs sought by the respondent are fair. Accordingly, the appellant is ordered to pay costs and disburseme...

6. [2022] NZEmpC 125 Atlas Concrete Ltd v Cleland [pdf, 143 KB]

   ...papers Appearances: J D Turner, counsel for plaintiff D Gelb, advocate for defendant Judgment: 14 July 2022 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE J C HOLDEN (Application for stay of execution) [1] The plaintiff has filed challenges to a substantive determination and a costs determination of the Employment Relations Authority (the determinations).1 The parties have now filed a joint memorandum seeking orders by consent staying the determinations....

7. 2022 NZPSPLA 015.pdf [pdf, 73 KB]

   ...NZPSPLA 015 IN THE MATTER OF A complaint under s 74 of The Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act 2010 against ANTHONY WRIGHT & PRO SECURITY LIMITED HEARD by telephone on 27 April 2022 DECISION [1] The Police filed a complaint against Anthony Wright in October 2021 as he had been charged with threating to kill, assault and possession of an offensive weapon. The complaint was put on hold until there was an oncome on the charges. [2] Mr Wrig...

8. [2024] NZREADT 04 - ZA v REAA (6 March 2024) [pdf, 67 KB]

   ...against a licensee to a Complaints Assessment Committee on the basis that it disclosed only an inconsequential matter that need not be pursued. The Registrar’s determination was under s 74(3)(a) of the Act. [2] On 9 February 2024, the parties filed a Joint Memorandum inviting the Tribunal to reverse the Registrar’s decision by consent, so the Registrar might refer the matter to a Complaints Assessment Committee.1 OUTCOME [3] The review is upheld. The decision of the Regist...

9. 2024 NZPSPLA 079.pdf [pdf, 72 KB]

   ...[2024] NZPSPLA 079 IN THE MATTER OF A complaint by the Police under s 74 of the Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act 2010 (the Act) against KHONDAKER FAHIM AZIZ SADAT HEARD on the papers DECISION [1] Police filed a complaint against Khondaker Fahim Aziz Sadat in June 2024 as he was facing four charges of possession of an offensive weapon, possessing methamphetamine and his 3rd charge of driving while disqualified. If Mr Sadat is convicted on any of...

10. Consistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990: Patents Amendment Bill [pdf, 164 KB]

    ...in this advice. 3. The Bill amends the Patents Act 2013 (the principal Act) in relation to ‘divisional applications’ made under the Patents Act 1953. 4. The principal Act repealed and replaced the Patents Act 1953. Applications that were filed before the principal Act came into force, and any subsequent applications relating to them (known as ‘divisional applications’), are considered under the 1953 Act. 5. The criteria for examining patents under the Patents Act 1953 are l...