Search Results

1. [2006] NZEmpC WC 13/06 Griffith v Sunbeam Corp Ltd [pdf, 179 KB]

   GRIFFITH V SUNBEAM CORP LTD WN WC 13/06 28 July 2006 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON WC 13/06 WRC 26/04 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN MALCOLM BRUCE GRIFFITH Plaintiff AND SUNBEAM CORPORATION LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 21, 22 and 23 November 2005 Appearances: G J O'Sullivan, Counsel for Plaintiff R L Towner, Counsel for Defendant Judgment: 28 July 2006 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE A A COUCH

2. LCRO 182/2017 TP v ZN (14 September 2020) [pdf, 414 KB]

   ...scope of review [87] The nature and scope of a review have been discussed by the High Court, which said of the process of review under the Act:12 … the power of review conferred upon Review Officers is not appropriately equated with a general appeal. The obligations and powers of the Review Officer as described in the Act create a very particular statutory process. The Review Officer has broad powers to conduct his or her own investigations including the power to exercise for that...

3. [2023] NZEnvC 007 Ravenswood Developments Limited v Waimakariri Distrrict Council [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   RAVENSWOOD DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED v WAIMAKARIRI DISTRICT COUNCIL IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI ŌTAUTAHI Decision No. [2023] NZEnvC 7 IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991 AND an appeal under Clause 29 of Schedule 1 of the Act on Private Plan Change 30 to the Waimakariri District Plan BETWEEN RAVENSWOOD DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED (ENV-2022-CHC-001) Appellant AND WAIMAKARIRI DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Environment Judge J...

4. 20240806-FINAL-Proactive-Release-Sentencing-Reform-Tranche-One.pdf [pdf, 2.1 MB]

   ...potentially requiring thousands of additional prison beds within the next 5 – 10 years; 5.2. increase court delays as a result of more complex sentencing arrangements that could increase adjournments and the length of hearings; 5.3. increase appeals, legal challenges and compensation for breaches of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (NZBORA). 6. We have identified some preliminary options to address these issues and deliver on the Government’s objective of restoring law and...

5. Christie Alexis Lesley MARCEAU (CSU-2011-AUK-001471) [pdf, 12 MB]

   ...inquiry would consider whether the Judge exercised his judicial discretion to grant bail correctly. However, the inquest had no power to do so. This is because the grant of bail is a judicial decision that can be properly reviewed only by way of appeal (which did not occur in this case )3 or judicial review by a higher court (which the Coroner's Court is not). A coroner's inquest cannot be used to re-litigate the correctness or otherwise of a judicial decision. (b) Likewis...

6. [2016] NZEnvC 140 South Epsom Planning Group Inc & Three Kings United Group Inc v Auckland Council [pdf, 5.4 MB]

   ...carry out their functions in order to achieve the purpose of the Act. [19] Sections 74 and 75 RMA then go on to identify a series of specific requirements for preparation and change of district plans and their contents. The Environment Court in Appealing Wanaka Incorporated v Queenstown­ Lakes District Councif summarised the obligations of territorial authorities (and the Court) when considering the preparation or change of a district plan in these terms: Apart from their formal...

7. [2023] NZEmpC 105 Pilgrim & Ors v Attorney-General & Ors [pdf, 596 KB]

   ...the Overseeing Shepherd during much of the time that these proceedings are concerned with. [11] Hopeful Christian was sentenced to prison for sex offences against young women within the Gloriavale Community in 1995.12 He did not pursue an appeal against his convictions. He did pursue an appeal against the sentence that had been imposed. The Court of Appeal dismissed that appeal on grounds set out in a judgment of the Court.13 It was apparent that this sequence of events, and...

8. Conviction & sentencing of offenders in New Zealand 1996 to 2005 [pdf, 844 KB]

   ...and Modelling Unit Ministry of Justice 6 7 Contents Foreword 3 Acknowledgements 5 Contents 7 Tables 9 Figures 14 Executive Summary 15 1 Introduction 21 1.1 Background 21 1.2 Source of the data 21 1.3 Recording of appeals 22 1.4 Identification of cases 22 1.5 Quality of the data 24 1.6 Comparability with previous reports 25 1.7 Structure of the report 25 2 Prosecutions and convictions for all offences 29 2.1 Introduction 29 2.2 Outcome of prosecutions...

9. Ministry of Justice Annual Report 2023/24 [pdf, 5.6 MB]

   ...Consequently, their work aligns well with our purpose of strengthening people's trust in New Zealand. In 2023/24: • the Electoral Commission delivered the 2023 General Election • the Criminal Cases Review Commission referred two further cases to appeal courts after making its first referral in 2022/23 • the Human Rights Commission commenced its term as Chair of the Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institution’s Sub- Committee on Accreditation, reviewing the performa...

10. AE v Secretary of Justice 21 November 2017 NZRA 004/2017 (Amended) [pdf, 118 KB]

    ...applicant has drawn my attention to an error which he says he created in his covering letter of 26 June 2017 in which he stated that he was seeking approval for “Criminal category 4” along with PDLA, Duty Solicitor, Civil (Employment) and Court of Appeal and Supreme Court. 3. The Applicant advises that he was seeking approval in Criminal PAL 1-4 as his substantive application recorded. He seeks that my decision now be amended to include approvals for Criminal PAL 1-3. 4. He...