Search Results

1. Saunders v Accident Compensation Corporation (Ordinary Resident in NZ) [2023] NZACC 153 [pdf, 213 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 153 ACR 182/22 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN KEVIN SAUNDERS Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 22 August 2023 Heard at: Wellington Appearances: Kevin Saunders, Appellant (via AVL) Ms S Shaw and Ms V Squires for the Respondent Judgment: 19 September 202...

2. NE v Accident Compensation Corporation (Claims process) [2025] NZACC 019 (31 January 2025) [pdf, 161 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2025] NZACC 019 ACAR 175/22 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 149 OF THE ACT BETWEEN NE Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: 27 January 2025 Held at: Wellington/Te Whanganui-a Tara by AVL Appearances: The Appellant is self-represented L Hawes-Gandar for the Accident Compe...

3. Ask NZ court to suspend enforcement while appeal to Australian court

   If someone registers an Australian judgment against you in New Zealand, you can apply to the New Zealand court to stay (suspend) enforcement while you are appealing against the Australian judgment or asking the Australian court to change or cancel the decision. You can do this by making an interlocutory application to the New Zealand court

   Located in:

   1. Courts >
   2. Civil >
   3. Disputes with someone in Australia

4. [2009] NZEmpC AC 8/09 von Tunzelman V Taylor Worldwide Publishers Ltd (In liquidation) [pdf, 20 KB]

   ...Discussion [7] The principles governing a recall of a judgment are set out in Horowhenua County v Nash (No. 2)1 at page 633. Wild C J said: Generally speaking, a judgment once delivered must stand for better or worse subject, of course, to appeal. Were it otherwise there would be great inconvenience and uncertainty. There are, I think, three categories of cases in which a judgment not perfected may be recalled – first, where since the hearing there has been an amendment to a re...

5. Tucker v CAC 20006 & Claydon - Penalty Decision [2012] NZREADT 64 [pdf, 23 KB]

   Decision No: [2012] NZREADT 64 Reference No: READT 016/12 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s.111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN GRANT TUCKER Appellant AND REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 20006) First Respondent AND GLENICE CLAYDON Second Respondent BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Ms K Davenport - Chairperson Mr G Denley - Member Ms J Robson - Member PENALTY DECISION Introduction [1] In its deci...

6. [2015] NZSSAA 027, 20 April [pdf, 22 KB]

   [2015] NZSSAA 027 Reference No. SSA 152/14 IN THE MATTER of the Social Security Act 1964 AND IN THE MATTER of an appeal by XXXX of XXXX against a decision of a Benefits Review Committee BEFORE THE SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL AUTHORITY Ms M Wallace - Chairperson Mr K Williams - Member Lady Tureiti Moxon - Member HEARING at Auckland on 9 March 2015 APPEARANCES The appellant in person Mr A Singh for the Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social...

7. Advantage Realty Limited v CAC303 & Anor [2016] NZREADT 6 [pdf, 63 KB]

   BEFORE THE REAL ESTATE AGENTS DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL [2016] NZREADT 6 READT 089/14 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN ADVANTAGE REALTY LIMITED Appellant AND REAL ESTATE AGENTS AUTHORITY (CAC 303) First respondent AND VINCENT and KATHLEEN GAMBINO Second respondents READT 091/14 IN THE MATTER OF an appeal under s 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 BETWEEN VINCENT and KATHLEEN GAMB...

8. [2018] NZEnvC 063 Air New Zealand, Queenstown Airport Corp Ltd, Remarkables Park Ltd & Shotover Park Ltd v Queenstown Lakes District Council [pdf, 1.1 MB]

   BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT I MUA I TE KOOTI TAIAO 0 AOTEAROA IN THE MATTER AND BETWEEN AND Decision No. [2018] NZEnvC 63 of the Resource Management Act 1991 of appeals pursuant to clause 14 of the First Schedule AIR NEW ZEALAND LIMITED (ENV-2011-WLG-01 ) QUEENSTOWN AIRPORT CORPORATION LIMITED (ENV-2011-WLG-03) REMARKABLES PARK LIMITED AND SHOTOVER PARK LTD (ENV-2011-WLG-04) Appellants QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Environment Judge...

9. Maruera v Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Maru (Taranaki) Trust [2019] Māori Appellate Court MB 52 (2019 APPEAL 52) [pdf, 264 KB]

   2019 Māori Appellate Court MB 52 IN THE MĀORI APPELLATE COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A20180005607 APPEAL 2018/11 UNDER Section 79, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF TE RŪNANGA O NGĀTI MARU (TARANAKI) TRUST BETWEEN HAEMONA MARUERA Appellant AND TE RŪNANGA O NGĀTI MARU (TARANAKI) TRUST Respondent Hearing: On the papers Court: Judge Wainwright (Presiding) Judge Coxhead Judge Dooga...

10. 15 April 2019 Otahuao Burial Ground Trust v Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga [pdf, 211 KB]

    ...CX10086 PO Box 7147 Auckland Telephone: (09) 916 9091 Facsimile: (09) 916 9090 http://www.justice.govt.nz/courts/environment-court EC4240_NoticeOfSessionListOfParties SCHEDULE OF PROCEEDINGS An appeal against a decision to grant an authority for archaeological site P05/877 to undertake earthworks to upgrade boat launching facilities at Windsor Reserve, Kerikeri Inlet, Kerikeri An appeal against a decision granting an author...