Search Results

1. [2010] NZEmpC 109 Rolling Thunder Motor Co Ltd v Kennedy [pdf, 34 KB]

   ...services from other businesses in the BarterCard scheme. It operates in a similar way to company credit cards. 8 The Plaintiff agreed to open the account with BarterCard. 9 To make the BarterCard scheme more relevant to the Plaintiff the Defendant requested that some employees of the Plaintiff (including herself) have their own personal accounts on the Plaintiff’s BarterCard account. This would allow them to make personal purchases for themselves and the employees would then reimb...

2. LCRO 239/2016 RY v P AN and T AN (25 September 2018) [pdf, 314 KB]

   ...undertaking” provided by the builder’s lawyer, and secondly, “to seek clarification …[which] resulted in [Mr and Mrs AN] being given inaccurate assurances” by Mr RY concerning the deposit paid by them. [17] The Committee declined Mr and Mrs AN’s request for compensation because “there was always going to be an added cost component” to the purchase due to the insolvency of the builder. However, “in recognition of the additional expense and unnecessary stress incurr...

3. NZ Private Prosecution Service Ltd v Key (Application for Disclosure Order No. 2) [2015] NZHRRT 24 [pdf, 39 KB]

   ...Prosecution Service Ltd v Key (Application for Disclosure Order No. 2) [2015] NZHRRT 24] 2 [2] On the morning of 12 June 2015 by email timed at 10:49am Mr McCready filed a memorandum (copied to about 10 news media organisations or journalists) requesting: [2.1] The address for service for Ms Bailey. [2.2] The contact details of counsel for Ms Bailey. [2.3] Confirmation of “the date that Amanda Bailey was served with all the documents filed by the Plaintiff”. [2.4] Confirm...

4. LCRO 117/2017 LA v KB (11 December 2019) [pdf, 157 KB]

   ...lodged a complaint with the Lawyers Complaints Service on 17 November 2016. He said he did so in his capacity as a trustee of the NB Trust, whose interests he said were “creditors” in the liquidator’s claim against the Council. [14] He requested an investigation into Mr BAK’s “fee and its structure” which he said was unfair to him, and to the public at large. He sought a refund of the fees charged by Mr BAK, and disciplinary sanction by way of a fine against Mr BAK....

5. Apostolakis v Rennie (Strike-Out Application) 2017 NZHRRT 42 [pdf, 286 KB]

   ...(Strike-Out Application) [2017] NZHRRT 42.] 2 defendant is the daughter of Mr Damir De Polo who in 2006 was represented by Ms Rennie in proceedings in the Family Court. In those proceedings Mr De Polo sought a Protection Order against his former de facto partner, Mrs K Apostolakis, the plaintiff in the present proceedings. Ms Rennie was also acting for Mr De Polo in relationship property matters arising out of his relationship with Mrs Apostolakis. According to the statement of...

6. [2015] NZEmpC 165 NZ Meat Workers & Related Trades Union Inc v AFFCO NZ Ltd [pdf, 86 KB]

   ...commencing on 27 October 2015. I just emphasise that I have very much paraphrased the nature of the two sets of proceedings. [2] Somewhat belatedly in EMPC 152/2015 the plaintiffs have sought further amendments to their second amended statement of claim. This in part is opposed by the defendant AFFCO. One of the amendments sought and which is not opposed, is of an inconsequential nature. It is something which can be attended to at the hearing without the need to formally file...

7. CAC 401 v Black & Wong [2016] NZREADT 42 [pdf, 149 KB]

   ...dispute between the two companies. [5] The issues in this case arise out of what happened next. Almost a year after the sale of the property and in July 2013, Mr Smith was in Century 21’s office in Pakuranga when Mr Black approached him and made a request that he pay Mr Black and Mr Wong the sum of $2,000 each. Mr Black said that this was their share of the commission on the property. Mr Smith declined to make this payment. [6] Mr Smith’s evidence is that in August 2013 Mr Blac...

8. Ngāti Taimanawaiti Māori Incorporation - Lot 2 DP 29547 (9 Old North Road, Orewa) (2016) 135 Taitokerau MB 20 (135 TTK 20) [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...under review [8] On 4 May 2016, a Deputy Registrar wrote a letter to the applicants rejecting the injunction application. That letter states: 135 Taitokerau MB 22 Thank you for filing the above injunction application in our Auckland Information Office on 6 April 2016. Upon review of your application the following matters have been considered by the Court: (a) Does the Court have jurisdiction? (i) The land of which the injunction relates to is claimed as Lot 2 DP 2...

9. LCRO 47/2014 HJ v GK [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...returned, to the writer’s offices, by 5pm Wednesday, 28 August 2013 (note, no extension of time shall be granted), failing which appropriate action will be taken through the relevant authorities without further notice to you. [7] Mr HJ responded claiming ownership of the forms, and rejecting the Directors’ claims. [8] Mr GK replied on 30 August 2013, describing Mr HJ’s claim to ownership as “ludicrous” and, on behalf of the Directors, rejected his explanation. Mr GK’s let...

10. [2011] NZEmpC 99 Broughton v Microsoft NZ Ltd [pdf, 77 KB]

    ...defendant Judgment: 8 August 2011, recalled and re-issued 10 August 2011 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE GL COLGAN [1] This interlocutory judgment determines the defendant’s objection to disclosure and inspection of certain documents as requested by the plaintiff, and associated issues. [2] The procedure that has led to this hearing, and the need to depart significantly from the statutory scheme for disclosure and inspection of documents under the Employment Cour...