[2021] NZACC 95 – Kirkland v ACC (5 July 2021) [pdf, 200 KB]
...submitted that her Honour failed to give adequate reasons for her decision and conclusions and instead simply stated that overall the conclusions of Mr Pai were well reasoned and compelling. It is submitted that there is no analysis of why her Honour formed this view and that one would have expected, in particular, analysis of the implications of the earlier radiological findings and other evidence relied on in the first appeal decision given the high threshold for revocation in s 65....