Search Results

1. [2022] NZEmpC 52 Fechney v Employment Relations Authority [pdf, 382 KB]

   ...in person and K Murray, advocate for applicant No appearance for first respondent H Kynaston and H Khan, counsel for second respondent S McKechnie and T Bremner, counsel for intervener Judgment: 23 March 2022 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE J C HOLDEN [1] Ms Fechney is an employment advocate who recently has been acting in a number of cases in which employees, or former employees, have challenged the application of the Government’s COVID-19 mandates. One of the p...

2. MLC-Notification-of-Applications-Over-6-months-old.pdf [pdf, 1.8 MB]

   1 Notification of applications that have not been finally determined (over 6 months old) 31 May 2022 TAKE NOTICE THAT the following schedule of applications are hereby notified pursuant to rule 5.11(2)(b) of the Māori Land Court Rules 2011 being applications which are 6 months or older as at 31 May 2022, and which are currently held by the Registrar in the District set out, or, in the case of applications to the Chief Judge of Māori Land Court or those to the Māori Appell...

3. MacNaughtan v Accident Compensation Corporation (Treatment Injury/Causation) [2023] NZACC 160 [pdf, 327 KB]

   ...Wellington Appearances: Mr R Mansfield KC for the Appellant Mr L Hawes-Gandar and Ms F Becroft for the Respondent Judgment: 3 October 2023 ___________________________________________________________________________ RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE C J MCGUIRE (Personal Injury – Section 26; Treatment Injury – Sections 32 and 33; Causation) ___________________________________________________________________________ [1] At issue in this appeal is a decision of the respondent de...

4. [2023] NZEmpC 155 E Tū Inc v Singh [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...INCORPORATED Plaintiff AND SHER SINGH Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: S Mitchell KC, counsel for plaintiff D Fleming, counsel for defendant Judgment: 18 September 2023 CONSENT JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE CHRISTINA INGLIS (Application for stay of execution) [1] The plaintiff has challenged a determination of the Employment Relations Authority dated 19 July 2023.1 In its determination the Authority ordered the plaintiff to pay the...

5. [2023] NZEmpC 172 E Tū Inc v Singh [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...SHER SINGH Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: S Mitchell KC, counsel for plaintiff D Fleming, counsel for defendant Judgment: 18 September 2023 Reissued: 4 October 2023 CONSENT JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE CHRISTINA INGLIS (Application for stay of execution) [1] The plaintiff has challenged a determination of the Employment Relations Authority dated 19 July 2023.1 In its determination the Authority ordered the plaintiff to pay the...

6. Pay reparation

   ...know and give us evidence so we can update our records. If you don’t then we will keep asking you for payment. If you have outstanding fines in addition to reparation, any money you pay will go towards the reparation first. How the process works If a judge has ordered you to pay reparation, you will be sent a Notice of Fine telling you: how much reparation you owe any other fines or court costs you have been ordered to pay how to pay. The judge may also include instructions during sentencin...

   Located in:

   1. Fines & payments >
   2. About reparation

7. [2025] NZEmpC 177 (Judgment (No 8) of Judge M S King 15 August 2025 [pdf, 133 KB]

   ...BETWEEN STU Applicant AND FRD Respondent Hearing: On the papers Appearances: K J Crossland, counsel for applicant E Anderson, counsel for respondent Judgment: 15 August 2025 JUDGMENT (NO 8) OF JUDGE M S KING (Application for variation of freezing and ancillary orders) [1] On 6 November 2023 I granted an application for a freezing order against FRD, a former employee of STU.1 The orders had been reviewed and extended...

8. The Māori Trustee v Smith - Waipaoa 5A2 (2017) 72 Tairāwhiti MB 57 (72 TRW 57) [pdf, 546 KB]

   ...Smith, Daniel Smith and Ulrick Smith Ms Helen Nathan, Counsel for Clinton Hemana Mr Greg Shaw, Counsel for the Māori Trustee Ms Karen Feint, Independent Counsel assisting the Court Judgment: 17 November 2017 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF JUDGE M J DOOGAN Copies to: Leo Watson, Barrister and Solicitor, 342 Gloucester St, Napier 4112, leo@leowatson.co.nz Helen Nathan, East Brewster Limited, Solicitors for the Respondents, DX JP 30017, Rotorua...

9. Chambers v Tawhiti Blocks Trust - Mangahauini No. 1 Road Line (2013) 31 Tairawhiti MB 165 (31 TRW 165) [pdf, 172 KB]

   ...Tairāwhiti MB 289 2 April 2012, 21 Tairāwhiti MB 159-165 (Heard at Ruatōria) 29 January 2013, 28 Tairāwhiti MB 19-20 4 April 2013, 29 Tairāwhiti MB 180-185 (Heard at Gisborne) Judgment: 16 July 2013 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF DEPUTY CHIEF JUDGE C L FOX 31 Tairawhiti MB 166 Introduction [1] Ms Chambers is an owner in Mangahauini 1A Section 55 and 56, a block of Māori freehold land situated at Tokomaru Bay on the East Coast. She was p...

10. Hape v Smith - Part Te Pupuke K No 2 (Māori Reservation) (2015) 99 Taitokerau MB 174 (99 TTK 174) [pdf, 189 KB]

    ...MATTER OF Part Te Pupuke K No 2 (Māori Reservation) BETWEEN HAZEL HAPE Applicant AND BRYCE SMITH Respondent Hearing: 5 February 2015 (Heard at Kaikohe) Judgment: 5 February 2015 ORAL JUDGMENT OF JUDGE M P ARMSTRONG 99 Taitokerau MB 175 Introduction [1] This is an application for the removal of Bryce Smith as a trustee of Part Te Pupuke K No 2 (Māori Reservation). [2] The issue...