Search Results

1. TG v Tangilanu [2012] NZIACDT 11 (27 March 2012) [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...held when Ms Tangilanu became a licensed immigration adviser on 24 September 2010, as they had been expended by that time. Accordingly, it appeared the Tribunal had no jurisdiction over those fees. [14] Ms Tangilanu was the holder of a provisional licence. She had referred to her supervisor having a role in these instructions. It was not clear from the papers what that role was. Accordingly, the minute notified Ms Tangilanu that if she considered her supervisor had any responsibility...

2. [2023] NZIACDT 2 - DD v Pabellon (5 January 2023) [pdf, 204 KB]

   ...standards in handling client matters. This included undertaking additional training, specifically on the skilled migrant category, and putting in place improved quality assurance measures and processes in her business. [19] Ms Pabellon has been a licenced immigration adviser since 2013 and has developed a successful business with an excellent reputation. This is the first complaint made against her. It is submitted that Ms Pabellon has already taken active steps to address th...

3. OS & KB Ltd v KS & NS [2023] NZDT 187 (18 April 2023) [pdf, 153 KB]

   ...car at the time of the collision. 10. At the hearing KS said that he had been driving his father’s car with two passengers prior to the collision. KS and his passengers were all aged 16 or 17 at the time of the collision. KS had a restricted licence. It is not clear if NS had a licence, although at the hearing OS said that NS had told her in a Facebook message that NS did not have a licence at all (not even a learner licence). 11. KS said that prior to the collision he had been dri...

4. Millane 14 July 2014 NZSHD 10 [pdf, 22 KB]

   ...applicant Raymond Patrick Millane is the same Raymond Patrick Millane who was convicted of the four charges in Christchurch on 22 June 2011 which include the conviction under s.239 of the Crimes Act 1961. The full name, the date of birth and the driver licence number of the convicted person are identical with details supplied by the applicant in his application. [11] Such a conviction under s.239 of the Crimes Act 1961 is a ‘specified offence” as defined in 4 of the Act. [12] By vi...

5. FI v UY LCRO 254 / 2010 (28 September 2011) [pdf, 89 KB]

   ...her husband that from then on, they required all communications with regard to the Estate to be directed through UY’s office. [6] FJ & FL owned a unit in a retirement village in Wellington. FL was not living in the unit and the Occupation Licence was to be surrendered. In December 2008 it had been agreed that FI’s husband would negotiate the surrender of the Licence with ACT. FI assumed that the unit formed part of the Estate and it does not appear that there was any discu...

6. Complaints Assessment Committee 409 v Ganesh [2018] NZREADT 27 [pdf, 195 KB]

   ...may impose under s 93 of the Act (these include censuring or reprimanding the licensee, and ordering the licensee to undergo training or education); [b] Impose a fine of up to $15,000; [c] Order cancellation or suspension of the licensee’s licence; Submissions [21] Mr Waalkens submitted for the Committee that cancellation is the appropriate penalty, in light of the gravity of Mr Ganesh’s conduct, in particular that he lied to the Authority’s investigator in the course of...

7. [2024] NZIACDT 08 - MT v Murthy (21 February 2024) [pdf, 127 KB]

   ...about her work and seeking a further refund. Ms Murthy replied declining a refund. Decision of the Tribunal [9] It was found by the Tribunal that Ms Murthy had: 1 MT v Murthy [2024] NZIACDT 3. 3 (1) Failed to ensure the name and licence number of her son, also a licensed immigration adviser who worked on the file, were written in the service contract, in breach of cl 19(a). (2) Failed to include payment terms in the service contract, in breach of cl 19(i). (3) Fail...

8. CAC306 v Zhou & Anor [2016] NZREADT 12 [pdf, 212 KB]

   ...conduct. Mr She defended the three charges against him and we found him guilty on one charge of misconduct (charge 4 set out below) and on one charge of unsatisfactory conduct. [2] From at least 19 December 2014 both those defendants have had their licences as real estate salespersons suspended. Some aspects of the substantive case were rather involved and we have covered them in much detail in our said substantive decision but, for present purposes, we set out some of our findings u...

9. Benjamin - Te Puna 154D3B2B (2003) 73 Tauranga MB 235 (76 T 235) [pdf, 555 KB]

   ...property. For these reasons the Applicant has applied for the injunction. The application under s 18(1)(a)/93 asks the Court to determine rights of occupation as between the Applicant and Mr Smith. In August 1989 the trustees of the land granted a licence to occupy to Mr Smith. On A03-7212. A03-7215 Minute Book: 76 T 236 10th August 2001 the Court granted an occupation order to the Applicant, which gave her an area of occupation of 988 square metres as defined on the plan an...

10. CAC 10063 v Raj - Penalty Decision [2012] NZREADT 62 [pdf, 20 KB]

    ...Raj is no longer practicing as a real estate agent and therefore many of the penalties available to the Tribunal are not available. However we note that had Mr Raj still been an agent we would have considered seriously suspending or removing his licence as the appropriate penalty for this charge. However we cannot impose such a penalty. The Tribunal may censure Mr Raj and may fine him up to $15,000. 2 [3] Mr Barron-Afeaki on behalf of Mr Raj made comprehensive submissions bu...