Search Results

1. Independent review of intelligence and security - call for submissions [pdf, 951 KB]

   ...threats to life or security. Further reading For more information, see:  NZSIS Act (available at http://www.legislation.govt.nz/).  GCSB Act (available at http://www.legislation.govt.nz/).  Select Committee Report and Regulatory Impact Statement on the GCSB and Related Legislation Amendment Bill 2013 (available at http://www.legislation.govt.nz/and http://www.gcsb.govt.nz/about-us/legislation/). http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1969/0024/latest/DLM391606.html?sea...

2. Ruddelle v Auckland District Health Board [2021] NZHRRT 5 [pdf, 230 KB]

   ...Michael’s ACC form without express consent were not investigated by the Privacy Commissioner, so are not within the jurisdiction of this Tribunal to determine. [9] Ms Ruddelle is seeking a declaration of an interference with her privacy, an official statement from the ADHB, and damages of at least $20,000. [10] The ADHB disputes there has been any interference with privacy. It submits that Dr Bidwell complied with the Health Information Privacy Code 1994 (HIPC) in disclosing and us...

3. LCRO 117/2017 LA v KB (11 December 2019) [pdf, 157 KB]

   ...4 [AB] Investments Ltd, on 2 February 2011, and [CD] Investments Ltd, on 1 April 2011. 5 Liquidator's sixth report to creditors (31 January 2014) - Mr LA's companies. 6 Liquidator's second report to creditors (22 November 2011). The statement, dated 30 August 2006, prepared by the lawyer who acted for the property companies on the purchase of the property shows that the purchase was funded partly by a loan from a finance company. The bank appears to have refinanced that lo...

4. National Standards Committee 2 v Mr Q [2023] NZLCDT 14 (2 May 2023) [pdf, 213 KB]

   ...current firm to adjust for the suspension order, it will take effect on 16 May 2023. Should we order compensation? [47] Victim A does not seek compensation for emotional harm. We should respect her stance. [48] Victim B has filed a victim impact statement, the contents of which we permanently suppress. We accept her statement. The effect of the conduct on her directly and the consequent issues require compensation for emotional harm under s 156(1)(d). Mr Q accepts that an or...

5. [2023] NZIACDT 26 - BL v Registrar (10 October 2023) [pdf, 241 KB]

   ...properly considered and rejected by a specialist decision-maker. [43] In respect of the complaint concerning a written authority, the Registrar noted that prior to the initial consultation, the appellant had been sent an information sheet with a statement about verification. It was reasonable for the adviser to make further enquiries. [44] Counsel contends that the services provided by the adviser occurred in two distinct periods, the first on 1 and 2 February, and the second on...

6. Waitangi Tribunal Vol 1 Kāhui Maunga Report [pdf, 7.2 MB]

   t e K ā h u i M a u n g a Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz t e K ā h u i M a u n g a The National Park District Inquiry Report Volume 1 Waitangi Tribunal Report 2013 Wai 1130 Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz Downloaded from www.waitangitribunal.govt.nz National Library of New Zealand Catalo

7. Pilbrow & Anor as Trustees of the Pilbrow Family Trust v Moorhead [2011] NZWHT Auckland 31 [pdf, 352 KB]

   Page | 1 IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2009-100-000059 [2011] NZWHT AUCKLAND 31 BETWEEN OWEN IVOR MAUL PILBROW and JOAN GWENDOLINE PILBROW as Trustees of the PILBROW FAMILY TRUST Claimant AND HUGH CHARLES MOORHEAD and BARBARA MARY MOORHEAD First Respondents AND CRAVEN BUILDERS LIMITED Second Respondent AND EUROPLAST FINISHES LIMITED Third Respondent AND LANCE CLARK Fourth Respondent AND DAVID TAYLOR Fifth Respondent AND GIANNI MA

8. Research report: Without notice applications in the Family Court [pdf, 1.7 MB]

   Nan Wehipeihana, Kellie Spee and Shaun Akroyd Research Evaluation Consultancy Limited – a member of the Kinnect Group Without Notice Applications in the Family Court A research report prepared for the Ministry of Justice Acknowledgements Thank you to the parents and grandparents who participated in this research. Your contribution to the research was invaluable and deeply aided our understanding of the motivations and

9. Waitangi Tribunal - The Whanganui district [pdf, 1.6 MB]

   RANGAHAUA WHANUI DISTRICT 9 THE WHANGANUI DISTRICT SUZANNE CROSS AND BRIAN BARGH APRIL 1996 WORKING PAPER: FIRST RELEASE WAITANGI TRIBUNAL RANGAHAUA WHANUI SERIES Other reports in the Rangahaua Whanui Series available: District 7: The Volcanic Plateau, B J Bargh District 11A: Wairarapa, P Goldsmith District 13: The Northern South Island, Dr G A Phillipson FOREWORD The research report that follows is one of a series of historical surveys commi

10. Crosswell v Auckland City Council [pdf, 92 KB]

    ...Council (Council) opposed the claim for the cost of the eaves and evidence was given by three experts all of whom were cross-examined. All three experts confirmed that the addition of the eaves was not necessary in order to obtain a building consent to complete the remedial work. [31] In Lester v White [1992] 2 NZLR 383 at para 499, Greig J had stated: “A plaintiff can be entitled to no more than the costs of the cheapest remedy for the damage caused.” However, th...