12971 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 794 APPLICANT OD RESPONDENT JE The Tribunal orders: Claim: The claim is dismissed. Counterclaim: The counterclaim is dismissed. Reasons The claim [1] OD purchased a car from JE. She discovered after the purchase that the car was defective, and she seeks a refund and other costs from him. JE counterclaims for costs he has incurred in...
...counsel for plaintiff Stephen Thomas, counsel for defendant Judgment: 10 March 2010 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT (No 2) OF JUDGE B S TRAVIS [1] The plaintiff company has applied for an order extending the time for filing its statement of claim. This application is opposed by the defendant. [2] The grounds for the application were that in my interlocutory judgment of 7 December 2009 (CC 20/09), dealing with a “good faith report”, I noted that the defendant in her submi...
The fixed fee learning tool simplifies and provides clarity on the Criminal Fixed Fee Schedule. The tool takes you through the fixed fee schedule, letting you click for more information and guidance on when a fee can be claimed. The user can select fees and then see the total cost for these on the final screen. The tool can be used as a learning resource or in conjunction with the word package templates to generate an invoice. Please note all fixed fee amounts are as of August 2023....
From 6 June 2015, all repossession agents must be licensed and all repossession employees must have a certificate of approval (COA). Repossession agents or employees who don’t have a licence or certificate and repossess consumer goods (or claim they have the right to do so) could be fined up to $40,000.
...submitted to the Tribunal until the day before the hearing. I would agree with the applicants that this kind of DNA test is not likely to be helpful in considering whether the puppy sold to TB and UB had the congenital condition referred to in the claim. 10) Further to the above, a puppy that experiences what this one did, about 10 days after a purchase, which is assessed as being likely to have the congenital condition in question, is not, I conclude, of acceptable quality for the purp...
...balance of probabilities; that is, which party’s account I find the more probable. Decision [11] I find that the Respondent is liable for repairs to the hydraulics and gear box water/oil issues, but not the other amounts claimed. My reasons are set out below. Liability in general [12] The Respondent claims that it should not be liable at all for any of the items claimed because the sale was on behalf and no warranties given. [13] My finding on this...
...for L E Builders Limited Judgment: 18 October 2011 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B S TRAVIS [1] After hearing a full and excellent argument from both counsel, in support of and in opposition to the plaintiff’s application to join the former sole director of the defendant company Lawrence Leong Eng Loo as a party, I determined that the most appropriate course was to adjourn the application until the substantive challenge has been disposed of. The following are my reason...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2016] NZDT 1444 APPLICANT YT RESPONDENT ED Limited The Tribunal hereby orders: ED Limited is to pay the sum of $9,342.50 to YT on or before 1 September 2016. Reasons: 1. Mr T wished to build a minor dwelling at the back of his house. In April 2015, he contacted ED Limited (ED) and they started negotiations. On 2 July 2015, t...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 8 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1539 APPLICANT X Limited (formerly Q Limited) RESPONDENT II SECOND RESPONDENT BI The Tribunal orders: II and BI are liable to pay $7,536.78 to X Limited in respect of the claim. X Limited is liable to pay $4,492.88 to II and BI in respect of the counter claim. After the amount of $4,492.88 payable by X Limited...
...A20210005769 A20210004830 WĀHANGA Under Sections 238 and 241, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 MŌ TE TAKE In the matter of Kawerau A Section 13 and Others I WAENGA I A Between NGAWHAINGA KIRIONA Te kaitono Applicant ME And TE ARA GROOT, KIPA HOHEPA, MIHITERINA HOHEPA, PEREPE PHILLIP HOHEPA, KAPUA HOHEPA-WATENE, BLANCHE KIRIONA AND RAYMOND PATIHANA TOLLEY AS TRUSTEES OF THE TUKUAHAU WHĀNAU TRUST Ngā kaiurupare Responden...