12958 items matching your search terms
AN EMPLOYEE V AN EMPLOYER CHCH CC 8/07 15 May 2007 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH CC 8/07 CRC 3/06 IN THE MATTER OF an application to extend time in which to file a challenge BETWEEN AN EMPLOYEE Applicant AND AN EMPLOYER Respondent Hearing: On papers filed on 19 February and 1 March 2007 Appearances: D G Beck, Counsel for Applicant C R French, Counsel for Respondent Judgment: 15 May 2007 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE A A COUCH [1] T...
...immigration adviser. [2] They had applied personally for visas and received a letter from Immigration New Zealand raising issues of concern. [3] They sought Mr Hakaoro’s assistance and say they paid him fees of $50, $200, and $500. [4] They claim Mr Hakaoro did not take the steps required to initiate a professional relationship, failed to give the appropriate advice, misrepresented what work he was doing, and made unprofessional threats. [5] Mr Hakaoro says he was not working for...
...The district inquiries, focusing mainly on histor ical claims, have also taken longer to complete than anticipated in 2014. They now include a new inquiry in the Northeastern Bay of Plenty dis trict, granted in June this year in response to applications for a hearing of Whakatōhea’s historical claims. The district, remedies, and many urgent inquiries are concerned mainly with historical claims or the pro cess for settling those claims with the Crown. They therefore remain t...
...its failure to pay monies owed to Mr Michael Dunlop. Subsequently, Mr Parbhu, the plaintiff’s managing director and representative in the proceedings, sought leave to challenge the whole of the determination by way of a hearing de novo. The application was not opposed and leave was granted accordingly. The scope of the challenge was confirmed in a minute issued to the parties on 20 March 2012. [2] By way of background, Mr Dunlop was employed by the plaintiff as a salesperso...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 757 APPLICANT ML RESPONDENT KD The Tribunal orders: 1. KD is to pay ML $6,149.50 on or before Wednesday 17 January 2024. 2. Within the period which ends 30 working days after the due date for payment of that sum, or such other date as the parties may agree, KD is entitled to make arrangements, at a time and date which is agreed...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 163 APPLICANT ND Limited RESPONDENT DD t/as HD The Tribunal orders: DD is to pay ND Ltd $3,488.66 by 8 May 2024. Background 1. The dispute is about a coffee machine. 2. In March 2013, NS Ltd supplied a coffee machine to NI under the terms of a written supply agreement. NI owned HD in [town]. 3. In July 2022, CQ purc...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 545 APPLICANT YI RESPONDENT CU Ltd The Tribunal orders: CU Ltd are to pay $2472.38 to YI on or before 16 November 2023. Reasons 1. YI engaged CU Ltd (‘CU’) as the property manager for her rental property. Between July 2022 and March 2023, multiple and significant water leaks occurred at the property – as a result YI...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 487 APPLICANT TI and NI RESPONDENT HJ Ltd The Tribunal orders: HJ Ltd is to pay $24,856.39 to TI and NI before 4 July 2024. Reasons 1. HJ Ltd painted the roof of NI and TI’s home in February-March 2022. NI and TI say that within weeks the paint started bubbling. NI and TI claim $24,856.39 from HJ Ltd made up as follows:
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 484 APPLICANT UH RESPONDENT C Ltd The Tribunal orders: C Ltd is to pay UH $19,468.80 within 28 days. C Ltd is substituted as the respondent for BI Reasons [1] UH claims from C Ltd, represented by director BI, the sum of $30,000.00 for recruitment of staff for C Ltd, as well as interest and costs. C Ltd denies liability to pay. [2] UH said...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 445 APPLICANTS UC and SM RESPONDENT BC The Tribunal orders: 1. UC and SM are to provide BC with their bank account details immediately. 2. When these details have been provided BC is to pay $216.00 to UC and SM before 9 June 2024. 3. If UC and SM do not provide BC with their bank account details before 2 June 2024, BC is not requ...