2771 items matching your search terms
1 IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2021] NZHRRT 22 I TE TARAIPIUNARA MANA TANGATA Reference No. HRRT 024/2016 UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT 2020 BETWEEN YAN GUO PLAINTIFF AND PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS DEFENDANT AT WELLINGTON BEFORE: Mr RPG Haines ONZM QC, Chairperson REPRESENTATION: Ms Y Guo in person assisted by Ms Li Yan (her mother) as McKenzie friend Mr TL Clarke for defendant Ms HC Stuart for CityMed Medical Centre L...
...applications in a timely manner. This supports access to justice for people who have been wrongfully convicted, particularly for Māori who comprise 38 percent of applications to Te Kāhui Tātari Ture. $4.816 million over four years Office of the Privacy Commissioner (Vote Justice) Funding for additional staffing in the Office of the Privacy Commissioner to strengthen its compliance and enforcement function so it can continue its support for agencies in meeting their Privacy Act 20...
...sharing or publishing confidential and sensitive coronial and health information at the centre of a recent cyber security incident.The National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC), Police and CERT NZ are investigating the incident. We are also working with the Privacy Commissioner.The order was granted in an urgent High Court hearing this afternoon. There is existing precedent for obtaining orders against unknown people.In a joint statement, Te Whatu Ora and the Ministry of Justice said while there wa...
...proceedings without the disclosure of any more information about the private lives of individuals, or matters that are commercially sensitive, than is necessary to satisfy the principle of open justice: (d) the protection of other confidentiality and privacy interests (including those of children and other vulnerable members of the community) and any privilege held by, or available to, any person: (e) the principle of open justice (including the encouragement of fair and accurate reporting of,...
...may be given the lawyer’s opening and closing addresses or the judge’s summing up. You must keep all details relating to a case confidential. There may also be suppression orders in place. Read more about name suppression The Ministry of Justice Privacy Guidelines for providers of Justice Services are a useful resource that can help you keep information confidential and secure, and meet our requirements in the Standard Terms. You can read the guidelines on our website: Privacy Guidelines fo...
...person’s possessory interest in property falls relatively easily within that plain language. However, we note that the Court of Appeal has referred to the "touchstone" in s 21 BORA being "the protection of reasonable expectations of privacy."[8] 19. However, the New Zealand jurisprudence has been somewhat inconsistent in the application of this concept to particular fact situations. In the early case of Alwen Industries v Comptroller of Customs[9] Blanchard J had to...
...the Bill constitutes a search for the purposes of s 21 of the Bill of Rights Act.2 14. The next question is whether this search power is reasonable. In assessing this, we have considered the place of the search, the degree of intrusiveness into privacy, and reasons why it is necessary.3 15. We consider that the search powers in ss 38(c)-(e) of the Bill are reasonable, and therefore consistent with s 21 of the Bill of Rights Act. This is because: a. the search powers contribute to...
...Section 21 of the Bill of Rights Act affirms that everyone has the right to be secure against unreasonable search or seizure, whether of the person, property, or correspondence or otherwise. The right protects a number of values including personal privacy, dignity, and property.1 8. Clause 12 of the Bill inserts the warrantless search power, that is currently in s 105(2) and (3) of the principal Act, as new s 104(3)(c). New s 104(3)(c) provides that any constable or chief executive (act...
...person’s possessory interest in property falls relatively easily within that plain language. However, we note that the Court of Appeal has referred to the "touchstone" in s 21 BORA being "the protection of reasonable expectations of privacy."[8] 19. However, the New Zealand jurisprudence has been somewhat inconsistent in the application of this concept to particular fact situations. In the early case of Alwen Industries v Comptroller of Customs[9] Blanchard J had to...
...authorities to maintain and publish the register of pecuniary and other specified interests. 6. The Bill creates an offence for members who do not meet the responsibilities provided for in the Bill. 7. The Bill makes a consequential amendment to the Privacy Act 1993 to recognise the register as a public register. We note the Privacy Act 1993 was repealed on 1 December 2020 and replaced with the Privacy Act 2020. The drafting of the Bill would need to be amended to reflect this....