Overview: The Interpreter Services Quality Framework (Quality Framework) describes how interpreting should be delivered in courts and tribunals and sets out the conduct we expect of all court-appointed interpreters. We may make minor changes to the quality framework from time to time.
The Quality Framework will help ensure interpreter services are high quality and nationally consistent. We also want to ensure interpreters are supported to work in the complex court and tribunal environment. This is important as interpreters play a fundamental role in ensuring justice is equally available to all court participants, regardless of the language they use.
The Quality Framework introduces minimum qualifications required to be a court-appointed interpreter and describes how the service should be delivered in courts and tribunals. It also sets out a code of conduct we expect all Ministry court-appointed interpreters to follow. It’s important everyone involved in the delivery of interpreter services is familiar with the standards and processes outlined in the framework.
Read our Ministry’s Interpreter Services Quality Framework [PDF, 1 MB]
Read our brief factsheet introducing the Quality Framework [PDF, 123 KB]
There are also two factsheets covering the most operational aspects of the framework, which should be useful for court staff and lawyers as well as interpreters:
Read: Identifying if someone needs an interpreter [PDF, 176 KB]
Read: Conducting proceedings with interpreters [PDF, 117 KB]
The Quality Framework also forms part of the Standard Terms and Conditions for Interpreters in Courts and Tribunals (Standard Terms), which apply to every booking agreement made by our Ministry. The Standard Terms require that the interpreter comply with the quality framework while providing their services.
Read our Ministry’s Standard Terms and Conditions for Interpreters in Courts and Tribunals
The code of conduct within the Quality Framework clearly sets out the expected behaviour of court-appointed interpreters. It is the Ministry’s expectation that independent, and Language Service Provider (LSP) interpreters are aware of the professional conduct expected of them when working in the court or tribunal.
The code of conduct includes:
Read the Code of Conduct in full [PDF, 211 KB]
Courts are generally formal places. Make sure you know what’s expected of you before you provide interpreters services in a court or tribunal.
Read about what to expect at court
Interpreters are considered ‘Officers of the Court,’ and have the overriding duty to assist the court or tribunal impartially. This overrides any duty to the parties in a case.
The interpreter’s main task is to interpret statements, evidence, and legal exchanges for those who find it hard to understand or respond in English. It’s important to remember that an interpreter must not act in any way as an advocate for the person they’re providing interpreter services for (for example, trying to influence a case on behalf of that person or anyone else participating in the hearing).
An interpreter must demonstrate professional behaviour by:
Interpreters must keep all case information confidential, unless a court or tribunal orders them to disclose it.
Interpreters may be given documents about the case in advance to help them prepare for the hearing. If this happens, the interpreter must keep these documents confidential. The documents may include a copy of the charges, summary of facts, witness statements, and expert witness briefs. In cases where there is simultaneous interpretation, such as a jury trial, the interpreter may be given the lawyer’s opening and closing addresses or the judge’s summing up.
You must keep all details relating to a case confidential. There may also be suppression orders in place.
Read more about name suppression
The Ministry of Justice Privacy Guidelines for providers of Justice Services are a useful resource that can help you keep information confidential and secure, and meet our requirements in the Standard Terms. You can read the guidelines on our website:
Privacy Guidelines for providers of Justice Services
It is expected that interpreters will maintain the appropriate dress standard to reflect the function of the court. No hats, sunglasses, jeans, gang affiliated symbols or casual clothes are to be worn.
An interpreter must arrive 15 minutes before the hearing is scheduled to begin and must return from any breaks on time for the recommencement of the hearing. This requirement applies when you are providing interpreter services in person (at court or at the tribunal) or remotely. The 15 minutes before the hearing is included in your chargeable time.
A judge of the High Court, Court of Appeal, and Supreme Court is referred to as “Justice” followed by their surname.
A judge of the District Court or other court (such as Employment Court or Environment Court) is referred to as “Judge” followed by their surname.
A judge may also be addressed as “Your Honour”, “Sir” or “Ma’am”
In te reo Māori, a Judge is addressed as “E te Kaiwhakawā” and Chief Justice as “E te Kaiwhakawā Matua.”
A community magistrate or justice of the peace is addressed as “Your Worship,” “Sir” or “Ma’am”
A referee will instruct parties at the start of the hearing on how they’d like to be addressed.
An interpreter must not interrupt the judicial officer when they are speaking.
Unless told not to, an interpreter must stand when speaking to a judicial officer, or when they are spoken to by a judicial officer.
Court and tribunal officials can help interpreters with any questions about court or tribunal procedures. Officials in the courtroom such as the Registrar (court taker) or Crier (in a jury trial) oversee the running of the court and tribunal process, including swearing in witnesses and interpreters. This can include the transfer of documents between lawyers and the presiding officer and displaying evidence (exhibits) to witnesses and the jury.
Interpreters are allowed to take notes in hearings. Interpreters must comply with the Privacy Act whilst doing so and must ensure that all notes are kept secure to ensure information about the hearing remains confidential.
This page was last updated: