Search Results

1. Vincent v Kennedy - Estate of Carol Fleet (2019) 185 Taitokerau MB 148 (185 TTK 148) [pdf, 328 KB]

   ...Paul.Majurey@ahlmlaw.com D Abbot, 22 Seymour Street, St Mary’s Bay, Auckland 1011 dabbott@xtra.co.nz mailto:cameron@bennion.co.nz mailto:Paul.Majurey@ahlmlaw.com mailto:dabbott@xtra.co.nz 185 Taitokerau MB 149 Introduction [1] Applications have been filed to succeed to the interests of the late Carol Ngawhira Tainui Fleet. Through various provisions in her will, Ms Fleet left her interests to Nathan Kennedy. The issue in this case is whether Mr Kennedy can succeed to thos...

2. [2018] NZEmpC 74 Pitman v Advanced Personnel Services Ltd [pdf, 288 KB]

   ...Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for a stay of execution BETWEEN GRAHAM REGINALD PITMAN Plaintiff AND ADVANCED PERSONNEL SERVICES LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the papers filed on 28 March, 27 April, and 21, 28 and 30 May 2018 Appearances: S Zindel, counsel for plaintiff J Goldstein, counsel for defendant Judgment: 2 July 2018 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE K G SMITH APPLICATIO...

3. [2018] NZEnvC 162 Doig v Marlborough District Council [pdf, 3.2 MB]

   ...facilities') . [3] On 1 May 2018 this court issued an interim decision allowing the appeal in part. This granted consent for the boatshed and jetty on the basis that it did not include the sanitation facilities. The parties were directed to file further submissions on the wording of conditions. Costs were reserved' A final decision was issued on 2 July 2018, attaching the finalised conditions and providing a timetable for any issues as to costs. 2 [4] This decision determi...

4. [2020] NZREADT 23 - SureCapital Real Estate Limited (12 June 2020) [pdf, 179 KB]

   ...72(b) of the Act. We do not consider it necessary to make a finding of unsatisfactory conduct under s 72(c). [57] Mr Rea indicated that the determination as to penalty may be made on the papers. Submissions on behalf of the Committee are to be filed and served within 15 working days of the date of this decision. Submissions on behalf of SureCapital are to be filed and served within a further 15 working days after receipt of the Committee’s submissions. If the Committee wished...

5. Gravatt v Bulmer (Strike-Out Application) [2014] NZHRRT 40 [pdf, 81 KB]

   ...the following terms: I write further to Dr Lance Gravatt’s complaint about the care provided to his son, Zachary, by your client, Dr David Bulmer. I apologise for the delay in writing to you again. After carefully reviewing all information on file, I have made a decision, in accordance with section 38(1) of the Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994, to take no further action on this aspect of Dr Gravatt’s complaint. I have attached the relevant parts of my letter to Dr Grava...

6. [2016] NZEmpC 162 Broadspectrum v Nathan [pdf, 119 KB]

   ...Zealand) Ltd [2015] NZERA Wellington 120. 3 Nathan v Transfield Services (New Zealand) Ltd, above n 1, at [86]. 4. Mr Nathan is awarded costs in the Authority proceeding in the amount of $7,000. [5] This application for a stay was filed on 10 November 2016 and supported by affidavits from Mr Proffitt and Ms Wilkinson. The application for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal was filed on 14 November 2016. The Court of Appeal has not yet allocated a hearing date for t...

7. LCRO 108/2018 WR v NS (23 August 2019) [pdf, 243 KB]

   ...enquiry ought to be made, and to be able to undertake basic steps that can assure them of their client’s legal capacity. The necessity for such enquiry is particularly clear where mental health has been raised. [24] The Committee referred to file notes made by Mr WR in 2013 and 2014 where he specifically recorded his view that Mr EU had the required capacity to make decisions at that time. The Committee considered the fact that Mr WR had made these

8. Chief Executive Expenses: 1 February 2019 - 30 June 2019 [xlsx, 68 KB]

   Guidance for agencies Chief Executive Expense Disclosures: A Guide for Agency Staff The following is a summary from "Chief Executive Expense Disclosures: A Guide for Agency Staff": http://www.ssc.govt.nz/sites/all/files/ce-expense-disclosures-guide-agency-staff-2017.docx Please read that in full first. In the following worksheets, cells shaded light blue require input. All other cells are locked to prevent change. Purpose The purpose of regular public disclosure of Chief Execut...

9. LCRO 150/2018 LO v RS, NL and TA (28 June 2019) [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...had failed to follow Mr LO’s instructions or had carried out work without his instructions. [31] The Committee held that the practitioners were “entitled to the reimbursement of their time and expenses.”3 Review Application [32] Mr LO filed his application for review on 8 August 2018. The grounds may be summarised as follows: (a) He did not pay the lawyers for advice; he paid them to lodge an appeal. (b) He had previously paid another lawyer for the relevant advice in 2...

10. Ha v The Real Estate Agents Authority (CAC 412) and Griffiths [2018] NZREADT 57 [pdf, 369 KB]

    ...plaintiff, The Professionals. Mr Griffiths then brought a complaint against Mr Ha which has led to the present proceedings. [7] The background to the present appeal is accurately summarised in the submissions which counsel for the first respondent filed: 1.1 Don Ha appeals a decision of Complaints Assessment Committee 412 (Committee) finding that he engaged in unsatisfactory conduct in that: (a) he failed to clearly explain to the complainant, David Griffiths, that by enter...