Search Results

1. [2020] NZEmpC 82 Hong v Chevron Traffic Services Ltd [pdf, 147 KB]

   ...discounting factor but that there still should be an award of costs in favour of the defendant rather than a nil award. He points out that even though Mr Hong’s financial position is poor, he is in full-time employment and has sought leave to appeal the Court’s judgment. [7] The Court exercises a broad discretion in awarding costs. That discretion must be exercised on a principled basis and in the interests of justice. The establishment of the Court’s Guidelines Scale was...

2. IPT-Form-7-Application-for-determination-of-failure-to-meet-conditions-of-suspension-of-liability-for-deportation-v2-Apr-23.pdf [pdf, 494 KB]

   ...Other (specify) Organisation name (if applicable) 2B: Please provide a current address in New Zealand to which communications relating to the matter may be sent (this cannot be a PO Box). Notices, documents, and information relating to this appeal will be sent to this address. Street number / Street name Suburb Town / City Post code 2C: Representative’s contact details Daytime contact phone number ( ) Other contact phone number ( ) Fax number ( )...

3. LCRO Definitions [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...account received from the practitioner. Cancellation of registration To cancel the registration of the conveyancer and effectively withdraw the powers of the practitioner to practice their professional duties. Censure Defined by the Court of Appeal as synonymous with reprimand. It means a formal or official statement rebuking a practitioner for unsatisfactory conduct. Complaint Under the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, a complaint may relate to: • conduct • sta...

4. [2024] NZLVT 014 - McEnnallay v Auckland Council (5 April 2024) [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...onus of proof on the objection lay on Mr Gilbert as the objector. The initial revaluation signed by a registered valuer in the name of the Valuer- General was presumptively correct. Mr Gilbert – both before the Tribunal, and before this Court on appeal – had the affirmative burden. It was not enough for Mr Gilbert – through Mr Robinson – to show that the scales were even at the end of the hearing. He had to show that the Valuer-General was wrong. In this case, the parties hav...

5. [2024] NZLVT 064 - Lamb v Carterton District Council (19 December 2024) [pdf, 145 KB]

   ...The onus of proof on the objection lay on Mr Gilbert as the objector. The initial revaluation signed by a registered valuer in the name of the Valuer- General was presumptively correct. Mr Gilbert - both before the Tribunal, and before this Court on appeal - had the affirmative burden. It was not enough for Mr Gilbert - through Mr Robinson - to show that the scales were even at the end of the hearing. He had to show that the Valuer-General was wrong. [8] In this case, the parties have...

6. Compulsory Treatment Orders

   ...doctor or other qualified person to prepare a report about the person’s condition. The court may also call witnesses to give evidence about the person. Usually, the person will attend the hearing. The hearing is private and not open to the public. Appealing compulsory treatment The person’s caregiver, welfare guardian or mental health officers can ask for the decision to be reviewed by a review tribunal. Extending a CTO The maximum amount of time a CTO can apply for is 6 months. It can be s...

   Located in:

   1. Family >
   2. Court ordered treatment >
   3. Mental health treatment

7. Biography

   ...work very closely with victims, in a victim-focused, trauma-informed way. I have a strong media presence and have supported victims and their whānau through all tiers of the justice system, from the District Courts to the High Court, to the Court of Appeal, all the way to the Supreme Court. I have supported victims through laying complaints with the Ombudsman and the Privacy Commission, to making complaints to the New Zealand Human Rights Review Tribunal. Often, I worked with individuals for y...

   Located in:

   1. Chief Victims Advisor

8. Protocol as to Environment Court Judgment delivery expectations

   ...delivered in the Environment Court within 1 month, 3 months and 6 months’ time frames for the 12 months ending 31 December 2018. Type of proceedings 1 month or less 3 months of less 6 months or less Total Judgments delivered Consent Appeals 60% 25% 15% 67 Plans/Plan Changes 43% 30% 27% 40 Other 66% 19% 15% 143       Total       250

   Located in:

   1. Environment Court >
   2. Decisions & publications

9. ENV-2020-AKL-000094

   Appeal ENV-2020-AKL-000094 Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of New Zealand Incorporated v Waikato Regional Council ENV-2020-AKL-000094 Notice of partial withdrawal s274 interested parties Bathurst and BT Beef+Lamb New Zealand Limited Contact Energy Limited Dairy NZ Limited Federated Farmers of New Zealand Fonterra Co-operative Group Limited Genesis Energy Limited Genetic Technologies Limited Graeme Gleeson Hamilton City Council Horticulture New Zealand King Country Energy Limited -...

   Located in:

   1. Environment Court >
   2. Environment Court cases online >
   3. Waikato Regional Council Plan Change 1

10. ENV-2020-AKL-000097

    Appeal ENV-2020-AKL-000097 DairyNZ Limited v Waikato Regional Council s274 interested parties Auckland/Waikato Fish and Game Council Ballance Agri-Nutrients Limited Beef+Lamb New Zealand Limited CNI Iwi Land Management Limited Farmers for Positive Change Federated Farmers of New Zealand Genetic Technologies Limited G Pinnell Graeme Gleeson Horticulture New Zealand Landcorp Farming Limited Matamata-Piako District Council Mercury NZ Limited Miraka Limited OJI Fibre Solutions NZ Limited Potato...

    Located in:

    1. Environment Court >
    2. Environment Court cases online >
    3. Waikato Regional Council Plan Change 1