[2024] NZEmpC 84 E Tū Inc v Singh [pdf, 378 KB]
...the fact that Mr Singh was supporting an employer not an employee, together with Mr Singh’s alleged failure to understand why E tū would have a concern about that. I return to this issue later. [24] On 22 July Ms Mackintosh wrote to Mr Singh requesting a meeting at 4pm the next day. Mr Singh requested a deferral to the following week in order to arrange representation, which Ms Mackintosh agreed to. [25] Later in the day (22 July) Ms Mackintosh was contacted by HVF who advised...