Search Results

1. 2023 NZPSPLA 085.pdf [pdf, 76 KB]

   [2023] NZPSPLA 085 IN THE MATTER OF A complaint by Police against AB filed under the Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act 2010 (the Act) HEARD on the papers by consent DECISION [1] In May 2022 I granted Mr AB’s application for a certificate of approval in the class of security technician. Police had objected to his application, but Mr AB had provided evidence that he was addressing his health and alcohol issues and was therefore suitable to be...

2. 2023 NZPSPLA 066 [pdf, 74 KB]

   [2023] NZPSPLA 066 IN THE MATTER OF A complaint by the POLICE against JESSE RANUI pursuant to section 74(1) of the Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act 2010 DECISION [1] Jesse Ranui initially applied for a Certificate of Approval (COA), in the classes of crowd controller, document destruction agent, personal guard and property guard in May 2023. The Police objected to his application on the basis of recent convictions for failing to com...

3. 2023 NZPSPLA 066 [pdf, 74 KB]

   [2023] NZPSPLA 066 IN THE MATTER OF A complaint by the POLICE against JESSE RANUI pursuant to section 74(1) of the Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act 2010 DECISION [1] Jesse Ranui initially applied for a Certificate of Approval (COA), in the classes of crowd controller, document destruction agent, personal guard and property guard in May 2023. The Police objected to his application on the basis of recent convictions for failing to com...

4. 2024 NZPSPLA 082.pdf [pdf, 83 KB]

   [2024] NZPSPLA 082 IN THE MATTER OF A complaint under s 74 of The Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act 2010 (the Act) against LARS-BJORN BRANDT HEARD remotely on 2 October 2024 APPEARANCES Snr Constable A Tangney for NZ Police L Brandt – no appearance DECISION [1] Police consider Lars-Bjorn Brandt is no longer suitable to be a certificate holder because of the number of anti-social and aggressive incidents in which he has been involved in the last...

5. 2024 NZPSPLA 116.pdf [pdf, 74 KB]

   [2024] NZPSPLA 116 IN THE MATTER OF A complaint under s 74 of The Private Security Personnel and Private Investigators Act 2010 (the Act) against SHARAN RAYILLA HEARD remotely on 11 December 2024 APPEARANCES Snr Constable J Donaldson for NZ Police S Rayilla – no appearance DECISION [1] Police have made a complaint against Sharan Rayilla as they say he is guilty of misconduct and is no longer suitable to be a certificate holder. Police advise that while Mr Rayilla...

6. CN v NK [2023] NZDT 640 (17 November 2023) [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...PLEASE NOTE: A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. Grounds for Appeal There are very limited grounds for appealing a decision of the Tribunal. Specifically, the Referee conducted the proceedings (or a Tribunal investigator carried out an enquiry) in a way that was unfair and prejudiced the result of the proceedings. This means you consider there was a breach of natural justice, as a result of procedural unfairness that affected the result of the pr...

7. [2024] NZEnvC 295 Cooper v Kaipara District Council [pdf, 803 KB]

   ...and • Have professional indemnity insurance to the value of at least $1,000,000. The engineering plans, calculations and specifications shall include, but may not be limited to the following: 3.h)i. Design details of the construction of the private roads, which shall comply as far as practicable with Section 5 of the Council’s Engineering Standards 2011, and shall be consistent with the details in the relevant plans in the Project Roading and Pavement plans (project reference...

8. SN v EH [2024] NZDT 763 (13 November 2024) [pdf, 253 KB]

   ...result? (d) If so, is SN entitled to a remedy and is the amount claimed proved and reasonable? CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 6 Did EH make a representation to SN about the condition of the [Boat]? 7. The general rule that applies to the private sale of goods is the rule of Caveat Emptor (‘let the buyer beware’), and there is generally no warranty regarding the quality of the goods or their fitness for purpose. This means that, during contractual negotiations, a seller i...

9. RT Ltd v LC [2020] NZDT 1413 (27 July 2020) [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...behalf and is entitled to make this claim in its own right. Did LC consent to accepting the risk of being clamped and being required to pay a fee to have the clamp removed? 6. If a land occupier gives clear notice the land is not available for private parking, that a person breaching the notice may be clamped and a fee charged to remove a clamp then a person breaching the clear notice is deemed to have accepted the risk of clamping and an associated fee. 7. NU, the director of...

10. Faleauto v GH LCRO 100/2015 (29 November 2016) [pdf, 107 KB]

    ...invoice. He says he did not realise that “an invoice had to be issued under TAR10 even if the money had been earned”. He says he has learned from his involvement in the complaints process, and attributes his errors to his unfamiliarity with private client work, his practise being primarily funded through legal aid. [13] Mr Faleauto also minimised the significance of having lost the client’s file, saying that was a unique event in circumstances where he was closing his prac...