XH v T Ltd [2024] NZDT 410 (2 May 2024) [pdf, 199 KB]
...outcome to be that XH compensates T Ltd $287.50 for the time that it spent prior to the contract being cancelled. This is for the following reasons: a. T Ltd had not performed the carpet laying services in the contract. It had however utilised resource making four visits to the client site as follows: i. Visit 1 on 27 October 2023 to assess the job and provide a quote. I do not find that is reasonable for T Ltd to be compensated for this visit as it would have incurred this cost r...