You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.

Helpful search tips:

  • If you are doing a keyword search (eg. misconduct), please note that this search will only produce decisions where the keyword appears in the title or decision description.
  • If you want to search the entire decision document for certain keywords, you will need to use full website search located in the top right hand corner of this page.
Search results

563 items matching your search terms

  1. National Standards Committee 1 v Young [2020] NZLCDT 20 (10 July 2020) [PDF, 289 KB]

    Liability / Standards Committee charged practitioner with negligence or incompetence / provided legal services without notifying employer or having the skills, experience or supervision to do so / not keeping a proper file, with adverse effects for client / later tried to persuade client to withdraw complaint / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 7 / rule 7.1 / rule 13.3 / HELD / client significantly hampered in managing their case due to lack of English language ability / practitioner and client accepted written terms of engagement, not “limited terms” suggested by practitioner / negligent or incompetent conduct in relation to file management, client representation at court hearing, advice on discovery, method of providing a non-English speaking deponent’s evidence, and failing to obtain adequate supervision / misconduct found / attempting to persuade client to withdraw complaint was unsatisfactory conduct

  2. Otago Standards Committee v Zhao [2020] NZLCDT 19 (6 July 2020) [PDF, 111 KB]

    Liability / practitioner previously ordered by Tribunal to complete trust account supervisor course / current charge for failing to comply with that order / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Trust Account) Regulations 2008, regulation 19 / schedule 1 / schedule 2 / HELD / Law Society runs two trust account supervisor courses, a beginner course with an exam, and a refresher course / Tribunal order was unspecific in face of two options / practitioner eligible under Regulations to take refresher course / Committee assumed attendance at refresher course was non-compliance / practitioner enrolled in beginner course but postponed for medical reasons / advised by Law Society that the Regulations permitted him to complete refresher course / in context of approaching the matter with some persistence, delay from November 2017 to February 2018 insufficient to establish offence / charge dismissed

  3. Auckland Standards Committee 2 v Burcher [2020] NZLCDT 18 (30 June 2020) [PDF, 145 KB]

    Penalty / misconduct and unsatisfactory conduct / practitioner performed legal work as a solicitor/trustee while suspended / breach of LCDT orders / High Court appeal confirmed four particulars as disgraceful or dishonourable / Burcher v Auckland Standards Committee 5 [2020] NZHC 43 / Central Standards Committee v Meyrick [2018] NZLCDT 28 / Auckland Standards Committees 3 and 4 v Banbrook [2017] NZLCDT 35 / HELD / no criticism of work performed for clients / harm to credibility of disciplinary system / suspended trustee lawyer must engage another lawyer to carry out legal work / not most serious breach of suspension order, but all breaches are serious / in context of dysfunctional partnership / did not charge for work / conduct occurred four years ago / aggravating feature: third appearance before LCDT / public protection not required / Tribunal ordered two-month suspension and censure / practitioner to pay two-thirds of Standards Committee’s costs and reimburse full Tribunal’s costs

  4. Auckland Standards Committee 1 v Arman [2020] NZLCDT 17 (22 June 2020) [PDF, 289 KB]

    Liability and penalty / misconduct or unsatisfactory conduct / criminal proceedings / practitioner did not appear or respond / Tribunal concluded service was properly effected and practitioner waived right to appear / practitioner charged for failing to serve client’s best interests in criminal proceedings / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 9.5 / rule 13.1 / HELD / wilful breach of  obligation to advise client on eligibility for legal aid / remaining charges established, to at least a reckless level / misconduct charge proved / High Court found miscarriage of justice requiring conviction to be set aside / high end of misconduct spectrum / practitioner previously suspended for 10 months for serious misconduct involving a client who was pressured into a guilty plea / Tribunal ordered practitioner be struck off / practitioner to refund $8,385 to complainant and to pay Standards Committee’s and Tribunal’s costs

  5. Auckland Standards Committee 5 v Ellis [2020] NZLCDT 16 (8 June 2020) [PDF, 98 KB]

    Penalty / practitioner previously struck off / outstanding charges dealt with by finding of misconduct by consent, on the basis of all other charges being withdrawn by leave of the Tribunal / Standards Committee did not seek further compensation in this jurisdiction / parties agreed that appropriate penalty was censure and costs / only remaining issue quantum of costs / HELD / Tribunal ordered censure / practitioner to pay Standards Committee’s and Tribunal’s costs / however practitioner should not have to pay costs for filing amended charges where Tribunal considered original charges to be “somewhat defective” / also costs should be reduced to reflect attendances for a compensation claim which was not ultimately pursued