You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.

Helpful search tips:

  • If you are looking for a specific decision with a forward slash in the title (eg, 123/2014), you will need to replace the forward slash with a space (eg, 123 2014), as the website cannot pick up on forward slashes (/) or any other characters.
  • If you are doing a keyword search (eg. misconduct), please note that this search will only produce decisions where the keyword appears in the title or decision description. If you want to search the entire decision document for certain keywords, you will need to use full website search located in the top right hand corner of this page.
  • If you want to search for a decision from a particular jurisdiction using the full website search, put both the jurisdiction name and the keyword in the search field (eg, LCRO misconduct).
Search results

1358 items matching your search terms

  1. LCRO 21/2019 IV v EC and HL (21 December 2020) [PDF, 216 KB]

    Review / Committee declined to take further action / enduring power of attorney and property transfer / complaint lawyer did not properly determine whether complainant had capacity when executing powers of attorney, and that another lawyer acted on property transfer despite conflict of interest / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 6.1 / rule 6.2 / rule 6.3 / HELD / no longer practicable to investigate capacity complaint due to passage of time / breach of rule 6.1 / interests of vendor and purchaser did not align / no evidence clients provided informed consent / information barrier discussed, not a cure for failing to obtain informed consent / Committee’s decision confirmed as to capacity complaint, reversed as to conflict of interest / unsatisfactory conduct found / no further orders made / section 211(1)(a)
  2. LCRO 14/2020 CL v BB (18 December 2020) [PDF, 150 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action / trust and estate dispute / complaint lawyer did not meet duty of care, failed to act promptly and charged excessive fees / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 9 / rule 9.1 / HELD / no evidence lawyer committed to resolving dispute within short timeframe / miscommunication about request for documents already provided by complainant not unsatisfactory conduct / liability for fees for reviewing financial statements not dependent on finding irregularities / fee complaint regarding minute disputes for properly chargeable fees not upheld / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  3. LCRO 166/2020 GM - Application for review of a prosecutorial decision (18 December 2020) [PDF, 174 KB]

    Committee referred conduct complaint to Disciplinary Tribunal / allegation lawyer inappropriately transferred funds from trust account / Orlov v New Zealand Law Society [2013] NZCA 230 / Zhao v Legal Complaints Review Officer [2016] NZHC 2622 / HELD / Committees are not required to provide reasons to refer conduct to Disciplinary Tribunal / evidence does not conclusively demonstrate any breaches are inadvertent errors / proper matters for Tribunal to consider / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  4. LCRO 83/2020 BA v SC (18 December 2020) [PDF, 265 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action / trust funds / complaint lawyer received trust funds from trustee and followed instructions to pay funds to trustee’s company / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 4.1 / rule 4.2 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, section 110 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Trust Account Regulations) Regulations 2008, regulation 12 / Fletcher v Eden Refuge Trust [2012] NZCA 124 / Trust Account Guidelines / HELD / other than being instructing solicitor on proceedings to remove trustee, no evidence produced that lawyer knew trustee not entitled to funds / issue yet to be determined in court / lawyer could have asked for copy of trustee resolution authorising payment, or terminated retainer / however, no contravention of trust account rules on the evidence / without further information, lawyer obliged to carry out instructions / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  5. LCRO 14/2020 CL v BB (18 December 2020) [PDF, 141 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action / trust and estate dispute / complaint lawyer did not meet duty of care, failed to act promptly and charged excessive fees / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 9 / rule 9.1 / HELD / no evidence lawyer committed to resolving dispute within short timeframe / miscommunication about request for documents already provided by complainant not unsatisfactory conduct / liability for fees for reviewing financial statements not dependent on finding irregularities / fee complaint regarding minute disputes for properly chargeable fees not upheld / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  6. LCRO 189/2019 RT v AC (30 November 2020) [PDF, 248 KB]

    Review / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / conveyancing transaction / complaint lawyer invoiced clients when not involved in sale, did not provide new lawyer with access to e-dealing and fees were not fair and reasonable / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 4.3 / rule 4.4 / rule 9 / rule 9.1 / HELD / lawyer provided undertaking with irrevocable instructions to purchaser’s solicitor in exchange for 50 per cent deposit to be paid / Committee’s decision to accept cost assessor’s report not well founded / cost assessor estimated time spent on matter and did not take into account particulars of this transaction / not referred back due to time elapsed / new lawyer should have set up fresh e-dealing / Committee’s decision reversed / section 211(1)(a)
  7. LCRO 24/2020 TN v [Area] Standards Committee [X] (30 November 2020) [PDF, 210 KB]

    Review / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / Family Court proceedings / own motion investigation lawyer did not comply with notice of requirement to produce letter sent to Family Court / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, section 147 / Beckham v R [2015] NZSC 98 / HELD / lawyer claimed letter was privileged and instructed by client not to release it and to minimise communications / privilege claim probably without foundation / original complainant and Committee could have obtained letter from Family Court, and did so during course of complaint / not satisfied conduct requires a disciplinary response / Committee’s decision reversed / section 211(1)(a)
  8. LCRO 140/2020 AB v RP (27 November 2020) [PDF, 267 KB]

    Complaint / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / conveyancing transaction / complaint lawyer did not provide terms of engagement and deducted trust funds without authority / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, section 110 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Trust Account) Regulations 2008, regulation 9 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3.4 / rule 3.5 / rule 3.6 / rule 9.3 / HELD / breach of rule 3.4 / prior terms of engagement did not remain accurate, nor was this considered at the time for the purpose of rule 3.6 / breach of rule 9.3 and reg 9 / lawyer did not have authority to deduct funds for reg 9(1)(a) / regs 9 and 10 demand strict compliance / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  9. LCRO 191/2019 UY v FB (26 November 2020) [PDF, 266 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action / Family Court proceedings / complaint opposing lawyer described complainant’s protection order application as a parenting order “in drag” and failed to serve a memorandum / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Complaints Service and Standards Committees) Regulations 2008, reg 9 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 12 / HELD / procedural fairness / complaints service did not forward complaint to lawyer / discussed complaint with lawyer in phone call / explanations in call not provided to complainant / no evidence complaint inquiry was materially compromised / no breach of rule 12 / no evidence lawyer knew comment would cause distress / presiding judge best placed to evaluate conduct / no evidence of judge’s concern about comment or service of memorandum / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  10. Ref: LCRO 99/2019 SQ v LP (27 October 2020) [PDF, 235 KB]

    Review / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / civil proceedings / complaint lawyer refused to issue proceedings and duplicated work / fee complaint / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 1.2 / rule 9 / rule 9.1 / HELD / no evidence complainant instructed lawyer to issue proceedings / Standards Committee directed to reconsider fee complaint / section 209(1)(a) / Committee’s decision otherwise confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  11. LCRO 134/2019 NM v LL (23 October 2020) [PDF, 207 KB]

    Review / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / Waitangi Tribunal claim / complaint lawyer did not provide client file to complainant and did not have authority to act / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 1.2 / rule 4.4 / rule 4.4.1 / HELD / no breach of rule 4.4.1 / complainant not entitled to require uplift of file as they were not a client / Committee’s decision confirmed but modified to record any further action on complaint is unnecessary or inappropriate / section 211(1)(a)
  12. LCRO 29/2019 HM v PL (22 October 2020) [PDF, 189 KB]

    Review / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / estate matter / complaint lawyer did not treat complainant with respect and courtesy or promptly answer requests for information, and failed to disclose documents / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3.1 / rule 7 / rule 7.2 / rule 9.4 / second complaint / HELD / respect and courtesy, and requests for information complaints determined in first complaint / no breach of rule 7 / complainant was not lawyer’s client / no breach of rule 9.4 / lawyer not able to provide estimate / Committee’s decision reversed as to unsatisfactory conduct findings, otherwise confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  14. LCRO 55/2020 MY v KA (5 October 2020) [PDF, 182 KB]

    Review / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / conveyancing transaction / complaint lawyer misspelt client’s name on title and did not follow instructions to correct mistake / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3 / rule 11 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, section 137 / section 138 / complainant asked to withdraw complaint / HELD / complainant’s wishes on progressing complaint not determinative / when complainant asks to withdraw complaint, Committee’s role is to weigh request against public interest requirements / breach of rule 3 / failed to act in a timely way to correct mistake and disregarded instructions to do so / breach of rule 11 / responses to complaint and inquiry failed to preserve reputation of legal profession / Committee’s decision modified as to scope of rule 11 breach, otherwise confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  15. LCRO 24/2019 UC v SO (30 September 2020) [PDF, 156 KB]

    Review / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / criminal proceedings / complaint lawyer did not return memory stick and did not give invoice for cash payment of fees / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3.4A / rule 14.2 / rule 14.10 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Trust Account) Regulations 2008, regulation 9 / regulation 10 / Skagen v Wellington Standards Committee [2016] NZHC 1772 / HELD / breach of rule 3.4A / no evidence terms of engagement provided / breach of rule 14.2(e), rule 14.10, and regulations 9 and 10 / no evidence invoices sent / memory stick complaint resolved by Disputes Tribunal / Committee’s decision confirmed but modified to conditionally increase fine / section 211(1)(a)
  16. LCRO 5/2020 AJ v BN (30 September 2020) [PDF, 263 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / conveyancing transaction / complaint lawyer failed to advise on land covenants, did not act in a timely manner and did not promptly address internal complaint / Burgess v Tait [2014] NZHC 2408 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3 / rule 3.8 / rule 5.11 / rule 7 / rule 7.1 / HELD / breach of rules 3, 7 and 7.1 / lawyer admitted they failed to advise about land covenant / however, breaches do not call for a disciplinary sanction / no professional standards issue with internal complaint process / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  17. LCRO 104/2020 LN v RT (30 September 2020) [PDF, 127 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / family proceedings / complaint opposing party’s evidence was incomplete and lawyer provided false certificate / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 2.5 / rule 12 / HELD / lawyer obliged to protect and promote their client’s interests / materials suggest that court was satisfied with opposing party’s affidavit / no evidence of professional standards issue / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  18. LCRO 158/2018 YCH v TSR (30 September 2020) [PDF, 396 KB]

    Review / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / estate administration / complaint lawyer administered estate to benefit one beneficiary, and provided beneficiaries with advice when their interests conflicted / fee complaint / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 6 / rule 6.1 / rule 6.1.2 / rule 12 / Hartlepool v Basildon LCRO 79/2009 / Sadler v Public Trust [2009] NZCA 364 / Hansen v Young [2004] 1 NZLR 37 (CA) / HELD / lawyer objectively advised beneficiaries until recommending they obtain independent legal advice / breach of rules 6 and 6.1 / realised estate asset to the benefit of one beneficiary / breach of rule 12 / did not keep other beneficiaries informed of progress on realising estate / Committee’s decision modified to reduce fine, reversed as to fee refund / Committee directed to reconsider whether entire fees fair and reasonable / section 211(1)(a)
  19. LCRO 72/2020 ZW v CB (29 September 2020) [PDF, 204 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / civil dispute / complaint lawyer was incompetent, provided negligent advice, breached duty of care, and provided poor service / fee complaint / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3 / rule 9 / rule 9.1 / HELD / lawyer provided competent representation throughout retainer / advised on options and kept complainant informed / fees fair and reasonable having regard to relevant fee factors / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  20. LCRO 162/2018 BQ v XR (29 September 2020) [PDF, 267 KB]

    Review / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / relationship property matter / complaint lawyer unnecessarily edited settlement agreement and provided incompetent advice / fee complaint / Property (Relationships) Act 1976 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3 / rule 9 / rule 9.1 / Hunstanton v Cambourne LCRO 167/2009 / HELD / breach of rules 9 and 9.1 / significant amount of work billed neither productive nor necessary / little achieved when retainer terminated / unsatisfactory conduct found pursuant to sections 12(a) and 12(c) / Committee’s decision confirmed but modified to reduce fee reduction / section 211(1)(a)
  21. LCRO 63/2020 SJ - Application for review of a prosecutorial decision (28 September 2020) [PDF, 124 KB]

    Committee referred conduct complaint to Disciplinary Tribunal / allegation of permitting another lawyer to operate practice using lawyer’s trust account in breach of certificates / FF v Wellington Standards Committee LCRO 23/2011 / Orlov v New Zealand Law Society [2013] NZCA 230 / HELD / matter needs to be considered in forum appropriate for issues / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  22. LCRO 16/2020 PF v VJ (22 September 2020) [PDF, 243 KB]

    Review / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / franchise dispute / complaint opposing lawyer falsely issued and improperly served notice of breach, delayed responding, and made personal remarks / fee complaint / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 2.3 / rule 10.2 / rule 12 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Complaints Service and Standards Committees) Regulations 2008, regulation 29 / HELD / complaint about notice of breach is a contractual dispute for the courts, complaints process is not an alternative forum / notice of breach served directly on represented complainant in compliance with exception at rule 10.2.6 / no evidence of disrespectful correspondence / no delay in responding / no special circumstances to inquire into fee complaint / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  23. LCRO 182/2017 TP v ZN (14 September 2020) [PDF, 414 KB]

    Review / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / civil proceedings and insurance settlement / complaint lawyer provided inadequate client care information, supervised incurring expert witness expenses without instructions, continued to negotiate settlement against instructions, and disclosed privileged information / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, section 209 / section 333 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3.4 / rule 7.1 / rule 8 / rule 8.1 / rule 8.3 / rule 9.8 / rule 9.10 / rule 13.3 / HELD / breach of rule 3.4 / client care information wrong / breach of rules 8, 8.1 and 13.3 / instructing experts is a significant decision for rule 13.3, but responsible lawyer was not disciplined by Committee so adverse finding reversed / lawyer disclosed instructions to court and continued negotiations with insurer against instructions / unsatisfactory conduct found pursuant to s 12(c) / Standards Committee directed to reconsider complaints about …
  25. LCRO 18/2020 MP v LT (31 August 2020) [PDF, 202 KB]

    Review / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / civil proceedings / complaint lawyers’ fees exceeded estimate and award did not merit expenditure / fee complaint / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 9.1 / rule 9.4 / HELD / fee quickly exceeded estimate / instructions changed after estimate / Committee did not adequately address whether complainant should have been informed of escalating fees / lawyer named as party in complaint did not render invoice / Committee directed to reconsider which lawyer should be the subject of complaint, whether information on escalating fees was required, and a fair and reasonable fee amount / section 209 / Committee’s decision reversed / section 211(1)(a)