You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.

Helpful search tips:

  • If you are looking for a specific decision with a forward slash in the title (eg, 123/2014), you will need to replace the forward slash with a space (eg, 123 2014), as the website cannot pick up on forward slashes (/) or any other characters.
  • If you are doing a keyword search (eg. misconduct), please note that this search will only produce decisions where the keyword appears in the title or decision description. If you want to search the entire decision document for certain keywords, you will need to use full website search located in the top right hand corner of this page.
  • If you want to search for a decision from a particular jurisdiction using the full website search, put both the jurisdiction name and the keyword in the search field (eg, LCRO misconduct).
Search results

1358 items matching your search terms

  1. LCRO 74/2018 PG v EJ (29 November 2019) [PDF, 149 KB]

    Review / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / estate administration / complaint lawyer opposed beneficiary in family protection claim and did not provide information / fee complaint / lawyer sole executor and trustee of estate / Administration Act 1969, section 26 / Family Protection Act 1955, section 11 / Hunstanton v Cambourne LCRO 167/2009 (February 2010) / Re Murphy’s Settlements [1998] 3 All ER 1 / Jemma Trust Co Ltd v Liptrott [2003] EWCA Civ 1476 / HELD / although best practice, lawyer not required to provide bill of costs to complainant in these circumstances / lawyer’s involvement in family protection claim and payments to third parties from estate, in executor capacity / section 211(1)(b) / Committee directed to determine fee complaint / section 209(1)(a) / Committee’s decision otherwise confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  2. LCRO 96/2017 AA v BB (29 November 2019) [PDF, 203 KB]

    Review / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / conveyancing transaction settlement / complaint lawyer’s conduct created impression settlement could not take place / Court of Appeal determined lawyer’s conduct conveyed impression problem had not been solved / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3 / rule 10 / rule 10.1 / rule 11 / rule 11.1 / Fair Trading Act 1986 / BC v YT LCRO 215/2010 (April 2011) / RP v LP LCRO 292/2011 (October 2012) / JW v QE LCRO 192/2011 (September 2012) / R v D LCRO 56/2009 / HELD / breach of rule 10 and rule 10.1 / failed to advise problem solved / Committee’s decision modified to record breach of rule 10 and rule 10.1 and contravention of section 12(c) / Committee’s decision otherwise confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  4. LCRO 68/2018 TY v HG (29 November 2019) [PDF, 220 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / Commerce Commission investigation / complaint lawyer alleged breaches of consumer law / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 10.1 / rule 13 / rule 13.8 / rule 13.8.1 / rule 13.8.2 / Medcalf v Weatherill [2002] UKHL 27 / Schmidt v Pepper New Zealand (Custodians) Ltd [2012] NZCA 565 / submissions were requests for inquiry, not allegations of criminal offending / rule 13.8 requires allegations of reprehensible conduct to have reasonable grounds, not concrete evidence / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  7. LCRO 216/2018 AA v BB (28 November 2019) [PDF, 165 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / enforcement proceedings / complaint lawyer failed to competently represent client and terminated retainer without good cause / Auckland Standards Committee 3 v Castles [2013] NZLCDT 53 / LCRO 262/2014 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3 / rule 4.1 / rule 4.2 / rule 4.2.1 / HELD / evidence does not demonstrate inadequate representation / not task of Standards Committee or LCRO to provide overarching supervision of litigation strategies / lawyer did not have capacity to attend to charging order, which required urgent response / fully informed client and received instructions to transfer file / retainer ended by consent / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  8. LCRO 7/2018 AB v CD (26 November 2019) [PDF, 165 KB]

    Review / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / protection order / complaint lawyer did not provide adequate final account and exceeded estimate / fee complaint / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 7.2 / rule 9 / rule 9.3 / rule 9.4 / rule 9.6 / rule 9.7 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Trust Account) Regulations 2008, regulation 9 / regulation 10 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, section 110 / HELD / no evidence estimate was provided or that lawyer failed to provide invoice / final account met rule 9.7 / breach of rule 7.2 / did not provide information on request / lawyer stated they may withdraw discount offered if information request was sustained / Committee’s decision modified to record breach of r 7.2 / section 211(1)(a)
  9. LCRO 81/2018 QQ v RR (26 November 2019) [PDF, 548 KB]

    Review / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / Family Court proceedings / complaint lawyer failed to protect interests and act in accordance with fiduciary duties / fee complaint / Family Court set aside relationship property agreement / Committee ordered $150,000 fee refund / Property (Relationships) Act 1976, section 21 / P v H LCRO 02/2009 / TJ v DM LCRO 261/2016 / HELD / elements of joint complaint vexatious / evidence does not support allegations in complaint / Committee may not order refund exceeding fees paid / lawyer kept client informed and provided competent advice / no evidence of assurances that costs position was secure / retainer uncertain with litigation risk / no further action on fee complaint as joint complaint vexatious / section 211(1)(b) / Committee’s decision reversed / section 211(1)(a) 
  10. LCRO 37/2018 AH v OO (12 November 2019) [PDF, 166 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / conveyancing matter / complaint lawyer did not competently advise on due diligence / pre-1 August 2008 conduct / Law Practitioners Act 1982 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, section 351 / Woods v Legal Complaints Review Officer [2013] NZHC 674 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3 / HELD / advice on conveyancing was a breach of rule 3 / Committee’s decision modified to record unsatisfactory conduct pursuant to sections 12(a) and 12(c) / section 211(1)(a)
  14. LCRO 215/2018 WN v ZD (31 October 2019) [PDF, 162 KB]

    Review / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / litigation representation / complaint lawyer failed to keep client informed / whether lawyer has a duty to advise they will be unable to complete retainer due to resignation / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3 / rule 7.1 / HELD / lawyer failed to advise client they had resigned from firm / breach of rule 7.1 / apology / Committee’s decision modified to record unsatisfactory conduct pursuant to sections 12(a) and 12(c) / section 211(1)(a)
  17. LCRO 119/2018 QL v DW (22 October 2019) [PDF, 164 KB]

    Review / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / relationship property agreement / complaint lawyer failed to accurately calculate funds available to client on settlement of property sale / whether lawyer provided competent service / whether lawyer ensured client understood calculations / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3 / rule 7 / rule 7.1 / Daniels v Complaints Committee 2 of the Wellington District Law Society [2011] 3 NZLR 850 (HC) / Workington v Sheffield LCRO 55/2009 (26 August 2009) / HELD / lawyer failed to calculate net proceeds of sale accurately / did not ensure client understood calculations / $2,500 fine / Committee’s decision reversed / section 211(1)(a)
  18. LCRO 192/2017 KY v QW, Official Assignee (27 September 2019) [PDF, 141 KB]

    Review / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / dealing with bankrupt client’s funds / complaint lawyer did not disclose funds held on trust for bankrupt client to Official Assignee, and used funds to pay firm’s and barrister’s outstanding fees / Insolvency Act 2006 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, section 110 / whether firm held a lien over funds / whether lawyer entitled to rely on belief partner had approval from Official Assignee / HELD / lawyer acted without due care in contravention of Insolvency Act 2006 / Committee’s decision confirmed / reversed as to considering whether to publish practitioner’s name / section 211(1)(a)
  19. LCRO 261/2016 TJ v DM and ZP (26 September 2019) [PDF, 196 KB]

    Review / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / relationship property proceedings / widely-cast complaint that lawyers failed to act competently / fee complaint / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Client Care and Conduct) Rules 2008, rule 3 / rule 9.1 / whether Committee reviewed fee complaint correctly / HELD / no evidence of professional standards issue / brief reasons for conclusions on fee review insufficient in the circumstances / Committee did not appoint cost assessor / Committee to reconsider fee complaint / section 209(1)(a) / Committee’s decision otherwise confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  20. LCRO 13/2019 RA v LO (23 September 2019) [PDF, 146 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / protection order proceedings / complaint lawyer was rude to client, pressured client into settling, and included a clause in an undertaking without instructions / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3.1 / rule 7.1 / rule 12 / rule 13.3 / whether lawyer was discourteous / whether lawyer protected client’s interests / HELD / no evidence of professional standards issue / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  21. LCRO 194/2017 MA v NB, OC and PD (20 September 2019) [PDF, 344 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / professional discipline proceedings / complaint lawyers not competent, and conflicted with insurer / R and N Family Trust v EL LCRO 205/2015 (27 June 2019) / Nicholson v Icepak Coolstores Ltd [1999] 3 NZLR 475 (HC) / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3 / rule 6 / rule 6.1 / whether lawyers had sufficient understanding of case before providing advice / HELD / lawyers provided competent representation / no evidence that lawyers were conflicted / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  22. LCRO 130/2017 HS v NC and EH (18 September 2019) [PDF, 260 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / dispute with council and retailer / complaint lawyers acted in excess of instructions / failed to provide client care information / fee complaint / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Client Care and Conduct) Rules 2008, rule 3.4 / rule 3.6 / rule 9 / rule 9.1 / whether lawyers were instructed to act and on what basis / HELD / no evidence of professional standards issue / legal services to be provided covered by retainer and subsequent instructions / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  24. LCRO 207/2018 PC v FM (10 September 2019) [PDF, 499 KB]

    Review / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / advice on a business purchase and lease, renewal / complaint lawyer failed to competently advise client / complainant succeeded in negligence proceedings against lawyers / Yates Property Corp Pty Ltd (in liq) v Boland (1998) 85 FCR 84 (FCAFC) / Robert Bax & Associates v Cavenham Pty Ltd [2012] QCA 177, [2013] 1 Qd R 476 / Kacem v Bashir [2010] NZSC 112, [2011] 2 NZLR 1 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3 / HELD / vulnerable client / did not provide competent advice / although client has obtained civil remedy, unsatisfactory conduct findings warranted / Committee’s decision reversed / section 211(1)(a)