LCRO quashed Standards Committee order to reducing Practitioner's fee when there was no disciplinary finding by Standards Committee that Practitioner had breached Rule 9 (excessive charging), nor evidence of overcharging.
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
Helpful search tips:
1370 items matching your search terms
LCRO quashed Standards Committee order to reducing Practitioner's fee when there was no disciplinary finding by Standards Committee that Practitioner had breached Rule 9 (excessive charging), nor evidence of overcharging.
Review applications limited to determinations pursuant to section 152 / requirements pursuant to sections 141 and 147 / orders pursuant to section 156 and directions given pursuant to sections 142 and 143.
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Paragraph 12 Trust Account Regulations / payment to third parties / Lawyer requiring photo ID of intended payee.
The decision of the Auckland Standards Committee 1 is quashed / Pursuant to section 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006.
Client complained about fees and conduct issues / Standards Committee addressed fees only and determined to take no further action on complaints.
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Standards Committee considered 5 bills of cost - note that 4 were over 2 years old / the complaint was dismissed under Regulation 29 of the (Lawyers: Complaints Service and Standards Committees) Regulations 2008.
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed.
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed.
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Complaint about the lawyer's legal advice to the Applicant / Application not upheld. LCRO confirmed Standards Committee decision.
The LCRO upheld the Standards Committee decision / Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
LCRO confirmed decision of a SC declining to uphold a complaint / Complaints included delay, overcharging and causing a loss to the estate.
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
No jurisdiction / review application filed out of time / Pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006
No jurisdiction / review application filed out of time / Pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006
Pursuant to Section 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, the decision of the Standards Committee is reversed