You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.

Helpful search tips:

  • If you are looking for a specific decision with a forward slash in the title (eg, 123/2014), you will need to replace the forward slash with a space (eg, 123 2014), as the website cannot pick up on forward slashes (/) or any other characters.
  • If you are doing a keyword search (eg. misconduct), please note that this search will only produce decisions where the keyword appears in the title or decision description. If you want to search the entire decision document for certain keywords, you will need to use full website search located in the top right hand corner of this page.
  • If you want to search for a decision from a particular jurisdiction using the full website search, put both the jurisdiction name and the keyword in the search field (eg, LCRO misconduct).
Search results

1370 items matching your search terms

  2. LCRO 58/2018 QD v FZ (12 October 2018) [PDF, 133 KB]

    Review / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / lawyer acted for legally aided client / client terminated retainer / lawyer did not appear in court / Court required lawyer to seek leave to withdraw as counsel and an explanation their non-attendance / lawyer wrote a memorandum to the court highly critical of client / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 10 / rule 13 / rule 13.8 / proper standards of professionalism / lawyer’s duty not to attack reputation / HELD / lawyer must inform the Court if the retainer is terminated / content of memorandum was not professional / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  3. LCRO 42/2018 MF v Standards Committee (10 October 2018) [PDF, 262 KB]

    Review / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / purchase of a property / clients used KiwiSaver funds / funds paid to clients / breach of undertaking given to bank / KiwiSaver Act 2006, schedule 1, rule 8 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 10.3 / W v Auckland Standards Committee 3 of the New Zealand Law Society [2012] NZCA 401, [2012] NZAR 1071 / HELD / undertakings should be adhered to / funds should have been returned to the bank / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  4. LCRO 66/2015 OB v FL (2 October 2018) [PDF, 191 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaints / administration of estate / dispute between executors / joint instructions / lawyer acted for the estate / complaint lawyer acted when there was a conflict of interest between executors / failed to provide a letter of engagement / fee complaint / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3.4 / rule 6.1 / rule 9.1 / HELD / lawyer only acted on joint instructions  / lawyer’s duties were to the estate / lawyer voluntarily reduced fees / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  5. LCRO 202/2015 BT v DG (1 October 2018) [PDF, 234 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaints / the client asked the lawyer for a legal opinion / complaint lawyer failed to follow instructions / lawyer did not have an instructing solicitor / whether Committee failed to investigate complaints / HELD / disagreement with a legal opinion not a ground for complaint / Committee investigated complaints / no conduct issues arise / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  6. LCRO 238/2015 NS v LO (28 September 2018) [PDF, 152 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaints / dissolution of business partnership / lawyer had acted for both partners / complaint of conflict of interest / use of confidential information / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 6.1 / rule 8.1 / HELD / lawyer was not acting for applicant / applicant legally represented / disclosures made were not confidential information / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  8. LCRO 151/2016 and 157/2016 NS v TD and TD v NS (27 September 2018) [PDF, 325 KB]

    Review / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct against NS and TD / NS and TD both lawyers / Family Court proceedings / NS had a conflict of interest when acting for multiple parties in the dispute / continued to act when evidence from former client was at issue in the proceedings / TD wrongfully disclosed information when making a complaint against NS / Evidence Act 2006, section 53 / section 57 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 2.8 / rule 2.9 / rule 6  / rule 6.1 / rule 6.1.1 / Sandy v Khan LCRO 181/2009 (9 December 2009) / use of privileged information / whether disclosure permitted / lawyers duty to report misconduct / HELD / conflict of interest as NS would unable to discharge all duties to clients / NS unable to challenge evidence without breaching duty of confidence to former client / TD able to fulfil duty to report misconduct without use of privileged material / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  9. LCRO 173/2014 G NP and H NP v DC (27 September 2018) [PDF, 289 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaints / Family Court proceedings / complaint lawyer increased costs to applicants / acted incompetently / misled the Court / acted unprofessionally / sent an intimidating email to the applicants / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 2.2 / rule 6 / rule 10.2 / rule 13 / whether complaints put to lawyer / duty to third parties / respect and courtesy  / judicial criticism of lawyer / HELD / Committee put complaints to lawyer / lawyer failed follow timetabling instructions / lawyer made an unfounded attack on applicants / lawyer should not have directly contacted applicants / conduct unsatisfactory / Committee’s decision otherwise confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  10. LCRO 60/2016 MO v Standards Committee (27 September 2018) [PDF, 174 KB]

    Review / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / own motion investigation / renewals of mortgages without providing a property valuation / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Nominee Company) Rules 2008, rule 13 / schedule 4, paragraph 8 / Auckland Standards Committee 2 v Burcher [2015] NZLCDT 47 / AP v ZG LCRO 278/2012 (14 March 2012) / BD v GA 186/2013 (5 May 2014) / whether a valuation was required upon renewal of the loan / HELD / renewal of a loan is the same as an investment / not all partners played a significant role in the nominee company / censure reversed / Committee’s decision otherwise confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  11. LCRO 59/2016 and 61/2016 DE and QV v Standards Committee (27 September 2018) [PDF, 175 KB]

    Review / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / own motion investigation / renewals of mortgages without providing a property valuation / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Nominee Company) Rules 2008, rule 13 / schedule 4, paragraph 8 / Auckland Standards Committee 2 v Burcher [2015] NZLCDT 47 / AP v ZG LCRO 278/2012 (14 March 2012) / BD v GA 186/2013 (5 May 2014) / whether a valuation was required upon renewal of the loan / HELD / Committee directed to address reasons why it did not proceed against all partners in the firm / renewal of a loan is the same as an investment / not all partners played a significant role in the nominee company / censure of second applicant reversed / Committee’s decision otherwise confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  13. LCRO 05/2018 ZZ v XX and WW Lawyers (26 September 2018) [PDF, 232 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaints / purchase of a business / complaint lawyer deducted fees from funds held by the lawyer / breach of confidentiality / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 9 / rule 10.3 / whether lawyer should have provided a new letter of engagement / use of a statutory demand / HELD / lawyer had an undertaking to disclose information /  / Committee directed to reconsider if fees fair and reasonable / Committee’s decision otherwise confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  14. LCRO 239/2016 RY v P AN and T AN (25 September 2018) [PDF, 314 KB]

    Review / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / agreement to purchase property and for construction of a house / deposit held by stakeholder / deposit paid to builder / lawyer failed to recognise the nature of the undertaking given by the builder’s lawyer and seek clarification / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3 / rule 3.2 / rule 7 / rule 7.1 / rule 7.2 / rule 10.3.2 / KD v WW LCRO 83/2011 (30 March 2011) / duty to advise clients and ensure they understand retainer / HELD / lawyer failed to respond to clients’ request for advice / builders lawyer did not give an undertaking / issues of contractual interpretation are matters for the court to consider / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  15. LCRO 250+251/2016 MJY and VYW v WLB, WLB v MJY and VYW (21 September 2018) [PDF, 281 KB]

    Review / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / lawyers were trustees of a family trust / fees not fair and reasonable / invoices not rendered in a reasonable time / lawyer had not issued a letter of engagement / failed to advise executors of their power to appoint trustees / did not allow uplifting of files / used legal processes for improper purposes / breach of Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 2.3 / rule 3 / rule 3.2 / rule 5 / rule 5.1 / rule 5.2 / rule 5.4 / rule 6 / rule 9 / rule 9.6 / instructing solicitor ordered to pay barrister / HELD / documents held for legitimate purpose / no obligation to forward documents / reduction of fees modified / breaches of rules 9 and 9.6  confirmed / other rule breaches reversed / Committee’s decision otherwise confirmed / section 211(1)(a). See also decision addendum/correction dated 12 November 2018.
  16. LCRO 251+250/2016 MJY and VYW v WLB, WLB v MJY and VYW (21 September 2018) [PDF, 281 KB]

    Review / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / lawyers were trustees of a family trust / fees not fair and reasonable / invoices not rendered in a reasonable time / lawyer had not issued a letter of engagement / failed to advise executors of their power to appoint trustees / did not allow uplifting of files / used legal processes for improper purposes / breach of Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 2.3 / rule 3 / rule 3.2 / rule 5 / rule 5.1 / rule 5.2 / rule 5.4 / rule 6 / rule 9 / rule 9.6 / instructing solicitor ordered to pay barrister / HELD / documents held for legitimate purpose / no obligation to forward documents / reduction of fees modified / breaches of rules 9 and 9.6  confirmed / other rule breaches reversed / Committee’s decision otherwise confirmed / section 211(1)(a). See also decision addendum/correction dated 12 November 2018.
  17. LCRO 283/2014 AD v FR and OR (31 August 2018) [PDF, 219 KB]

    Review / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / dispute with real estate agents / lawyer threatened to make complaint about agents / threatening to use legal processes for improper purpose / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 2.3 / rule 2.7 / rule 2.10 / SC v JT LCRO 382/2013 (30 June 2017) / whether demand for compensation improper / HELD / purpose of disciplinary regimes consumer protection / use of threat of disciplinary action improper / fine excessive and reduced on review / Committee’s decision otherwise confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  18. LCRO 272/2015 PA v NT, RO and DS (31 August 2018) [PDF, 214 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / estate dispute / lawyers were executors and trustees of estate / complaint about sale of property to beneficiary of estate / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 7 / rule 7.1 / Hansen v Young [2004] 1 NZLR 37 (CA) / Morpeth v Ramsey LCRO 110/2009 (12 November 2009) / whether lawyers providing regulated services / HELD / partners in firm cannot be subject of complaint if they have not been involved / actions taken as trustee not reviewable by Office / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  19. LCRO 144/2016 QT v UF (24 August 2018) [PDF, 245 KB]

    Review / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / conflict of interests / failure to provide competent advice / lawyer acted as lender and borrower in a loan agreement / review of penalty decision / Saxmere Co Ltd v New Zealand Wool Board Disestablishment Co Ltd [2009] NZSC 35, [2010] 1 NZLR 35 / AF v X LCRO 84/2014 (8 October 2014) / bias of Committee member / previous disciplinary history / HELD / no evidence of bias in Committee’s decision / no disciplinary history at the time conduct occurred / fine reduced / Committee’s decision modified / section 211(1)(a)
  21. LCRO 71/2016 ZB v YA (23 August 2018) [PDF, 230 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / lawyer was director of a company which rented property from complainant / complaint lawyer mislead complainant / Committee held it lacked jurisdiction as it was a dispute between landlord and tenant / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 12 / respect and courtesy / HELD / lawyer not acting in a professional capacity / no evidence of misconduct or unsatisfactory conduct / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  22. LCRO 7/2016 Mr and Mrs YJ v XW (22 August 2018) [PDF, 166 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaints / property purchase / lawyer acted for vendor and purchaser / complaint lawyer failed to explain fees / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3.4 / Wilson v Legal Complaints Review Officer [2016] NZHC 2288 / provision of information to client / conduct rules not to be enforced in an overly technical manner / HELD / fees fair and reasonable / breach of rule 3.4 excusable rather than unsatisfactory conduct / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  24. LCRO 124/2016 LE v AP and MC (20 August 2018) [PDF, 191 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaints / fees complaint / complaint lawyers misfiled appeal / failed to keep client informed / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, section 161 / section 210 / recovery of fees by lawyer / HELD / no evidence that lawyers had failed to communicate / no issues raised by lawyer filing appeal early / fee complaint has previously been considered by another Committee / lawyers able to seek recovery of fees / costs ordered against applicant / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)