You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
Helpful search tips:
1370 items matching your search terms
Complaint / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / fee dispute / decision sent to another partner of firm / applicants disputed personal responsibility / HELD / applicants had duties as partners in firm / lawyers have personal responsibility towards obligations / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaints / complaint over handling of estate / HELD / no merit to complaints / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaints / fee complaint / complaint that respondent did not follow instructions / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 rule 9.1 / HELD / fees fair and reasonable / respondent acting under instruction / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
Dated 01 November 2017
Complaint / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / relationship property division / respondent acted for both parties prior / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care Rules) 2008 rule 6.1 / conflict of interest / applicant unaware of undertaking / HELD / not acting for applicant / no conflict of interest / Committee’s decision reversed / section 211(1)(a)
Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / HELD / complaint raises no conduct issues / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / complaint over respondents conduct as trustee / fees charged as trustee / HELD / respondent not providing regulated services / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaints / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care Rules) 2008 rule 2 / rule 2.1 / rule 2.2 / rule 2.3 / respondent acted for applicants neighbours / letter sent to applicants / applicants considered letter a threat / applicant sought disclosure from respondent / HELD / no improper threat / respondent acting under instruction / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
Complaint / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / applicants sought immigration assistance / visa application not filed / applicants sought misconduct finding, damages / section 156 Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 / HELD / applicants vulnerable / anxiety and distress compensation / letter not improper threat / Committee’s decision modified and confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
Complaint / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / complaint arose from administration of estates / complaint over costs / section 110 Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 / conflict of interest / HELD / no breach of s 110 / fees inadequately reported / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / fees / costs assessor not appointed / HELD / Committee’s directed to reconsider complaint / section 209
Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / property transfer / delay in transfer / acting without instruction Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care Rules) 2008 rule 6.1 / rule 7 / rule 7.1 / failure to act / conflict of interest / existence of retainer / HELD / instructions not carried out / conflict of interest / Committee’s decision reversed / section 211(1)(a)
Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / alleged copyright infringement / threat made by respondent / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care Rules) 2008 rule 2.7 / improper purpose / HELD / threat made for improper purpose / respondent had apologised / fine / Committee’s decision reversed / section 211(1)(a)
Own motion enquiry / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / relationship property division / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care Rules) 2008 rule 10.3 / breach of undertaking / failure to respond to correspondence / HELD / undertaking breached / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / fee complaint / acting without instruction / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Complaints Service and Standards Committees) Regulations 2008 reg 29 / HELD / fees reasonable / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / purchase of business / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care Rules) 2008 rule 3 / competence of respondent / supervision of legal executive / HELD / applicant attended to matters without advice / respondents involvement minimal / supervision appropriate / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaints / complaint arose from leaky building litigation / whether applicants’ client consented to join litigation / whether solicitor-client relationship existed / HELD / reasonable for respondent to proceed on basis of authority / no separate duty or conflict of interest / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / respondent’s client lawyer / respondent’s client had name suppression / applicant made a complaint about respondent’s client / respondent claims applicant breach suppression and was in contempt / applicant complains about respondent’s actions / HELD / respondent’s claim was arguable / complaint lacked merit / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
Date of Decision: 28 September 2017
Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care Rules) 2008 rule 13.8 / rule 13.8.1 / respondent made critical comments made during trial about applicant / no evidence to support comments / HELD / context of closing submissions / comments not attack / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
Complaint / NZ Society of Conveyancers Committee declined to take further action on complaint / complaint over comments made by respondent / comments were serious allegations / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Conveyancing Practitioners: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 rule 6 / rule 29 / Evidence Act 2006 section 54(1) / third party respect / privileged communication / HELD / comments not unsatisfactory conduct / conveyancer/client communications not privileged / section 211(1)(a)
Complaint / NZ Society of Conveyancers Committee declined to take further action on complaint / complaint over comments made by respondent / comments were serious allegations / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Conveyancing Practitioners: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 rule 6 / rule 29 / Evidence Act 2006 section 54(1) / third party respect / privileged communication / HELD / comments not unsatisfactory conduct / Conveyancer/client communications not privileged / section 211(1)(a
Complaint / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / applicant had previously acted for respondent / applicant had not checked for conflict of interest / Morpeth v Ramsey LCRO 110/2009 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 rule 6.1 / conflict of interest / ongoing duty of loyalty / HELD / unsatisfactory conduct not supported / no basis to make orders sought / Committee’s decision reversed / section 211(1)(a)
Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / applicant wants respondent to carry out instructions / respondent requires security for fees / HELD / respondent not instructed / applicant able to seek another lawyer / no power to force respondent to act / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / respondent acted in family court proceedings / complaint that matter not straightforward / failure to advise / HELD / complaints unsupported by evidence / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)