The application for review is out of time and there is no jurisdiction to consider it.
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
Helpful search tips:
1370 items matching your search terms
The application for review is out of time and there is no jurisdiction to consider it.
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is Modified
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Rules 9.1, 9.6 and 3.4 / Practitioner sought review of Standards Committee finding that his conduct / overcharging / was unsatisfactory, following recommendation of Costs Assessor.
LCRO confirmed Standards Committee decision to prosecute / Bias allegations dismissed, costs against Applicant.
Pursuant to Section 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, the decision of the Standards Committee is reversed
Penalty Decision / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008
Reversing a Standards Committee decision / LCRO found legal executive guilty of unsatisfactory conduct for failing to properly discharge duties in relation to administration of estate.
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Pursuant to section 211 (1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Pursuant to Section 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, the decision of the Standards Committee is reversed
Pursuant to Section 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, the decision of the Standards Committee is reversed
Standards Committee unsatisfactory conduct finding was upheld on review for different reasons / Lawyer's advice on a relationship property agreement fell short of the standard in section 12(a).
Pursuant to Section 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, the decision of the Standards Committee is reversed
LCRO upholds Standards Committee decision / Pursuant to section 211 (1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006
Pursuant to Section 211 (1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed saved as is modified
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
LCRO confirmed Standards Committee decision to prosecute / Bias allegations dismissed, costs against Applicant.
Pursuant to Section 211 (1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed saved as is modified.
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
LCRO upheld Standards Committee decision / Pursuant to section 211 (1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006
File referred to Standards Committee member for report to Committee / Committee member treated as if referral for costs assessor's report and proceeded to call for files and hold meetings with parties.
Pursuant to s209(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, direct the Standards Committee to reconsider the specific matter of whether the fee of Mr BF was reasonable putting aside the records of Mr BF in respect of the time he claims was spent on the matter.