You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.

Helpful search tips:

  • If you are looking for a specific decision with a forward slash in the title (eg, 123/2014), you will need to replace the forward slash with a space (eg, 123 2014), as the website cannot pick up on forward slashes (/) or any other characters.
  • If you are doing a keyword search (eg. misconduct), please note that this search will only produce decisions where the keyword appears in the title or decision description. If you want to search the entire decision document for certain keywords, you will need to use full website search located in the top right hand corner of this page.
  • If you want to search for a decision from a particular jurisdiction using the full website search, put both the jurisdiction name and the keyword in the search field (eg, LCRO misconduct).
Search results

1334 items matching your search terms

  4. CC v BB LCRO 151/2012 (11 December 2015) [PDF, 155 KB]

    SC decision no further action – BB acted for CC in the sale of her property – because no CCC was issued for an accessory building, settlement was delayed and CC was obliged to accept a $100,000 reduction of price – complaint BB failed to carry out instructions and protect interests – review poor legal representation – LCRO referred to Q v LCRO – no discretion to introduce a party to a complaint at the review stage and continue with review – focus of complaint against law firm must be quite different from focus of complaint against BB – LCS did not have jurisdiction – BB was a conveyancing practitioner at the time – “practitioner” defined in s 2 and “appropriate complaints service” identified in s 135 – complaint about BB should have been referred to Conveyancers Complaints Service – SC decision reversed – matter returned to SC as complaint against BB’s firm