If you want to search for a decision from a particular jurisdiction using the full website search, put both the jurisdiction name and the keyword in the search field (eg, Real Estate Agents Disciplinary Tribunal).
722 items matching your search terms
Application for review of decision of the Registrar of the Real Estate Agents Authority under section 112 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008. Application dismissed.
Appeal against a decision of Complaints Assessment Committee CAC 1905. Application to adduce further evidence on appeal. Application declined.
Unsatisfactory conduct under s 72 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008. Agent censured, ordered to make an apology, and ordered to pay a fine of $5,000 to the Authority.
Application to adduce further evidence on appeal. Application declined.
Application to recall an appeal under s 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 decision. Application declined.
An appeal under section 11 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008. Appeal allowed. Order for the Committee to consider the matter afresh. Held that the Committee erred in its decision. It wrongly exercised its discretion both in the areas of deciding whether there was a prima facie case and on the question of whether it would be in the public interest to prosecute.
An appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008. Appeal dismissed.
An appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008. Committee did not err in imposing a fine of $5,000. However, the information now before the Tribunal is that the Agency has no ability to pay a fine, as it has no assets. The order that the Agency must pay a fine of $5,000 is quashed. In place of that order, we order that the Agency is censured.
An appeal under s 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008. Leave given.
Appeal against Committee's decision, under section 111 of the Real Estates Agents Act 2008. Appeal against finding of unsatisfactory conduct by salespeople. Appeal dismissed.
An appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008 against a decision of Complaints Assessment Committee 1903. Appeal dismissed - Committee was not wrong to decide to take no further no further action on the appellants' complaint.
Charges under s 91 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008. Charged with misconduct under s 73(a) of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008, with an alternative charge of misconduct under s 73(c)(iii) of the Act (for a wilful or reckless contravention of r 6.3 of the Real Estate Agents Act (Professional Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2012. Tribunal will not direct that Mr Bright is not permitted to cross-examine the complainant.
A charge laid under s 91 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008. Defendant censured and ordered to pay a fine of $5,500. The fine is to be paid to the Authority within 20 working days of the date of this decision.
An appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008. Appeal dismissed.
An appeal under section 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008. Appeal dismissed.
An appeal under s 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008. Leave to cross-examine granted.
Appeals against Committee’s decision, under s 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008. Appeal against finding of unsatisfactory conduct by agent. Appeal against finding agency did not properly supervise and manage conduct of agent. Appeal against conduct dismissed. Appeal against supervision finding allowed.
An application for review of the Registrar’s decision, under Section 112 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008. Application granted.
Appeal against Committee’s decision, under s 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008. Appeal against finding of unsatisfactory conduct. Appeal allowed.
Appeal against Committee’s decision, under s 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008. Appeal against finding of unsatisfactory conduct. Appeal allowed.
Appeal against Committee’s decision, under s 111 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008. Appeal against finding of unsatisfactory conduct. Appeal against penalty. Substantive appeal dismissed. Appeal against penalty allowed.
Tribunal decision [2020] NZREADT 18 recalled following clarification request regarding split of compensation to complainants. Payment ordered to be made to each complainant in equal shares.
Charges laid under s 91 of the Act. Defendant found guilty of serious misconduct under s 73(c)(iii) of the Act. Order that defendant be censured and fined $2,000, and ordered to pay costs of $1,500.
Charges laid under s 91 of the Act. Defendant found guilty of misconduct on charge 1 and guilty of unsatisfactory conduct on charge 2. Defendant censured, fined $4,000 and licence suspended for 6 months. Defendant also ordered to provide a written apology to the complainants as well as $5,000 to each of the complainants. Defendant ordered to undertake further education.Decision issued on 20 April 2020 then recalled and reissued on 16 June 2020. See ruling [2020] NZREADT 25.
Charge laid under section 91 of the Act. Defendant breached r 8.3 of the Rules and s 50 of the Act.