• If you are looking for a specific decision with a forward slash in the title (eg, 123/2014), you will need to replace the forward slash with a space (eg, 123 2014), as the website cannot pick up on forward slashes (/) or any other characters.
  • If you are doing a keyword search (eg, conduct), please note that this search will only produce decisions where the keyword appears in the title or decision description. If you want to search the entire decision document for certain keywords, you will need to use full website search located in the top right hand corner of this page.

If you want to search for a decision from a particular jurisdiction using the full website search, put both the jurisdiction name and the keyword in the search field (eg, Real Estate Agents Disciplinary Tribunal).

Search results

722 items matching your search terms

  1. [2020] NZREADT 36 - Complaints Assessment Committee 1904 v Bright (24 August 2020) [PDF, 217 KB]

    Charges under s 91 of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008. Charged with misconduct under s 73(a) of the Real Estate Agents Act 2008, with an alternative charge of misconduct under s 73(c)(iii) of the Act (for a wilful or reckless contravention of r 6.3 of the Real Estate Agents Act (Professional Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2012. Tribunal will not direct that Mr Bright is not permitted to cross-examine the complainant.

  2. [2020] NZREADT 18 - Hilliam [PDF, 177 KB]

    Charges laid under s 91 of the Act. Defendant found guilty of misconduct on charge 1 and guilty of unsatisfactory conduct on charge 2. Defendant censured, fined $4,000 and licence suspended for 6 months. Defendant also ordered to provide a written apology to the complainants as well as $5,000 to each of the complainants. Defendant ordered to undertake further education.Decision issued on 20 April 2020 then recalled and reissued on 16 June 2020. See ruling [2020] NZREADT 25.