You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
Helpful search tips:
738 items matching your search terms
Decision (26 June 2017)
Decision dated 22/06/17
Review conducted by duly appointed delegate. Applicant demanded hearing in person. While an applicant may decline to consent to the review being completed on the papers (s206(2) LCA) the LCRO (and delegates) may direct that the hearing take place by telephone. S 206(5) provides that the LCRO may regulate his or her procedure as he or she thinks fit and the dictates of natural justice do not require hearings to be in person.The LCRO noted that many court and quasi judicial hearings are conducted by telephone and the LCRO office must ensure resources are used effectively. Applicant also demanded that he be able to have witnesses give evidence at the review hearing. LCRO reviews will generally not accept information that was not before the Standards Committee (Guideline 17 for parties to review). Review hearings are not the same as court hearings where witnesses are called and cross examined. It is rare for a witness to be allowed to attend and give evidence at a review hearing. The evid...
Decision (12 June 2017) PLUS a supplementary order dated 29 June 2017
Decision (7 June 2017)
Decision dated 02/06/17
Decision (29 May 2017)
Decision (23 May 2017)
Decision (23 May 2017)
Decision (19 May 2017)
Decision (18 May 2017)
Decision (15 May 2017)
Decision (15 May 2017)
Date of Decision: 12 May 2017
Decision (12 May 2017)
Decision (10 May 2017)
Decision (10 May 2017)
Decision (8 May 2017)
Decision dated 28/04/17
Decision (27 April 2017)
Decision (21 April 2017)
Decision dated (6 April 2017)
Decision Dated (23 March 2017)
Decision (14 March 2017)
Decision 27 February 2017