You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.

Helpful search tips:

  • If you are looking for a specific decision with a forward slash in the title (eg, 123/2014), you will need to replace the forward slash with a space (eg, 123 2014), as the website cannot pick up on forward slashes (/) or any other characters.
  • If you are doing a keyword search (eg. misconduct), please note that this search will only produce decisions where the keyword appears in the title or decision description. If you want to search the entire decision document for certain keywords, you will need to use full website search located in the top right hand corner of this page.
  • If you want to search for a decision from a particular jurisdiction using the full website search, put both the jurisdiction name and the keyword in the search field (eg, LCRO misconduct).
Search results

1392 items matching your search terms

  1. LCRO 179/2019 HL v [Area] Standards Committee (30 April 2020) [PDF, 181 KB]

    Review / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / Family Court proceedings / judge referred Minute addressing lawyer’s behaviour to NZLS as complaint / own-motion inquiry / complaint lawyer acted as a witness and incorporated opinion (views on the evidence) in a memorandum / Evidence Act 2006, section 129 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 13.5 / rule 13.5.4 / H v S (Counsel: Debarment) [2016] NZHC 409 / HELD / lawyer annexed scientific papers to client’s affidavit about their methamphetamine use / rule 13.5 breached / lawyer familiar with scientific matters / client’s affidavit recites lawyer’s scientific qualifications and contained evidence by proxy from the lawyer / absolute requirement for lawyer to maintain their independence when conducting litigation before court / total prohibition on lawyers presenting evidence to the court / insufficient time and client funds to obtain expert evidence as to scientific evidence on methamphetamin…
  2. LCRO 118/2018 VT v MQ (18 March 2020) [PDF, 157 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / Resource Management Act 2001 prosecution / complaint lawyer charged fees without written authority and inappropriately claimed a lien over files / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3 / rule 4.4.1 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Trust Account) Regulations 2008, regulation 9 / regulation 10 / HELD / lawyer advised client the fee limit was unworkable / could require daily confirmation / client did not hold lawyer to fee limit / trust account debited in compliance with regulation 9(1)(a) / lien appropriate / no evidence of professional conduct issue / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  3. LCRO 101/2019 YK v RN (17 March 2020) [PDF, 146 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / property settlement matter / complaint lawyer provided incompetent advice, and did not follow up with vendor’s lawyer to confirm whether an extension had been granted / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3 / HELD / whether lawyer responsible for ascertaining if an extension of time has been agreed to must be considered on its particular facts / client was aware of time available for extension to be granted / no evidence client would confirm contract if extension not granted / no evidence lawyer provided incompetent advice / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  4. LCRO 146/2019 AC v CJ (12 March 2020) [PDF, 146 KB]

    Review / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / estate administration / complaint lawyer did not provide copies of invoices to complainant (residuary beneficiary) before debiting fees from estate funds held in trust account / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Trust Account) Regulations 2008, regulation 9 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, section 160 / Raunch v Maguire [2010] 2 NZLR 854 (HC) / IV v DD LCRO 272/2012 / Commissioner of Stamp Duties (Queensland) v Livingston [1965] AC 694 (PC) / HELD / residuary beneficiary in an estate has no legal or equitable interest in the assets of the estate until the residue crystallises / lawyer not required to provide residuary beneficiaries with copies of invoices before debiting those fees from estate funds in trust account / Committee’s decision reversed / section 211(1)(a)
  5. LCRO 32/2020 R NB and A NB v TD (11 March 2020) [PDF, 130 KB]

    Jurisdiction / whether application for review made out of time / application delayed by courier / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, section 198 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Amendment Act 2012 / Interpretation Act 1999, section 29 / Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017, section 211 / KX v WA LCRO 84/2012 (30 April 2012) / UQ v OI LCRO 19/2013 (2 April 2013) / HELD / application filed out of time / review officer has no discretion to extend timeframe / proof of service / no legislation that precludes email as a method of filing or service / five working day presumption in section 198 is rebuttable / no jurisdiction
  6. LCRO 123/2019 & 124/2019 MC v QK and QK v MC (3 March 2020) [PDF, 199 KB]

    Complaint / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / conveyancing transaction / complaint lawyer acted for a client and grandson in a conflict of interest situation / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 1.2 / rule 6 / rule 6.1 / rule 6.1.1 / rule 6.1.2 / Sandy v Kahn LCRO 181/2009 / ZAA v YBC LCRO 243/2013 / Taylor v Schofield Peterson [1999] 3 NZLR 434 / HELD / distinction between contentious and non-contentious matters / more than negligible risk that lawyer would be unable to discharge obligations owed to one or more clients / transfer of property to family trust / client’s consent insufficient to manage conflict issue / disciplinary process not a substitute for civil proceedings / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  7. LCRO 104/2018 CJ v MV (28 February 2020) [PDF, 189 KB]

    Review / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / notice of claim and caveat in relationship property matter / complaint lawyer did not take reasonable care in respect of notice of claim / fee complaint / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3 / rule 9 / rule 9.1 / HELD / lawyer did not obtain post-registration search to confirm registration of notice of claim / admitted breach of rule 3 / fees fair and reasonable / Committee’s decision reversed / unsatisfactory conduct pursuant to section 12(c) for breach of rule 3 / $500 fine ordered / section 211(1)
  9. LCRO 68/2019 NI v RC and OD (28 February 2020) [PDF, 175 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / employment relations matter / complaint lawyer failed to act competently, respond to inquiries, keep client informed about progress on case or treat them with respect and courtesy / fee complaint / client felt pressured to sign settlement agreement / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 9 / HELD / no evidence of breach of professional standards regarding complaint / opposing party issued deadline for settlement agreement / invoice narration suggests two invoices may be issued for same work / during application for review, lawyer failed to provide evidence supporting invoices requested under s 207 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)
  12. LCRO 12/2018 NH and EW v TL and [KT Law] (17 February 2020) [PDF, 102 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / estate administration / complaint lawyers allowed executors to breach High Court freezing orders / applicants are not lawyers’ clients / duties to non-clients / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 12 / HELD / lawyers not responsible for breach of freezing orders / lawyers owe limited obligations to non-clients / no evidence of discourtesy or lack of authority to make payments / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)
  14. LCRO 130/2018 UH v OB (12 February 2020) [PDF, 165 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal proceedings / complaint lawyer provided negligent advice and representation / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3 / HELD / no evidence of breach of professional standards / allegations against a lawyer must be supported by evidence / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)
  15. LCRO 38/2019 & 151/2019 Yuri Lukas v ZE (30 January 2020) [PDF, 167 KB]

    Complaint / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / immigration application / complaint lawyer did not act in a timely manner, charged fees that were more than fair and reasonable, and that their practice did not preserve the reputation of the legal profession / fee complaint / client overpaid invoice / Committee ordered publication of name / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3 / rule 9 / HELD / instructing solicitor does not appear to have been involved in relationship between client and lawyer / Standards Committee directed to investigate instructing solicitor and overpayment of invoice issue / section 209(1) / lawyer achieved nothing of value for client / publication order confirmed / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a).  (See also minute dated 30 October 2019)
  16. LCRO 116/2019 RLF v DN (29 January 2020) [PDF, 211 KB]

    Complaint / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / estate administration / complaint lawyer did not provide explanations for actions during estate administration / duties during estate administration / Davis v Mancer [2015] NZHC 3005 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 1.2 / rule 6 / rule 6.1 / rule 7.1 / Administration Act 1969 / Protection of Personal and Property Rights Act 1988 / Senior Courts (Access to Court Documents) Rules 2017 / HELD / estate’s lawyer’s client is the executor, not the beneficiaries / does not owe beneficiaries professional duties owed to clients / no evidence of professional standards issue / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  17. LCRO 24/2017 HC v DASH (24 January 2020) [PDF, 216 KB]

    Complaint / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / property transaction and land registration / complaint lawyer incorrectly registered property in the name of trustees rather than the client, acted for more than one client, and failed to terminate retainers / Sandy v Kahn LCRO 181/2009 (9 December 2009) / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 1.2 / rule 3 / rule 6 / rule 6.1 / rule 6.1.2 / HELD / insufficient evidence to determine what instructions were given regarding registration of property / more than negligible risk of conflict / parties required independent advice / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  18. LCRO 145/2019 TS v NU and VL (21 January 2020) [PDF, 128 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / criminal proceedings / complaint lawyer did not take steps to recuse judge or delay trial, and ignored instructions to appeal / Saxmere Co Ltd v Wool Board Disestablishment Co Ltd [2009] NZSC 72 / Saxmere Co Ltd v Wool Board Disestablishment Co Ltd (No 2) [2009] NZSC 122 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3 / rule 13 / HELD / no evidence of professional standards issue / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  19. LCRO 62/2017 & LCRO 63/2017 HC and RE v DL (9 January 2020) [PDF, 239 KB]

    Review / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / property transaction / complaint lawyer emailed represented client and others directly, alleging their lawyer’s negligence / disputed interpretation of legislation / Unit Titles Act 2010 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 10.1 / rule 10.2 / HELD / unsatisfactory conduct found / breach of rule 10.1 / degree and extent of lawyer’s negligence allegations breach rule 10.1 / $2,000 fine and apology ordered / unable to conclude that lawyer knowingly and deliberately directly communicated with represented client; no finding lawyer breached rule 10.2 / legal executive breached personal obligation to act responsibly when sending the emails, but no penalty due to subservient position / Committee’s decision modified / section 211(1)
  20. LCRO 87/2018 QZ v FZB (20 December 2019) [PDF, 231 KB]

    Review / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / probate and estate administration / complaint lawyer twice invoiced former client and delayed providing client file to new lawyer due to lien / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 4.4.1 / HELD / one invoice validly issued after the retainer was terminated for pre-termination attendances / however, second invoice not validly issued due to termination of retainer / reliance on lien for non-payment of second invoice inappropriate / Committee’s decision modified to reflect one invoice validly issued / penalty confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  21. LCRO 1/2018 SY v LT and LN (17 December 2019) [PDF, 224 KB]

    Review / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / administration of estate / complaint lawyer retained portion of estate funds to cover potential claims and did not sufficiently progress administration / dual role when lawyer also acts as executor / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 7.1 / rule 12 / Davis v Mancer [2015] NZHC 3005 / Auckland Standards Committee v Johnston [2011] NZLCDT 14 / Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee No. 1 v Campion [2019] NZLCDT 20 / HELD / conduct not captured by rule 7.1 which is directed towards clients / lawyers owe duties under rule 12 to third parties, including beneficiaries / no progress in administering estate for several years / breach of section 12(a) / Committee’s decision modified to reduce fine from $3,000 to $1,000 / Committee’s decision otherwise confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  22. LCRO 184/2018 DP v VK (17 December 2019) [PDF, 153 KB]

    Review / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / limited partnership representing general partner / complaint lawyer represented two entities in conflict of interest / whether retainer existed / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 6.1 / Limited Partnerships Act 2008 / HELD / lawyer represented general partner company in limited partnership but there is no evidence they represented the limited partnership / the general partner sharing information with the limited partnership does not evidence a retainer between the lawyer and the limited partnership / Committee’s decision reversed / unsatisfactory conduct finding reversed / section 211(1)(a)
  23. LCRO 104/2017 CH v SL (16 December 2019) [PDF, 167 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / enduring power of attorney / complaint donor not mentally competent to execute EPOA / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3 / Den v Vancleve (1819) 2 Southard 660 / Re K (Enduring Powers of Attorney) [1988] 2 WLR 781 / Hoff v Atherton [2004] EWCA Civ 1554 / Simon v Byford [2014] EWCA Civ 280 / HELD / complaints process does not offer parallel jurisdiction for determination of professional negligence / no clear-cut evidence of professional standards issue / earlier medical report complainant relies on was not made available to lawyer / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  24. LCRO 187/2017 MO v FP (13 December 2019) [PDF, 163 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / enduring power of attorney / complaint donor not mentally competent to execute EPOA / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3 / Den v Vancleve (1819) 2 Southard 660 / Re K (Enduring Powers of Attorney) [1988] 2 WLR 781 / Hoff v Atherton [2004] EWCA Civ 1554 / Simon v Byford [2014] EWCA Civ 280 / HELD / complaints process does not offer parallel jurisdiction for determination of professional negligence / no clear-cut evidence of professional standards issue / earlier medical report complainant relies on was not made available to lawyer / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)