You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.

Helpful search tips:

  • If you are looking for a specific decision with a forward slash in the title (eg, 123/2014), you will need to replace the forward slash with a space (eg, 123 2014), as the website cannot pick up on forward slashes (/) or any other characters.
  • If you are doing a keyword search (eg. misconduct), please note that this search will only produce decisions where the keyword appears in the title or decision description. If you want to search the entire decision document for certain keywords, you will need to use full website search located in the top right hand corner of this page.
  • If you want to search for a decision from a particular jurisdiction using the full website search, put both the jurisdiction name and the keyword in the search field (eg, LCRO misconduct).
Search results

1407 items matching your search terms

  1. LCRO 1/2018 SY v LT and LN (17 December 2019) [PDF, 224 KB]

    Review / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / administration of estate / complaint lawyer retained portion of estate funds to cover potential claims and did not sufficiently progress administration / dual role when lawyer also acts as executor / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 7.1 / rule 12 / Davis v Mancer [2015] NZHC 3005 / Auckland Standards Committee v Johnston [2011] NZLCDT 14 / Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee No. 1 v Campion [2019] NZLCDT 20 / HELD / conduct not captured by rule 7.1 which is directed towards clients / lawyers owe duties under rule 12 to third parties, including beneficiaries / no progress in administering estate for several years / breach of section 12(a) / Committee’s decision modified to reduce fine from $3,000 to $1,000 / Committee’s decision otherwise confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  2. LCRO 184/2018 DP v VK (17 December 2019) [PDF, 153 KB]

    Review / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / limited partnership representing general partner / complaint lawyer represented two entities in conflict of interest / whether retainer existed / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 6.1 / Limited Partnerships Act 2008 / HELD / lawyer represented general partner company in limited partnership but there is no evidence they represented the limited partnership / the general partner sharing information with the limited partnership does not evidence a retainer between the lawyer and the limited partnership / Committee’s decision reversed / unsatisfactory conduct finding reversed / section 211(1)(a)
  3. LCRO 104/2017 CH v SL (16 December 2019) [PDF, 167 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / enduring power of attorney / complaint donor not mentally competent to execute EPOA / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3 / Den v Vancleve (1819) 2 Southard 660 / Re K (Enduring Powers of Attorney) [1988] 2 WLR 781 / Hoff v Atherton [2004] EWCA Civ 1554 / Simon v Byford [2014] EWCA Civ 280 / HELD / complaints process does not offer parallel jurisdiction for determination of professional negligence / no clear-cut evidence of professional standards issue / earlier medical report complainant relies on was not made available to lawyer / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  4. LCRO 187/2017 MO v FP (13 December 2019) [PDF, 163 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / enduring power of attorney / complaint donor not mentally competent to execute EPOA / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3 / Den v Vancleve (1819) 2 Southard 660 / Re K (Enduring Powers of Attorney) [1988] 2 WLR 781 / Hoff v Atherton [2004] EWCA Civ 1554 / Simon v Byford [2014] EWCA Civ 280 / HELD / complaints process does not offer parallel jurisdiction for determination of professional negligence / no clear-cut evidence of professional standards issue / earlier medical report complainant relies on was not made available to lawyer / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  6. LCRO 117/2017 LA v KB (11 December 2019) [PDF, 157 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / liquidation matter / complaint by unsecured creditor that lawyer’s fee and structure unfair / lawyer entered a conditional fee agreement with liquidator / Committee decided applicant not a person chargeable and declined jurisdiction to consider complaint / Lawyers and Conveyancers (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 1.2 / rule 9 / Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 / HELD / applicant not a party to fee agreement / lawyer acted for liquidator not applicant / applicant not a person chargeable with respondent’s bill of costs / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  7. LCRO 236/2017 HC and CI v PR (10 December 2019) [PDF, 100 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / purchase of land subject to easement / complaint complainants purchased land with no benefit to them / request for compensation / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, section 156(1)(d) / HELD / potential future losses not compensable / time and energy in complaints process not compensable / complainants committed to purchase before instructing lawyer / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  8. LCRO 221/2016 FN v SB (10 December 2019) [PDF, 130 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / lease renewal / complaint lawyer acted beyond instructions and did not seek payment from landlord for lawyer’s fees / Hunstanton v Camborne LCRO 167/2009 (10 February 2010) / Chean v Kensington Swan HC Auckland Civ-2006-404-1047, 7 June 2006 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 9 / rule 9.1 / HELD / no evidence of professional standards issue / focus of complaint is on landlord’s failure to cover fees / fees reasonable / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  9. LCRO 2/2017 RR and SS Trust v QQ, WW, EE, GG, TT, YY, UU, OO, PP, ZZ, FF and DD (3 December 2019) [PDF, 70 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined jurisdiction as complaint res judicata / lawyer’s nominee company’s compliance with regulations / review application on the basis Committee wrong to determine it had no jurisdiction / HELD / standing / complainant does not have sufficient personal interest to support complaint / substance of complaint has been addressed / further action on complaint not necessary or appropriate / section 211(1)(b)
  10. LCRO 74/2018 PG v EJ (29 November 2019) [PDF, 149 KB]

    Review / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / estate administration / complaint lawyer opposed beneficiary in family protection claim and did not provide information / fee complaint / lawyer sole executor and trustee of estate / Administration Act 1969, section 26 / Family Protection Act 1955, section 11 / Hunstanton v Cambourne LCRO 167/2009 (February 2010) / Re Murphy’s Settlements [1998] 3 All ER 1 / Jemma Trust Co Ltd v Liptrott [2003] EWCA Civ 1476 / HELD / although best practice, lawyer not required to provide bill of costs to complainant in these circumstances / lawyer’s involvement in family protection claim and payments to third parties from estate, in executor capacity / section 211(1)(b) / Committee directed to determine fee complaint / section 209(1)(a) / Committee’s decision otherwise confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  11. LCRO 96/2017 AA v BB (29 November 2019) [PDF, 203 KB]

    Review / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / conveyancing transaction settlement / complaint lawyer’s conduct created impression settlement could not take place / Court of Appeal determined lawyer’s conduct conveyed impression problem had not been solved / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3 / rule 10 / rule 10.1 / rule 11 / rule 11.1 / Fair Trading Act 1986 / BC v YT LCRO 215/2010 (April 2011) / RP v LP LCRO 292/2011 (October 2012) / JW v QE LCRO 192/2011 (September 2012) / R v D LCRO 56/2009 / HELD / breach of rule 10 and rule 10.1 / failed to advise problem solved / Committee’s decision modified to record breach of rule 10 and rule 10.1 and contravention of section 12(c) / Committee’s decision otherwise confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  13. LCRO 68/2018 TY v HG (29 November 2019) [PDF, 220 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / Commerce Commission investigation / complaint lawyer alleged breaches of consumer law / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 10.1 / rule 13 / rule 13.8 / rule 13.8.1 / rule 13.8.2 / Medcalf v Weatherill [2002] UKHL 27 / Schmidt v Pepper New Zealand (Custodians) Ltd [2012] NZCA 565 / submissions were requests for inquiry, not allegations of criminal offending / rule 13.8 requires allegations of reprehensible conduct to have reasonable grounds, not concrete evidence / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  16. LCRO 216/2018 AA v BB (28 November 2019) [PDF, 165 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / enforcement proceedings / complaint lawyer failed to competently represent client and terminated retainer without good cause / Auckland Standards Committee 3 v Castles [2013] NZLCDT 53 / LCRO 262/2014 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3 / rule 4.1 / rule 4.2 / rule 4.2.1 / HELD / evidence does not demonstrate inadequate representation / not task of Standards Committee or LCRO to provide overarching supervision of litigation strategies / lawyer did not have capacity to attend to charging order, which required urgent response / fully informed client and received instructions to transfer file / retainer ended by consent / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  17. LCRO 7/2018 AB v CD (26 November 2019) [PDF, 165 KB]

    Review / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / protection order / complaint lawyer did not provide adequate final account and exceeded estimate / fee complaint / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 7.2 / rule 9 / rule 9.3 / rule 9.4 / rule 9.6 / rule 9.7 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Trust Account) Regulations 2008, regulation 9 / regulation 10 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, section 110 / HELD / no evidence estimate was provided or that lawyer failed to provide invoice / final account met rule 9.7 / breach of rule 7.2 / did not provide information on request / lawyer stated they may withdraw discount offered if information request was sustained / Committee’s decision modified to record breach of r 7.2 / section 211(1)(a)
  18. LCRO 81/2018 QQ v RR (26 November 2019) [PDF, 548 KB]

    Review / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / Family Court proceedings / complaint lawyer failed to protect interests and act in accordance with fiduciary duties / fee complaint / Family Court set aside relationship property agreement / Committee ordered $150,000 fee refund / Property (Relationships) Act 1976, section 21 / P v H LCRO 02/2009 / TJ v DM LCRO 261/2016 / HELD / elements of joint complaint vexatious / evidence does not support allegations in complaint / Committee may not order refund exceeding fees paid / lawyer kept client informed and provided competent advice / no evidence of assurances that costs position was secure / retainer uncertain with litigation risk / no further action on fee complaint as joint complaint vexatious / section 211(1)(b) / Committee’s decision reversed / section 211(1)(a) 
  19. LCRO 37/2018 AH v OO (12 November 2019) [PDF, 166 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / conveyancing matter / complaint lawyer did not competently advise on due diligence / pre-1 August 2008 conduct / Law Practitioners Act 1982 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, section 351 / Woods v Legal Complaints Review Officer [2013] NZHC 674 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3 / HELD / advice on conveyancing was a breach of rule 3 / Committee’s decision modified to record unsatisfactory conduct pursuant to sections 12(a) and 12(c) / section 211(1)(a)
  23. LCRO 215/2018 WN v ZD (31 October 2019) [PDF, 162 KB]

    Review / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / litigation representation / complaint lawyer failed to keep client informed / whether lawyer has a duty to advise they will be unable to complete retainer due to resignation / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3 / rule 7.1 / HELD / lawyer failed to advise client they had resigned from firm / breach of rule 7.1 / apology / Committee’s decision modified to record unsatisfactory conduct pursuant to sections 12(a) and 12(c) / section 211(1)(a)