• If you are looking for a specific decision with a forward slash in the title (eg, 123/2014), you will need to replace the forward slash with a space (eg, 123 2014), as the website cannot pick up on forward slashes (/) or any other characters.
  • If you are doing a keyword search (eg, sanction), please note that this search will only produce decisions where the keyword appears in the title or decision description. If you want to search the entire decision document for certain keywords, you will need to use full website search located in the top right hand corner of this page.

  • If you want to search for a specific section of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 or clause of the Code of Conduct 2014, you must search it as one word with no spaces or brackets. For example, if searching for section 44(2)(a) of the Act, you should enter ‘s442a’ into the keyword search and if searching for clause 19(k) of the Code of Conduct, you should enter ‘cl19k’.

If you want to search for a decision from a particular jurisdiction using the full website search, put both the jurisdiction name and the keyword in the search field (eg, Immigration Advisors Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal sanction).

Search results

864 items matching your search terms

  1. [2026] NZIACDT 17 – GX v Huang (13 March 2026) [PDF, 243 KB]

    Professional responsibilities and professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s 442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl5, cl6, cl14, cl17b, cl18b, cl19i / HELD / adviser failed to send draft application to client before filing / breach of cl1 / failed to provide evidence of being licensed / providing licence number not sufficient / breach of cl14 / failed to explain summary of professional obligations or significant matters in agreement / breach of cl17b & cl18b / paying commission to agent without disclosing conflict in writing, recording in agreement, and obtaining written consent, breach of cl5 & cl6 & cl19i / failed to charge reasonable fee / uplift for ‘no fee, no win’ model could not justify extravagant fee of $16,000 for two work visa and one student visa applications / breach of cl20a / sanctions to follow 
  2. [2026] NZIACDT 16 - NN v Registrar of Immigration Advisers (10 March 2026) [PDF, 74 KB]

    Appeal against Registrar rejecting complaint / immigration lawyer alleged adviser used copyrighted materials from third party organisations in contractual terms and conditions and various professional practice documents published on his website / Registrar rejected complaint under s 45 as there was no evidence of potential copyright infringement / Authority did not believe it nor Tribunal were correct organisations to make determinations as to copyright infringement / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s45, s442 / potential breaches of copyrighted materials without consent do not fall within statutory definition of immigration advice / no client nor immigration matter / matters fall outside statutory complaint and disciplinary process / matters may be investigated as part of considering fitness of person for licensing albeit not be subject of complaint / immaterial that copyright holders have not complained or commenced proceedings in other fora / appeal rejected
  3. [2026] NZIACDT 15 - XI v Shi & Sun (6 March 2026) [PDF, 234 KB]

    Sanctions / adviser found liable for four breaches of professional standards, including rubber stamping and charging excessive fees / supervisor found liable for one breach for failure to exercise due care and diligence in allowing extravagant fee / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s3, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl12c, cl17b, cl17c, cl18b, cl20a / direct engagement a fundamental obligation of advisers / excessive fee was approximately twice the upper end of market rate / adviser’s gravity of wrongdoing moderate / supervisor’s gravity of wrongdoing regarding excessive fee at upper end of low / neither adviser nor supervisor acknowledged wrongdoing, nor offered apology or indicated remorse / no evidence of improved practices / adviser gave untruthful evidence at hearing / first disciplinary findings / adviser was inexperienced and provisionally licensed / adviser censured, required to undergo training, and fined $4,000 / supervisor cautioned and fined $1,500
  4. [2026] NZIACDT 14 - AM v Huang (3 March 2026) [PDF, 241 KB]

    Professional responsibilities and professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl4(a), cl5, cl6, cl17b, cl19l and cl20a / adviser failed to send draft application to client before filing with INZ / relied on recruitment company to review application with client / failed to obtain written authority from client to disclose personal information to recruiting company / assurance from third party that it has authority from client insufficient / failed to explain professional obligations and significant matters in agreement / failed to disclose conflict of interest / tripartite agreement with recruitment company created potential conflict which required disclosure and client’s written consent / adviser’s fees excessive / application was uncomplicated and did not warrant fee significantly beyond market range / ‘no win, no fee’ model lawful but did not justify steep elevation in fee / exploitive fee / complaint upheld / sanctions to follow
  5. [2026] NZIACDT 13 - INZ (Watson) v Huang (26 February 2026) [PDF, 270 KB]

    Professional responsibilities and professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl4(a), cl5, cl6, cl17b, cl18b, cl19l and cl20a / adviser failed to send draft application to client before filing with INZ / relied on recruitment company to review application with client / failed to obtain written authority from client to disclose personal information to recruiting  company / assurance from third party that it has authority from client insufficient / failed to explain professional obligations and significant matters in agreement / failed to disclose conflict of interest / tripartite agreement with recruitment company created potential conflict which required disclosure and client’s written consent / adviser’s fees excessive / applications were uncomplicated and did not warrant fee significantly beyond market range / ‘no win, no fee’ model lawful but did not justify steep elevation in fee / complaint upheld / sanctions to follow
  6. [2026] NZIACDT 12 – TS v Registrar of Immigration Advisers (23 February 2026) [PDF, 201 KB]

    Appeal against Registrar rejecting complaint / complaint adviser misled appellant by stating he was eligible for NZ job market, overestimating eligibility for resident visa / complaint adviser deceived him into believing that being “eligible” for resident visa  would enable him to secure employment / complaint adviser did not provide clear, documented advice about limits of eligibility / complaint regarding job search dismissed as undertaken by a different person in a different company under a separate contract / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s45, s442 / appellant misunderstood advice provided by adviser / adviser did not communicate he was entitled to such visa / adviser explained that further steps would “enhance” eligibility / rejection from employers due to lack of work visa is a reflection of job market / regulatory breaches discovered did not justify disciplinary action / appeal rejected
  7. [2026] NZIACDT 11 - ZQ v Zhuang (20 February 2026) [PDF, 101 KB]

    Sanctions / adviser terminated engagement after undertaking considerable work in respect of applications for complainant and her family / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl17b, cl18b, cl28c / three breaches of Code / adviser’s first appearance before Tribunal / low overall gravity of wrongdoing / adviser accepted disciplinary findings and has since introduced improvements in practice / adviser cautioned and fined $500
  8. [2026] NZIACDT 10 - ZM v Yu (18 February 2026) [PDF, 235 KB]

    Professional responsibilities and professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl3a, cl8a, cl8c, cl13a, cl13c, c14, cl18a, cl22, cl24c, cl26e, cl29a / failure to engage with Authority and Tribunal / adviser failed to provide client evidence of being licensed / failed to provide written services agreement / failed to provide invoice / failed to act under direct supervision of supervisor under conditions of provisional licence / failed to inform client of being provisionally licensed / failed to inform client when her licence was suspended and provide a refund / failed to provide Authority client file / complaint upheld / sanctions to follow.
  9. [2026] NZIACDT 09 – ID v Yu (16 February 2026) [PDF, 260 KB]

    Professional responsibilities and professional practice / dishonesty / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl8a, cl8c, cl13a, cl13c, cl14, cl15a, cl17a, cl17b, cl17c, cl18b, cl19c, cl19m, cl19n, cl26e / adviser dishonestly concealed failure to lodge residence visa application and fabricated existence of ‘missing’ interim visa / declined to engage with Authority and Tribunal / failed to carry out complainant’ instructions / failed to explain significant matters in services agreement / failed to provide and explain summary of professional obligations and complaints procedure / failed to act under direct supervision of supervisor under conditions of provisional licence / failed to inform client of being provisionally licensed and provide evidence of licence / failed to provide Authority with client file / complaint partially upheld / sanctions to follow
  10. [2026] NZIACDT 08 - EG v Yu (12 February 2026) [PDF, 251 KB]

    Professional responsibilities and professional practice / dishonesty / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl8a, cl8c, cl13a, cl14, cl17a, cl17b, cl17c, cl18b, cl22, cl26e / adviser dishonestly informed complainant a visa application had been made and was under assessment by INZ / dishonestly advised complainant that interim visa had been issued and she was not overstaying / filed s 61 request for discretionary visa without instructions / falsely informed complainant only agent could contact INZ regarding application / failed to carry out and acted contrary to complainant’s instructions / failed to explain significant matters in agreement, professional responsibilities owed and complaints procedure / failed to act under direct supervision of supervisor under conditions of provisional licence / failed to inform client of being provisionally licensed and provide evidence of licence / complaint upheld / sanctions to follow
  11. [2026] NZIACDT 07 – RZ v Yu (10 February 2026) [PDF, 270 KB]

    Professional responsibilities and professional practice / dishonesty / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl8a, cl8c, cl13a, cl13c, cl14, cl15a, cl17a, cl17b, cl17c, cl18b, cl19c, cl19m, cl19n, cl24a, cl24c, cl26b, cl26e / adviser dishonestly concealed failure to reply to INZ’s requests for information in response to work visa variation application / concealed decline of initial variation application / lodged second variation application without informing complainant, forging complainant’s signature in attempt to conceal earlier failures to respond to INZ / declined to engage with Authority and Tribunal / failed to send applications for complainant’s review prior to filing / no written service agreement / failed to act under direct supervision of supervisor under conditions of provisional licence / failed to inform client of being provisionally licensed and provide evidence of licence / complaint upheld / sanctions to follow
  12. [2026] NZIACDT 06 – SM v Yu (10 February 2026) [PDF, 262 KB]

    Professional responsibilities and professional practice / dishonesty / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2a, cl2e, cl8a, cl8c, cl13a, cl14, cl15a, cl17a, cl17b, cl17c, cl18b, cl19c, cl19m, cl19n, cl22, cl26e / adviser dishonestly advised clients that application for visas had been filed and that grant of visas was imminent / adviser filed application five days later / adviser dishonestly withheld draft application and INZ’s letters to conceal misleading conduct / failed to obtain clients’ instructions / declined to engage with Authority and Tribunal / provided no written service agreement / failed to act under direct supervision of supervisor under conditions of provisional licence / failed to inform client of being provisionally licensed and provide evidence of licence / failed to respond to INZ’s correspondence seeking information about clients / complaint upheld / sanctions to follow
  13. [2026] NZIACDT 05 - QX v Yu (03 February 2026) [PDF, 274 KB]

    Professional responsibilities and professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2a, cl2e, cl8a, cl8c, cl13a, cl14, cl18a, cl22, cl26a, cl26b, cl26d / adviser dishonestly filed application on behalf of client for tourism or holiday visa rather than work visa sought by client / subsequently provided client a fabricated work visa decline letter from INZ / failed to provide client draft visa application for review / failed to respond to INZ’s request for further information, resulting in declined application / failed to act under direct supervision of supervisor under conditions of provisional licence / failed to inform complainant of being provisionally licensed and provide evidence of licence / failed to provide services agreement / failed to obtain and carry out client’s instructions, provide timely updates, and provide invoice / failed to maintain well-managed filing system / complaint partially upheld / sanctions to follow
  14. [2026] NZIACDT 04 - ZX v Yu (03 February 2026) [PDF, 272 KB]

    Professional responsibilities and professional practice / dishonesty / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl8a, cl8c, cl13a, cl14, cl18a, cl26e / adviser dishonestly offered residency-qualifying job in exchange for substantial payment / client had already paid significant fees for visa and supposed employment agreement / discussions involved significant staged payments, inflated salary and structured costs to facilitate residence, indicating alleged job‑selling and immigration fraud / adviser knew advice to client was in contravention of immigration and employment legislation / provided no written service agreement / failed to act under direct supervision of supervisor under conditions of provisional licence / failed to inform client of being provisionally licensed and provide evidence of licence / complaint upheld / sanctions to follow
  15. [2026] NZIACDT 03 - XI v Shi & Sun (23 January 2026) [PDF, 370 KB]

    Professional responsibilities and professional practice / rubber stamping / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl12c, cl17b, cl17c, cl18b, cl20a / complaint against adviser and supervisor / complainant did not give evidence / breach of cl1 and cl2e / adviser insufficiently personally engaged with complainant nor sent draft application for review / Tribunal rejects evidence about claimed discussion as untruthful / breach of cl17b and cl18b / did not explain professional responsibilities or significant matters in agreement / breach of 20a / professional fee of ~$7,200 for accredited employer work visa application unfair and unreasonable / uplift for urgency not confirmed with client / uplift for work on holiday, high workload not justified / breach of cl1 / supervisor allowed adviser to charge extravagant fee / complaint not trivial / sanctions to follow.
  16. [2026] NZIACDT 02 - NO v Ellis (15 January 2026) [PDF, 194 KB]

    Sanctions / dviser failed to confirm in writing discussions with client relating to incomplete financial evidence / adviser unprofessionally communicated with tertiary institute following decline of student visa, taking potentially damaging gratuitous ‘swipe’ at client once engagement was terminated / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl26c / two breaches of Code / adviser’s first appearance before Tribunal / low overall gravity of wrongdoing / adviser accepted disciplinary findings and has since introduced improvements in practice to record and confirm material discussions in writing / adviser cautioned and fined $1,000
  17. [2026] NZIACDT 01 - ZQ v Zhuang (14 January 2026) [PDF, 281 KB]

    Professional responsibilities and professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl17b, cl18b, cl28c / alleged that adviser failed to properly explain financial requirements of visas / complainant provided out-of-date bank certificate for funds which no longer existed / evidence demonstrated adviser made considerable effort to explain financial criteria / no breach of cl1 / failed to verbally explain professional responsibilities / written summary insufficient / breaches of cl17b and cl18b / adviser failed to advise where to find assistance following termination / breach of cl28c / adviser engaged in additional work following provision of incorrect information by complainant / no refund warranted / no breach of cl24a and cl24c / complainant impliedly consented to third party knowing reasons for termination / no material breach in disclosure of information / no breach of cl4 / alternative negligence heads dismissed / sanctions to follow.
  18. [2025] NZIACDT 59 – Labour Inspectorate (Gardiner) v Jaspal (19 December 2025) [PDF, 202 KB]

    Sanctions / adviser failed to disclose in writing to client a potential conflict of interest given familial connection to director of sponsor employer / familial connection risked compromising adviser’s ability to provide objective immigration advice / failed to provide written services agreement / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl5, cl6, cl18a, cl20c / four breaches of professional obligations / adviser’s failure to have written agreement and to properly disclose conflict and obtain client’s consent to continued representation are not minor matters / gravity of the wrongdoing at lower end of moderate spectrum / adviser’s failure to have agreement inadvertent / first appearance in nine years of practice / adviser has made improvements to practice / adviser censured / no training order required given rehabilitative efforts / adviser fined $2,000 
  19. [2025] NZIACDT 58 - NF v Wilson (9 December 2025) [PDF, 191 KB]

    Sanctions / adviser failed to provide complainant’s police certificate to Immigration NZ in course of lodging visa application / lack of police certificate had significant impact on duration of complainant’s visa / adviser’s offer to apply for subsequent visa free of any service fee not an adequate solution, in breach of internal complaints procedure / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl24a, cl24c / three breaches of Code / first complaint against adviser / adviser declined to engage with Tribunal and expressed no remorse or apology / wrongdoing does not justify censure / adviser cautioned / low-level gravity of offending / adviser fined $1,000
  20. [2025] NZIACDT 57 – SH v McGarrigle (4 December 2025) [PDF, 233 KB]

    Sanctions / complainant engaged adviser to seek visa for adult daughter / adviser incorrectly advised complainant that the client was beyond the dependence age and could only apply for a visitor, student or work visa / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl5, cl6, cl19l, cl26f / five failures of five professional obligations / wrongdoing involved undisclosed eligibility for commission for acting as school’s agent / incorrect advice for resident visa eligibility had severe consequences for client / lack of diligence and due care / immaterial that complainant did not follow internal complaints procedure / first appearance / adviser has no insight into wrongdoing, no remorse, and offers no apology / adviser censured / no training order required as adviser relinquished licence / $1,500 financial penalty / adviser ordered to pay $9,145.25 in compensation, reflecting visa and tuition fees, and emotional harm to complainant and client 
  21. [2025] NZIACDT 56 – INZ (Watson) v Santos (2 December 2025) [PDF, 204 KB]

    Sanctions / adviser failed to directly communicate or engage with client (‘rubber stamping’), resulting in eight breaches of seven obligations in the Code / four clients involved, three primarily affected / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s3, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl17b, cl18b, cl26aiv, cl26b, cl26d / direct engagement a fundamental obligation of advisers / gravity of wrongdoing at upper end of moderate / adviser acknowledged wrongdoing but no apology offered / high workload no justification for failure to discharge professional obligations / adviser ordered to undergo training / adviser censured / ordered to pay $4,000 financial penalty
  22. [2025] NZIACDT 55 - NA v Wharekura (20 October 2025) [PDF, 125 KB]

    Sanctions / adviser failed to lodge complainant’s work visa application and carelessly represented that it had been filed / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl17a, cl17b, cl17c, cl19f, cl19g, cl19h / four heads of complaint involving breach of eight obligations in Code / adviser has acknowledged wrongdoing and made considerable efforts to improve practice / adviser’s medical circumstances provide some explanation but do not justify wrongdoing / third complaint upheld against adviser / adviser censured / no retraining, suspension or cancellation necessary in light of steps taken / adviser fined $2,500 financial penalty / adviser ordered to pay $2,281 in compensation, reflecting costs of visitor visa and emotional distress exacerbated by adviser’s misleading behaviour
  23. [2025] NZIACDT 54 - SC v Wharekura (15 October 2025) [PDF, 242 KB]

    Sanctions / widespread failings in communications with client and INZ / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl17a, cl17b, cl17c, cl19e, cl19h, cl19i, cl19k, cl19l, cl19m, cl19n, cl22, cl26aiii, cl26aiv, cl26b, cl26c, cl26d / extensive wrongdoing, resulting in 12 breaches of 16 standards in the Code / moderate gravity of offending / most serious breaches involved grossly inadequate services agreement and failure to comply with client’s instruction to remove partner from residence application / adviser bears responsibility for decline of application notwithstanding INZ’s misapplication of policy / adviser acknowledged wrongdoing and made  considerable efforts to improve practice / adviser censured / no retraining necessary in light of steps taken / adviser fined $2,500 financial penalty / adviser ordered to pay $8,240.44 in compensation, reflecting costs of IPT appeal and relocation.
  24. [2025] NZIACDT 53 - LN v Rabuku (14 October 2025) [PDF, 199 KB]

    Sanctions / adviser failed to respond to client’s text messages and was dilatory in filing visa application / visa application filed more than five months after ascertaining required information / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl22, cl24a, cl24b, cl24c, cl25a, cl25b, cl25e, cl25f, cl26a, cl26c, cl26d, cl26e, cl28a, cl28c / first appearance before Tribunal / adviser held provisional licence at time of wrongdoing / gravity of wrongdoing at high end of moderate level / unprofessional conduct aggravated by her failure to participate in the disciplinary process / breadth of wrongdoing and lack of participation in disciplinary process necessitate further professional training before return to profession / adviser censured / prevented from reapplying for licence prior to completion of professional development course / ordered to pay $5,000 financial penalty
  25. [2025] NZIACDT 52 - SH v McGarrigle (10 October 2025) [PDF, 152 KB]

    Professional responsibilities and professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl5, cl6, cl19l, cl26f / complainant engaged adviser to seek visa for adult daughter / adviser incorrectly advised complainant that the client was beyond the dependence age and could only apply for a visitor, student or work visa / no evidence that client was unwilling to fund more expensive residence application / breach of cl1 / adviser failed to disclose entitlement to commission from private business school and obtain informed consent from complainant in writing / no eventual receipt of commission no defence / breaches of cl5 and cl6 / adviser failed to comply with complainant’s request for full client file / inappropriately required client to complete authority to send request for information to INZ / breaches of cl1 and cl26f / alternative negligence heads dismissed / sanctions to follow