• If you are looking for a specific decision with a forward slash in the title (eg, 123/2014), you will need to replace the forward slash with a space (eg, 123 2014), as the website cannot pick up on forward slashes (/) or any other characters.
  • If you are doing a keyword search (eg, sanction), please note that this search will only produce decisions where the keyword appears in the title or decision description. If you want to search the entire decision document for certain keywords, you will need to use full website search located in the top right hand corner of this page.

  • If you want to search for a specific section of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 or clause of the Code of Conduct 2014, you must search it as one word with no spaces or brackets. For example, if searching for section 44(2)(a) of the Act, you should enter ‘s442a’ into the keyword search and if searching for clause 19(k) of the Code of Conduct, you should enter ‘cl19k’.

If you want to search for a decision from a particular jurisdiction using the full website search, put both the jurisdiction name and the keyword in the search field (eg, Immigration Advisors Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal sanction).

Search results

848 items matching your search terms

  1. [2025] NZIACDT 08 – JY v Wen (7 February 2025) [PDF, 175 KB]

    Professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl14, cl17a, cl17c cl18a, cl18b, cl20a, cl22 and cl26b / HELD / adviser failed to send draft visa application prior to filing / complainant’s inexperience with English does not justify lack of verification / however, provided adequate information regarding visa category / partial breach of cl1 / did not provide services agreement until after visa approved / significant matters not explained / breaches of cl18a and cl18b / failed to provide timely invoice for services / failed to provide invoice for alleged resettlement purposes / breach of cl22 / fees charged not fair or reasonable / breach of cl20a / failed to provide evidence of licence and advise of responsibilities and complaints procedure / breaches of cl14, cl17a and cl17c / failed to advise of issues raised by INZ / breach of cl26b / alternative charges of negligence dismissed / complaint partially upheld / sanctions to follow
  2. [2025] NZIACDT 07 - INZ v Tran (22 January 2025) [PDF, 196 KB]

    Sanctions / adviser permitted unlicensed agent to perform work required to be undertaken by the licensed adviser / four heads of complaint involving seven breaches of Code / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s3, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl14, cl17a, cl17b, cl17c, cl18c / HELD / breaches of fundamental obligations to personally contract with and engage with visa applicant / adviser contributed to creating an environment for fraud to be perpetrated / moderate gravity of misconduct / first appearance before Tribunal / adviser expressed remorse albeit did not accept more serious breaches in explanation to Authority and made no submission to Tribunal prior to decision / offered no apology for more serious conduct, only certain failings / contrition not fulsome / breaches of core obligations warrant censure / adviser surrendered license / further training not required / refund or compensation not sought / adviser censured / ordered to pay $4,000 financial penalty
  3. [2025] NZIACDT 05 – YI v Liu (14 January 2025) [PDF, 160 KB]

    Professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl14, cl18a, cl22, cl26aiii and cl26b / HELD / adviser permitted unlicensed agent to perform work required to be undertaken by licensed adviser (‘rubber stamping’) / fundamental obligation to engage directly and personally / breach of cl2e / no services agreement / breach of cl18a / failed to provide evidence of licence / breach of cl14 / failed to provide client opportunity to review INZ application / breach of cl1 / declaration to INZ concerning advice “for” client not false or misleading / no breach of cl1 or cl31a / failed to personally confirm application lodged and provide timely updates / breach of cl26b / failed to provide complete record of communications / breach of cl26aiii / failed to issue invoice / breach of cl22 / retention of invoice not in issue / no breach of cl26aiv / alternative charge of negligence dismissed / complaint partially upheld / sanctions to follow
  4. [2025] NZIACDT 06 – DH v Liu (14 January 2025) [PDF, 252 KB]

    Professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl14, cl18a, cl22, cl26aiii and cl26b / HELD / adviser permitted unlicensed agent to perform work required to be undertaken by licensed adviser (‘rubber stamping’) / fundamental obligation to engage directly and personally / breach of cl2e / no services agreement / breach of cl18a / failed to provide evidence of licence / breach of cl14 / failed to provide client opportunity to review INZ application / breach of cl1 / declaration to INZ concerning advice “for” client not false or misleading / no breach of cl1 or cl31a / failed to personally confirm application lodged and provide timely updates / breach of cl26b / failed to provide complete record of communications / breach of cl26aiii / failed to issue invoice / breach of cl22 / retention of invoice not in issue / no breach of cl26aiv / alternative charge of negligence dismissed / complaint partially upheld / sanctions to follow
  5. [2025] NZIACDT 04 EI v Liu (14 January 2025) [PDF, 243 KB]

    Professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl14, cl18a, cl22, cl26aiii and cl26b / HELD / adviser permitted unlicensed agent to perform work required to be undertaken by licensed adviser (‘rubber stamping’) / fundamental obligation to engage directly and personally / breach of cl2e / no services agreement / breach of cl18a / failed to provide evidence of licence / breach of cl14 / failed to provide client opportunity to review INZ application / breach of cl1 / declaration to INZ concerning advice “for” client not false or misleading / no breach of cl1 or cl31a / failed to personally confirm application lodged and provide timely updates / breach of cl26b / failed to provide complete record of communications / breach of cl26aiii / failed to issue invoice / breach of cl22 / retention of invoice not in issue / no breach of cl26aiv / alternative charge of negligence dismissed / complaint partially upheld / sanctions to follow
  6. [2025] NZIACDT 03 IX v Liu (14 January 2025) [PDF, 240 KB]

    Professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl14, cl18a, cl22 and cl26b / HELD / adviser permitted unlicensed agent to perform work required to be undertaken by the licensed adviser (‘rubber stamping’) / fundamental obligation to engage directly and personally / breach of cl2e / no services agreement between adviser and complainant / breach of cl18a / failed to provide evidence of being licensed / breach of cl14 / failed to provide client opportunity to review INZ application / breach of cl1 / declaration to INZ concerning advice “for” client not false or misleading / no breach of cl1 or cl31a / failed to personally confirm application lodged and provide timely updates / breach of cl26b / failed to issue invoice / breach of cl22 / retention of invoice not in issue / no breach of cl26aiv / alternative charge of negligence dismissed / complaint partially upheld / sanctions to follow
  7. [2025] NZIACDT 01 – ZJ v Liu (13 January 2025) [PDF, 158 KB]

    Professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl14, cl18a, cl22 and cl26b / HELD / adviser permitted unlicensed agent to perform work required to be undertaken by the licensed adviser (‘rubber stamping’) / fundamental obligation to engage directly and personally / breach of cl2e / no services agreement between adviser and complainant / breach of cl18a / failed to provide evidence of being licensed / breach of cl14 / failed to provide client opportunity to review INZ application / breach of cl1 / declaration to INZ concerning advice “for” client not false or misleading / no breach of cl1 or cl31a / failed to personally confirm application lodged and provide timely updates / breach of cl26b / failed to issue invoice / breach of cl22 / retention of invoice not in issue / no breach of cl26aiv / alternative charge of negligence dismissed / complaint partially upheld / sanctions to follow
  8. [2025] NZIACDT 02 TX v Liu (13 January 2025) [PDF, 241 KB]

    Professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl14, cl18a, cl22 and cl26b / HELD / adviser permitted unlicensed agent to perform work required to be undertaken by the licensed adviser (‘rubber stamping’) / fundamental obligation to engage directly and personally / breach of cl2e / no services agreement between adviser and complainant / breach of cl18a / failed to provide evidence of being licensed / breach of cl14 / failed to provide client opportunity to review INZ application / breach of cl1 / declaration to INZ concerning advice “for” client not false or misleading / no breach of cl1 or cl31a / failed to personally confirm application lodged and provide timely updates / breach of cl26b / failed to issue invoice / breach of cl22 / retention of invoice not in issue / no breach of cl26aiv / alternative charge of negligence dismissed / complaint partially upheld / sanctions to follow
  9. [2024] NZIACDT 32 - XI v Liu (16 December 2024) [PDF, 237 KB]

    Professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl4a, cl14, cl18a, cl22, cl26aiii and cl26b / HELD / adviser permitted unlicensed agent to perform work required to be undertaken by the licensed adviser (‘rubber stamping’) / fundamental obligation to engage directly and personally / breach of cl2e / no services agreement between adviser and complainant / breach of cl18a / failed to provide evidence of being licensed / breach of cl14 / failed to provide client opportunity to review INZ application / breach of cl1 / declaration to INZ concerning advice “for” client not false or misleading / no breach of cl1 or cl31a / failed to personally confirm application lodged and provide updates / breach of cl26b / failed to provide written communications to Authority / breach of cl26iii / failed to issue invoice / breach of cl22 / retention of invoice not in issue / no breach of cl26aiv / complaint partially upheld / sanctions to follow
  10. [2024] NZIACDT 31 – HG v Liu (16 December 2024) [PDF, 158 KB]

    Professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl4a, cl14, cl18a, cl22 and cl26b / HELD / adviser permitted unlicensed agent to perform work required to be undertaken by the licensed adviser (‘rubber stamping’) / fundamental obligation to engage directly and personally / breach of cl2e / no services agreement between adviser and complainant / breach of cl18a / failed to provide evidence of being licensed / breach of cl14 / failed to provide client opportunity to review INZ application / breach of cl1 / declaration to INZ concerning advice “for” client not false or misleading / no breach of cl1 or cl31a / failed to personally confirm application lodged and provide timely updates / breach of cl26b / failed to issue invoice / breach of cl22 / retention of invoice not in issue / no breach of cl26aiv / alternative charge of negligence dismissed / complaint partially upheld / sanctions to follow
  11. [2024] NZIACDT 30 INZ v Li (6 December 2024) [PDF, 250 KB]

    Professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2a, cl2e, cl4a, cl8a, cl14, cl18b, cl26b and cl31a / HELD / adviser permitted unlicensed agent to perform work required to be undertaken by the licensed adviser (‘rubber stamping’) / fundamental obligation to engage directly and personally / breach of cl2e / provided false or misleading documentation to INZ concerning provision of advice to client, no evidence of wilful deception / breach of cl31a / forwarded client’s confidential information to unlicensed adviser / breach of cl4a / failed to provide evidence of being licensed and explain all significant matters / breaches of cl14 and cl18b / failed to provide client opportunity to review INZ application / breach of cl1 / failed to confirm application lodged and provide timely updates / breach of cl26b / failed to maintain relationship of confidence and trust / breach of cl2a / failure to facilitate interpreter-translator inapplicable a…
  12. [2024] NZIACDT 29 INZ v Li (6 December 2024) [PDF, 253 KB]

    Professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2a, cl2e, cl4a, cl8a, cl14, cl18b, cl26b and cl31a / HELD / adviser permitted unlicensed agent to perform work required to be undertaken by the licensed adviser (‘rubber stamping’) / fundamental obligation to engage directly and personally / breach of cl2e / provided false or misleading documentation to INZ concerning provision of advice to client, no evidence of wilful deception / breach of cl31a / forwarded client’s confidential information to unlicensed adviser / breach of cl4a / failed to provide evidence of being licensed and explain all significant matters / breaches of cl14 and cl18b / failed to provide client opportunity to review INZ application / breach of cl1 / failed to confirm application lodged and provide timely updates / breach of cl26b / failed to maintain relationship of confidence and trust / breach of cl2a / failure to facilitate interpreter-translator inapplicable a…
  13. [2024] NZIACDT 28 - EM v Ma (4 December 2024) [PDF, 214 KB]

    Sanctions / adviser permitted unlicensed agent to perform work required to be undertaken by the licensed adviser / no recorded written communications during engagement / eight breaches of Code / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s3, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl14, cl18b, cl26aiii, cl26b, cl26c, cl31a / HELD / breach of fundamental obligation of advisers to personally engage with visa applicant / enabling agent to deal exclusively with complainant contributed to creating an environment for fraud to be perpetrated despite attendance to substantive immigration issues / partial, rather than complete, ‘rubber stamping’ / moderate gravity of misconduct / second appearance before Tribunal / adviser apologised for misconduct / unclear whether adviser understands obligation to engage directly with client and document communications / no evidence of dishonesty / adviser censured / no modification to ongoing suspension order required / directed to undertake training / $5,…
  14. [2024] NZIACDT 27 - INZ v Tran (20 November 2024) [PDF, 230 KB]

    Professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s45, s49, s50 and s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl14, cl17 and cl18b / HELD / adviser had little or no direct communication with client / agent could not sign service contract on client’s behalf in absence of disability or other compelling reason / client’s mother’s consent irrelevant / adviser must ensure client personally signs and understands contract / breach of cl18c and cl1 / permitted unlicensed agent to perform work required to be undertaken by the licensed adviser / ‘rubber stamping’ / failed to directly and personally inform the client and obtain informed instructions / breach of cl2e and cl1 / failed to provide evidence of licence to client / recording status as adviser in e-mail signature insufficient / breach of cl14 and cl1 / failed to provide client with summary and explanation of professional responsibilities, complaints procedure and Code / breach of cl17 / complaint upheld / sanctions to follow
  15. [2024] NZIACDT 26 – QN v Nandan (12 November 2024) [PDF, 227 KB]

    Sanctions / adviser failed to disclose in writing a conflict of interest to employee complainant and consequently did not obtain written informed consent to continued representation / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s3, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl5, cl6 / HELD / complainant aware of existence of conflict but may not have appreciated implications of conflict / adviser unable to provide independent advice to employee / gravity of wrongdoing properly assessed as lower end of moderate / adviser cooperated with Authority and Tribunal / adviser disputed breach at hearing but since expressed appreciation of wrongdoing / second appearance before Tribunal / previous complaint of limited relevance / adviser no longer practicing as immigration adviser, but consumer protection interests support need for general deterrence / claim for compensation failed to establish damages or losses arose due to complainant’s misconduct / adviser censured / ordered to pay $2,500 financial penalty
  16. [2024] NZIACDT 25 - EM v Ma (25 October 2024) [PDF, 244 KB]

    Professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl14, cl18b, cl26aiii, cl26b, cl26c and cl31a / HELD / dishonesty heads of complaint dismissed due to lack of complainant response / insufficient evidence to find written agreement not genuine, but among worst example of record keeping before Tribunal / breach of cl1 partially upheld / unauthorised delegation to adviser; one interview with complainant wholly inadequate / rubber stamping / breach of cl2e / failed to provide evidence of license / breach of cl14 / failed to explain all significant matters / breach of cl18b / no recorded written communications during engagement / breach of cl26aiii and c / failed to confirm application lodged and provide timely updates / breach of cl26b / incorrectly, negligently failed to declare assistance to INZ / breach of cl 1 and 31a / failure to notify INZ of adviser not false or deceptive misrepresentation of client / no breach of cl 29d / sanct…
  17. [2024] NZIACDT 24 – FM v Yang (23 October 2024) [PDF, 108 KB]

    Sanctions / adviser permitted unlicensed agent to perform work required to be undertaken by the licensed adviser / eight to nine breaches of Code / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s3, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl17a, cl17a, cl18b, cl22, cl23, cl26b and cl26c / HELD / breach of fundamental obligation of advisers to personally engage with visa applicant / enabling agent to deal exclusively with complainant contributed to creating an environment for fraud to be perpetrated despite attendance to substantive immigration issues / moderate gravity of misconduct / first appearance before Tribunal / co-operated throughout complaint process but consistently denied wrongdoing / since expressed remorse and implemented new procedures to prevent wrongdoing / further training not required / breach of core obligation warrants censure / lower end of moderate penalty appropriate / refund or compensation not sought / adviser censured / ordered to pay $3,000 financial penalty
  18. [2024] NZIACDT 23 - FM v Yang (03 September 2024) [PDF, 263 KB]

    Professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl17a, cl17a, cl18b, cl22, cl23, cl26b and cl26c / HELD / adviser permitted an unlicensed agent to perform work required to be undertaken by the licensed adviser (‘rubber stamping’) / Tribunal rejected license’s suggestion that complainant had sought exclusive communication through agent / in any event, complainant’s authorisation would not usurp adviser’s statutory duties / adviser contributed to creating an environment for fraud to be perpetrated / however, no evidence of illegitimate commission received by adviser / failed to directly provide invoice and receipt to complainant / did not confirm in writing to the client when visa application was lodged and approved / complaint partially upheld / sanctions to follow
  19. [2024] NZIACDT 22 – QN v Nandan (29 August 2024) [PDF, 229 KB]

    Conflict of interest and professional practice / Code of Conduct 2014, cl18a, cl26aiii, cl26b, cl26d, cl26e, cl26f, cl29a, cl31a / HELD / Tribunal declined Registrar to cross-examine adviser in complainant’s absence / dishonesty and withholding information complaints cannot be sustained without complainant’s evidence, dismissed / disciplinary threshold / breach of cl26b but does not warrant disciplinary action / client knew of visa decision regardless / breach of cl18, cl26aiii, cl26d & cl26e but does not warrant disciplinary action / inadequate response to Registrar explained (not excused) by inadequate file and being overseas; inadequate file itself and lack of written agreement explained (not excused) by relationship with client (employee and friend) / breach of cl5 & cl6 by acting for employee without disclosure in writing and written consent / complaint partially upheld
  20. [2024] NZIACDT 21 KL v Lawlor (sanctions) (19 July 2024) [PDF, 215 KB]

    Sanctions / adviser gave incorrect advice regarding impact of travel on residence visa application / filed application while complainant was overseas / failed to provide draft application to complainant and to fully respond to INZ’s concern / failed to comply with invoice and client fund rules / failure to tell complainant of outcome and provide timely updates / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s3, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl22, cl25a, cl25b, cl25e, cl25f, cl26b / HELD / fifth appearance before Tribunal / lack of, inattention to, or disregard for basic immigration knowledge / advice sought critical to complainant’s circumstances / aggravated by previous disciplinary history / failure to learn from previous disciplinary action / protection of public required / adviser censured / prevented from reapplying for licence for further two years / ordered to pay $5,000 financial penalty / ordered to pay $6,600 in compensation and refund
  21. [2024] NZIACDT 20 – LB v Luv (8 July 2024) [PDF, 213 KB]

    Sanctions / adviser did not inform complainant of futility of residence visa application / no written acknowledgement from complainant of such advice / charged excessive fee / failed to maintain consistent communication with complainant / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s3, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl9, c24, c26 / HELD / first appearance before Tribunal / misconduct towards lower end of moderate level / no apology to complainant / adviser failed to accept that she had failed to inform complainant of lack of eligibility / nonetheless demonstrated level of acceptance of Tribunal’s findings / acknowledged valuable lesson to be learned / no training required / no need to denounce misconduct / adviser cautioned / ordered to pay $3,500 financial penalty / ordered to pay $6,810 refund / compensation of $29,000 refused as no evidence that claimed expenses causally related to adviser’s wrongdoing
  22. [2024] NZIACDT 19 – SC v Murthy (21 June 2024) [PDF, 244 KB]

    Sanctions / adviser failed to recognise complainant’s ineligibility for visa / failed to obtain complete file before application / failed to recognise that visa application was futile and to obtain complainant’s written consent / failed to conduct oneself with professionalism, diligence and due care / negligence / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s3, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl9 / HELD / sixth appearance before Tribunal / moderate to serious gravity of offending in totality / wrongdoing occurred prior to training directed by Tribunal arising from separate proceedings / adviser commended for new extensive systems introduced to reduce risk of ‘paperwork’ offending / demonstrated insight into failings by taking practical steps to improve processes / further training not necessary / notwithstanding lack of apology, threshold for suspension not met / adviser censured / ordered to pay $6,000 financial penalty / ordered to pay $4,660 in compensation and refund
  23. [2024] NZIACDT 18 – KL v Lawlor (24 May 2024) [PDF, 145 KB]

    Diligence and due care / professional practice / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl22, cl25a, cl25b, cl25e, cl25f, cl26b / HELD / breach of cl1 / gave incorrect advice to complainant regarding impact of travel on 2021 Resident Visa application / filed application while complainant was overseas / failed to provide draft application to complainant for review before filing / failed to deal with INZ’s concern about complainant’s travel at time of application / breach of cl22, cl25a, cl25b, cl25e, cl25f / failed to provide invoice / adviser does not deny breaching obligations regarding client funds / no evidence he still holds complainant’s funds in client account / breach of cl26b / failed to reply to complainant’s requests for updates / failed to inform complainant of outcome of application / complaint upheld
  24. [2024] NZIACDT 17 – LB v Luv (23 May 2024) [PDF, 298 KB]

    Diligence and due care / professional responsibilities and professional practice / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl9b, cl20a, cl24a, cl24b, cl24c, cl25a, cl25f, cl26b / HELD / no breach cl1 / insufficient evidence adviser did not realise complainant’s work experience was ineligible for points under skilled migrant category / breach of cl9b / adviser did not inform complainant of futility of application / no written acknowledgement from complainant of such advice / complainant’s general text message or signature on service agreement insufficient / no breach of cl20a / breach of cl24a / adviser failed to offer refund when services terminated or when complainant requested refund / no breach of cl24b, cl25a and cl25f / adviser entitled to fee in accordance with service agreement / breach of cl26b / adviser tardy in communications with complainant / delays not justified by holiday period and other personal and professional commitments / complaint partially upheld
  25. [2024] NZIACDT 16 – LT v Registrar (23 May 2024) [PDF, 139 KB]

    Appeal against Registrar rejecting complaint / complaint adviser intentionally inserted incorrect occupation code in work visa application leading to decline / Registrar rejected complaint on basis it disclosed only a trivial or inconsequential matter / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1 / HELD / no evidence adviser intentionally or dishonestly inserted incorrect code / adviser believed in good faith incorrect code was a better match for complainant’s occupation / incorrect code did not lead to decline of visa / visa declined as INZ required report from employer, but employer refused / employer’s refusal not caused by adviser inserting incorrect code / employer was always unsupportive / adviser breached cl1 by failing to send draft application to complainant prior to filing, which would have allowed complainant to insert correct code / correction would have made no difference to outcome as employer not prepared to cooperate / breach does not warrant disciplinary action / appeal rejected