Ministry of Justice

Sanctions / adviser failed to directly communicate or engage with client, breaching seven professional obligations / client wound up as a victim of immigration fraud  / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s3, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl14, cl18a, cl22, cl26aiii, cl26b / HELD / eight identical complaints against adviser / first appearance before Tribunal / direct engagement a fundamental obligation of advisers, failure enabled immigration fraud to occur / serious consequences for client / failure to have written services agreement with client a major departure from expected standards / gravity of wrongdoing at high end of moderate / no real remorse / adviser censured and Tribunal denounces breaches of Code / further training unnecessary as adviser has implemented practices to prevent repeat / ordered to pay $4,000 financial penalty

Sanctions / adviser failed to directly communicate or engage with client, breaching nine professional obligations / client wound up as a victim of immigration fraud  / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s3, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2a, cl2e, cl4a, cl8a, cl14, cl18b, cl 26b, cl31a / HELD / two identical complaints against adviser / in essence, second appearance before Tribunal / serious consequences for client / wrongdoing at higher end of moderate in terms of gravity / adviser readily acknowledged wrongdoing and shows genuine remorse / adviser censured and Tribunal denounces lack of direct communication / further training unnecessary as adviser understands obligation to communicate directly with clients / ordered to pay $5,000 financial penalty

Professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl14, cl17a, cl17c cl18a, cl18b, cl20a, cl22 and cl26b / HELD / adviser failed to send draft visa application prior to filing / complainant’s inexperience with English does not justify lack of verification / however, provided adequate information regarding visa category / partial breach of cl1 / did not provide services agreement until after visa approved / significant matters not explained / breaches of cl18a and cl18b / failed to provide timely invoice for services / failed to provide invoice for alleged resettlement purposes / breach of cl22 / fees charged not fair or reasonable / breach of cl20a / failed to provide evidence of licence and advise of responsibilities and complaints procedure / breaches of cl14, cl17a and cl17c / failed to advise of issues raised by INZ / breach of cl26b / alternative charges of negligence dismissed / complaint partially upheld / sanctions to follow

Professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl14, cl18a, cl22, cl26aiii and cl26b / HELD / adviser permitted unlicensed agent to perform work required to be undertaken by licensed adviser (‘rubber stamping’) / fundamental obligation to engage directly and personally / breach of cl2e / no services agreement / breach of cl18a / failed to provide evidence of licence / breach of cl14 / failed to provide client opportunity to review INZ application / breach of cl1 / declaration to INZ concerning advice “for” client not false or misleading / no breach of cl1 or cl31a / failed to personally confirm application lodged and provide timely updates / breach of cl26b / failed to provide complete record of communications / breach of cl26aiii / failed to issue invoice / breach of cl22 / retention of invoice not in issue / no breach of cl26aiv / alternative charge of negligence dismissed / complaint partially upheld / sanctions to follow

Professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl14, cl18a, cl22, cl26aiii and cl26b / HELD / adviser permitted unlicensed agent to perform work required to be undertaken by licensed adviser (‘rubber stamping’) / fundamental obligation to engage directly and personally / breach of cl2e / no services agreement / breach of cl18a / failed to provide evidence of licence / breach of cl14 / failed to provide client opportunity to review INZ application / breach of cl1 / declaration to INZ concerning advice “for” client not false or misleading / no breach of cl1 or cl31a / failed to personally confirm application lodged and provide timely updates / breach of cl26b / failed to provide complete record of communications / breach of cl26aiii / failed to issue invoice / breach of cl22 / retention of invoice not in issue / no breach of cl26aiv / alternative charge of negligence dismissed / complaint partially upheld / sanctions to follow

Professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl14, cl18a, cl22 and cl26b / HELD / adviser permitted unlicensed agent to perform work required to be undertaken by the licensed adviser (‘rubber stamping’) / fundamental obligation to engage directly and personally / breach of cl2e / no services agreement between adviser and complainant / breach of cl18a / failed to provide evidence of being licensed / breach of cl14 / failed to provide client opportunity to review INZ application / breach of cl1 / declaration to INZ concerning advice “for” client not false or misleading / no breach of cl1 or cl31a / failed to personally confirm application lodged and provide timely updates / breach of cl26b / failed to issue invoice / breach of cl22 / retention of invoice not in issue / no breach of cl26aiv / alternative charge of negligence dismissed / complaint partially upheld / sanctions to follow

Professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl4a, cl14, cl18a, cl22, cl26aiii and cl26b / HELD / adviser permitted unlicensed agent to perform work required to be undertaken by the licensed adviser (‘rubber stamping’) / fundamental obligation to engage directly and personally / breach of cl2e / no services agreement between adviser and complainant / breach of cl18a / failed to provide evidence of being licensed / breach of cl14 / failed to provide client opportunity to review INZ application / breach of cl1 / declaration to INZ concerning advice “for” client not false or misleading / no breach of cl1 or cl31a / failed to personally confirm application lodged and provide updates / breach of cl26b / failed to provide written communications to Authority / breach of cl26iii / failed to issue invoice / breach of cl22 / retention of invoice not in issue / no breach of cl26aiv / complaint partially upheld / sanctions to follow

Professional practice / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2a, cl2e, cl4a, cl8a, cl14, cl18b, cl26b and cl31a / HELD / adviser permitted unlicensed agent to perform work required to be undertaken by the licensed adviser (‘rubber stamping’) / fundamental obligation to engage directly and personally / breach of cl2e / provided false or misleading documentation to INZ concerning provision of advice to client, no evidence of wilful deception / breach of cl31a / forwarded client’s confidential information to unlicensed adviser / breach of cl4a / failed to provide evidence of being licensed and explain all significant matters / breaches of cl14 and cl18b / failed to provide client opportunity to review INZ application / breach of cl1 / failed to confirm application lodged and provide timely updates / breach of cl26b / failed to maintain relationship of confidence and trust / breach of cl2a / failure to facilitate interpreter-translator inapplicable a…

Sanctions / adviser permitted unlicensed agent to perform work required to be undertaken by the licensed adviser / no recorded written communications during engagement / eight breaches of Code / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s3, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl14, cl18b, cl26aiii, cl26b, cl26c, cl31a / HELD / breach of fundamental obligation of advisers to personally engage with visa applicant / enabling agent to deal exclusively with complainant contributed to creating an environment for fraud to be perpetrated despite attendance to substantive immigration issues / partial, rather than complete, ‘rubber stamping’ / moderate gravity of misconduct / second appearance before Tribunal / adviser apologised for misconduct / unclear whether adviser understands obligation to engage directly with client and document communications / no evidence of dishonesty / adviser censured / no modification to ongoing suspension order required / directed to undertake training / $5,…

Sanctions / adviser failed to disclose in writing a conflict of interest to employee complainant and consequently did not obtain written informed consent to continued representation / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s3, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl5, cl6 / HELD / complainant aware of existence of conflict but may not have appreciated implications of conflict / adviser unable to provide independent advice to employee / gravity of wrongdoing properly assessed as lower end of moderate / adviser cooperated with Authority and Tribunal / adviser disputed breach at hearing but since expressed appreciation of wrongdoing / second appearance before Tribunal / previous complaint of limited relevance / adviser no longer practicing as immigration adviser, but consumer protection interests support need for general deterrence / claim for compensation failed to establish damages or losses arose due to complainant’s misconduct / adviser censured / ordered to pay $2,500 financial penalty

Sanctions / adviser permitted unlicensed agent to perform work required to be undertaken by the licensed adviser / eight to nine breaches of Code / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s3, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl17a, cl17a, cl18b, cl22, cl23, cl26b and cl26c / HELD / breach of fundamental obligation of advisers to personally engage with visa applicant / enabling agent to deal exclusively with complainant contributed to creating an environment for fraud to be perpetrated despite attendance to substantive immigration issues / moderate gravity of misconduct / first appearance before Tribunal / co-operated throughout complaint process but consistently denied wrongdoing / since expressed remorse and implemented new procedures to prevent wrongdoing / further training not required / breach of core obligation warrants censure / lower end of moderate penalty appropriate / refund or compensation not sought / adviser censured / ordered to pay $3,000 financial penalty

Conflict of interest and professional practice / Code of Conduct 2014, cl18a, cl26aiii, cl26b, cl26d, cl26e, cl26f, cl29a, cl31a / HELD / Tribunal declined Registrar to cross-examine adviser in complainant’s absence / dishonesty and withholding information complaints cannot be sustained without complainant’s evidence, dismissed / disciplinary threshold / breach of cl26b but does not warrant disciplinary action / client knew of visa decision regardless / breach of cl18, cl26aiii, cl26d & cl26e but does not warrant disciplinary action / inadequate response to Registrar explained (not excused) by inadequate file and being overseas; inadequate file itself and lack of written agreement explained (not excused) by relationship with client (employee and friend) / breach of cl5 & cl6 by acting for employee without disclosure in writing and written consent / complaint partially upheld

Sanctions / adviser did not inform complainant of futility of residence visa application / no written acknowledgement from complainant of such advice / charged excessive fee / failed to maintain consistent communication with complainant / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s3, s50, s51 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl9, c24, c26 / HELD / first appearance before Tribunal / misconduct towards lower end of moderate level / no apology to complainant / adviser failed to accept that she had failed to inform complainant of lack of eligibility / nonetheless demonstrated level of acceptance of Tribunal’s findings / acknowledged valuable lesson to be learned / no training required / no need to denounce misconduct / adviser cautioned / ordered to pay $3,500 financial penalty / ordered to pay $6,810 refund / compensation of $29,000 refused as no evidence that claimed expenses causally related to adviser’s wrongdoing