Ministry of Justice

Sanctions decision / complaint upheld by Tribunal / MG v Hu [2019] NZIACDT 20 / long term business vis / conflict of interest / advisor acted for vendor of business and client / party to providing false information to Immigration New Zealand (INZ) / Code of Conduct 2014, cl11b / cl15a and cl3a / HELD / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s50 and s51 / power to award sanctions / Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 / Dentice v Valuers Registration Board [1992] 1 NZLR 720 (HC) / Liston v Director of Proceedings [2018] NZHC 2981 / professional disciplinary proceedings focused on protection of the public and profession, not punishment / Patel v Complaints Assessment Committee HC Auclkand CVI-2007-404-1818, 13 August 2007 / advisor accepts responsibility for breaches of the Code of Conduct / further breaches unlikely / advisor has taken steps to ensure compliance with obligations/ s51a / advisor cautioned.

Final decision / complaint upheld by Tribunal / interim decision Abellera v Elizabeth [2017] NZIACDT 17 / breach of professional obligations and Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 (the Act) / failure to tailor written agreement to client / failure to issue refund / demand to withdraw complaint in exchange for refund / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl19e cl24a and cl24e / adviser apologised and accepted responsibility / refund issued / no further sanction appropriate / complaint upheld.

Sanctions decision / complaint upheld by Tribunal / Singh v Patel [2019] NZIADCT 17 / failed to make a record of meetings and discussions with client / failed to confirm material discussions in writing / Code of Conduct 2014, cl26aiii and cl26c / HELD / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s50 and s51 / power to award sanctions / Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 / Dentice v Valuers Registration Board [1992] 1 NZLR 720 (HC) / Liston v Director of Proceedings [2018] NZHC 2981 / professional disciplinary proceedings focused on protection of the public and profession, not punishment / Patel v Complaints Assessment Committee HC Auckland CIV-2007-404-1818, 13 August 2007 / advisor aware of need to improve file management / advisor has taken steps to ensure compliance with obligations / s50b / no further sanctions are warranted

Breach of professional obligations and Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 (the Act) / delays in lodging EOI and communicating with complainant / failure to maintain and make available client file for inspection / s571c of the Act  / lack of professionalism, due care and diligence / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1 and cl26e / Sparks v Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 / Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 / EOI lodgement delays resulted in complainant missing automatic selection / communication delays were unreasonable / client file retained by adviser’s former employer / adviser must make reasonable efforts to obtain file / Jiang v Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal [2018] NZHC 3152 / file was that of the firm and not the adviser / advisers obligation under cl26e to provide file to Authority must be consistent with s571c / complaint upheld.

Rubber stamping / six heads of complaint relating to 12 clients / Immigration adviser’s business practice contrary to professional obligations and Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 (the Act) / s7 and s5 of the Act / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl3c, cl18b, cl19e & cl19f and cl26b / Sparks v Immigration Advisers Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal [2017] NZHC 376 / Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee [2008] NZSC 55, [2009] 1 NZLR 1 / lack of professionalism and due care / failure to engage with clients / unlicensed staff providing immigration advice, not just clerical work / significant matters in agreement not discussed with clients / full description of services and fees not specified in agreement / failure to provide ongoing timely updates to clients on immigration applications / complaint upheld.

Sanctions decision / unprofessional & disrespectful communications with INZ / adviser made personal attacks against individual officers / adviser withheld information from client / adviser copied unconnected people in confidential client correspondence / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s50, s51 / government agencies should not be unduly sensitive to criticism / communications crossed disciplinary threshold but not at upper end of unprofessional communications or malicious / withholding information isolated incident & did not cause decline of application / adviser refused to get clients’ consent to copy other people in correspondence / potential violations aggravated by contempt of code & disciplinary regime / adviser censured & ordered to pay $2,500 penalty.

Sanctions decision / rubber stamping / all communications made via Chinese migration company / staff work not clerical work / bulk of complainant’s instructions carried out by company / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s50, s51 / second complaint upheld / adviser already prohibited from licence for two years / misconduct serious / adviser enabled unlicensed persons to provide immigration advice & failed to personally discharge immigration services / violation not wilful / adviser believed Chinese law did not permit him to engage with complainant / adviser wrongly believed staff were performing permitted clerical work / adviser retired & licence expired / adviser censured & prevented from reapplying for licence for two years.

Facilitating unlicensed person to give unlawful immigration advice / adviser ran seminars overseas providing information on immigration criteria in New Zealand / speaker at seminars not licensed / complaint made by another adviser that seminars contained incorrect information / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl3c, cl29 / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / no evidence adviser’s strategy for clients not viable / motive of complainant irrelevant / immigration advice given by unlicensed person / irrelevant that speaker licensed in Germany to give advice about New Zealand immigration / adviser endorsed strategy & seminars traded on adviser being licensed in New Zealand / adviser facilitated speaker’s behaviour / complaint upheld.

Excessive fees / failure to record meetings and discussions / residence application / adviser charged $15,000 standard fee / adviser prepared application which required analysis of financial information / complainant signed application & paid second instalment of fees / complainant changed his mind & requested withdrawal of application & full refund of fees / complainant terminated agreement / adviser offered a partial refund / Code of Conduct 2014, cl20, cl24, cl26 / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / adviser should have recorded material discussions in writing / fee at higher end of scale but not unfair or unreasonable / urgency relevant factor in setting fee / adviser carried out substantial work at time agreement was terminated / work largely completed & only some documents outstanding / refund fair / adviser under no obligation to refund more than small part of fee / complaint upheld.

Rubber stamping / adviser director of company providing student placement services / complainant & son applied for visitor visa before student visa / unlicensed staff prepared application / application declined because it did not disclose son’s placement offer & INZ concerned it was not genuine / adviser not involved with application but finalised letter in response to INZ concerns / adviser not involved in management of company & believed it only provided placement services / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl3c / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / any competent adviser would have realised unlicensed staff providing advice on receiving draft response letter / business structure not designed to circumvent legislation & no pattern of misconduct / violation at lower end of rubber stamping spectrum but still serious / adviser facilitated conduct of unlicensed staff in finalising letter to INZ / adviser not professional or diligent & did not exercise due care / complaint upheld.

Unprofessional & disrespectful communications with INZ / adviser’s communications criticised INZ staff for being incompetent & threatened to raise complaint with government agency / INZ staff felt belittled, stressed, incompetent, upset & bullied by communications / adviser copied communications to lawyer & another adviser / INZ’s character concerns not brought to client’s attention / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s442 / Code of Conduct 2014, cl1, cl2e, cl4a / adviser’s criticisms unprofessional & crossed disciplinary threshold / tone & text went beyond robust advocacy & amounted to unjustified personal attacks / communications not at upper end of being unprofessional / criticisms & threats unjustified but not offensive or intimidating in unlawful sense / adviser honestly believed clients wronged / adviser withheld information & failed to obtain client’s informed instructions / adviser breached client confidentiality / complaint upheld.

Sanctions decision / incompetence / adviser failed to compile & file entrepreneur work & residence visa applications / complainants purchased motel but contract for sale lapsed / complainants provided business plan but plan never finalised / applications envisaged never made & complainants suffered significant loss / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s50, s51 / censure & training justified by level of adviser’s incompetence / incompetence not sufficient to prevent re-licensing / no other instances of incompetence / adviser acknowledged wrongdoing & offered refund / adviser not primary or real cause of complainants’ losses / Parliament only intended modest awards of compensation / unreasonable for complainants to rely on adviser solely for investment advice / adviser censured, ordered to complete training, pay penalty of $3000 & $17,500 refund of fees, plus any interest earned on $17,500.

Sanctions decision / failure to perform services with due care, diligence and professionalism / client’s work visa declined so client in New Zealand unlawfully / application for exception to immigration instructions under s61 / adviser recommended making formal complaint to INZ & appealing deportation on humanitarian grounds but both declined / adviser then advised client to lodge a request for student visa / Tribunal found adviser’s approach misguided & devoid of merit / strategy costly & compromised client’s prospects of success / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s50, s51 / breach not an isolated error of judgement / adviser lacked sufficient knowledge & skill / financial penalty not necessary in public interest / fees paid & cost of appeal wasted / no compensation recoverable as living expenses & costs of another adviser did not flow from unprofessional advice / adviser ordered to complete training & refund fees of $2,900.