• If you are looking for a specific decision with a forward slash in the title (eg, 123/2014), you will need to replace the forward slash with a space (eg, 123 2014), as the website cannot pick up on forward slashes (/) or any other characters.
  • If you are doing a keyword search (eg, sanction), please note that this search will only produce decisions where the keyword appears in the title or decision description. If you want to search the entire decision document for certain keywords, you will need to use full website search located in the top right hand corner of this page.

  • If you want to search for a specific section of the Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007 or clause of the Code of Conduct 2014, you must search it as one word with no spaces or brackets. For example, if searching for section 44(2)(a) of the Act, you should enter ‘s442a’ into the keyword search and if searching for clause 19(k) of the Code of Conduct, you should enter ‘cl19k’.

If you want to search for a decision from a particular jurisdiction using the full website search, put both the jurisdiction name and the keyword in the search field (eg, Immigration Advisors Complaints and Disciplinary Tribunal sanction).

Search results

872 items matching your search terms

  19. [2026] NZIACDT 51 - DD v Registrar of Immigration Advisers (15 September 2026) [PDF, 200 KB]

    Appeal against Registrar rejecting complaint / complaint advisers misled appellant about ability to work after entering New Zealand on guardian visa accompanying daughter on student visa / appellant said advisers failed to explain limitations, costs, risks and process of transitioning to a work visa and did not properly consider her financial need to work / Immigration Advisers Licensing Act 2007, s44, s45, s54 / HELD / evidence showed appellant proposed and agreed to student and guardian visa pathway knowing guardian visa did not permit employment / advisers repeatedly advised that employment would require either a variation of conditions for part-time work or a different visa pathway / appellant did not inform advisers that full-time employment was essential to support her family / isolated email suggesting possible part-time work did not amount to misleading advice when read in context of broader communications / no evidence of incompetence, misleading conduct or breach of Code disclosed by complaint / appeal rejected