Working as an employment investigator without a licence a breach of s23 - warning given - no jurisdiction to deal with other aspects of complaint as not a licence or certificate holder
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
For related District Court decisions refer to the District Court website.
55 items matching your search terms
Working as an employment investigator without a licence a breach of s23 - warning given - no jurisdiction to deal with other aspects of complaint as not a licence or certificate holder
Complaint against Legion Security - operating a security business without a licence, employing security workers with COAs, not keeping proper records-both company and sole director guilty of misconduct - Previous formal warning given - Security licence cancelled but order stayed for four months ss 4, 23, 45, 78, 81, 106 of the PSPPI Act and regulations 5 & 6
Rooney Complaint – Working in security while COA suspended – running a security business without a licence & giving false information to the Authority and CIPU – Misconduct – COA cancelled. SS 4, 23, 44 & 105 of the PSPPI Act
S.E.A.L Security and Kumar Penalty decision – Reprimand, $1,000 fine and condition place on licence prohibiting further recruitment of migrant workers.
CIPU Investigation into company licence holder – Contravention of s 45(1) by engaging security workers without COAs is misconduct – providing misleading information in support of an employees application for a COA is unsatisfactory conduct – fine and reprimand.
Police v Dellaway – disqualifying conviction under s 62(f)(vi) – mandatory ground for cancellation – COA cancelled and company licence suspended under s43(6) for failing to file annual returns
Police v Singh - Disqualifying convictions - no longer suitable to be a security worker - COA and company licence cancelled.
Police complaint upheld - Seki Security Ltd employing non-COA holders - CIPU report - allegations substantiated - breach of condition - company licence cancelled - COA cancelled - finding of misconduct - ss3, 43, 45, 73, 74 80, 83 & 96C of the Act
Complaint against security company and director of employing persons to work unlawfully - company in liquidation and licence cancelled by consent - directors COA renewed but on condition that she must be engaged by a third-party licensee and not manage or run a security business for 2 years.
Re SPS Security Limited - Application for company licence declined as company was guilty of misconduct by operating without a licence, trying to cover up breaches of the Act, and providing misinformation to the Authority and CIPU. Guidelines about steps that need to be taken before new application will be considered.
King's Security & Simpson complaint - engaging security workers without COAs misconduct - carrying on work in a voluntary capacity in classes for which no licence or COA is held is not a breach of the Act but can be a breach of Guidelines for Volunteers and amount to unsatisfactory conduct.
Police v Doherty - complaint about running a security business without a licence - no longer suitable to be a certificate holder due to association with a gang and other concerning behavior - finding of misconduct and no longer suitable to carry on the class of business to which his certificates relates
Turner & Waihape complaint - operating a security business without the required licence is misconduct - penalty reprimand and further training.
Application for an individual licence declined after convictions for obtaining by deception and offences under the PSPPI Act of working as an unlicenced security consultant and personal guard – continued failure to comply with responsibilities of a security business owner – not suitable to be a licence holder.
GM Security Services Contractor Limited & Papaliitele – continual breaches of the Act – licence and COA suspended until annual returns filed.
Tigers Express Security Penalty Decision – cancellation of company licence, fine and conditions attached to company officer’s certificate.
Timoti Police complaint – disqualifying convictions and prison sentence – COA expired – Complaint proved – Penalty barred from holding a certificate of licence for six years.
Complaint that cleaners at a shopping mall were also providing security services without COAs established – company providing cleaning and security services now has a licence – education provided and warning given if any further breaches.
Wood penalty decision – reprimand and fine for established misconduct – refusal to grant company licence for Mr Woods company
Magele & Blade Group Limited complaint – sentenced to imprisonment after tax and related fraud – sentence grounds for disqualification - certificate and licence cancelled.
Ioane complaint – running a business without a licence – working without a COA in required class - threatening and inappropriate behaviour – misconduct – disqualifying conviction – no longer suitable to be a certificate holder – Certificate cancelled.
Contravention of the Act by not obtaining approval for new company officer and engaging non licenced entities to carry out security work amounts to misconduct – Penalty fine and reprimand
Wood complaint – running a property guard business clamping cars without a licence, failing to wear ID or produce on response – misconduct established – penalty adjourned to be considered at time of likely company licence application.
Mulock-Houwer & Centive Technologies Limited - application for COA and security licence – application did not have 12 months security experience but relevant experience in related industry accepted – licence granted with conditions attached to be reviewed after 12 months.
Police Objection - company licence - COA - approved on condition - conviction for violence - Police history - ss62, 63