Ministry of Justice

Applications to review Registrar’s determination and for leave to adduce new evidence / Registrar determined not to pursue complaint as it only disclosed inconsequential matter / Real Estate Agents Act 2008, s743a, s112, s136 / Professional Rules 2012, r6.4, r10.7 / Kacem v Bashir [2010] NZSC 112 / Wilson v Registrar of the Real Estate Agents Authority [2023] NZREADT 2 / HELD / fresh, credible and cogent test for new evidence appropriate for s112 reviews, but should only be applied in context of limited grounds of review in Kacem / applicant had plenty of opportunity to provide evidence to Registrar / evidence credible but not sufficiently cogent to prove Registrar’s decision was wrong / Registrar has discretion to decide if complaint has sufficient evidence or would justify disciplinary response / Registrar not required to conduct investigation / has considered all the evidence provided by parties / no error of fact or law / applications dismissed, Registrar’s decision confirmed

Application to lift non-publication orders and for permission to publish submissions and evidence / cross application for extension of non-publication orders / Tribunal made non-publication order prohibiting publication of purchaser, auctioneer and any third party’s name / appellant subsequently requested a revocation of that order / appellant also requested permission to publish submissions, evidence, witness statements, transcripts, recordings and correspondence / respondent cross-applied to extend non-publication order to cover all evidence and submissions / Real Estate Agents Act 2008, s108 / HELD / Tribunal expressly empowered to revoke existing non-publication order but not to modify it / once decision is published, request for further orders would involve recall of earlier decisions / no miscarriage of justice or other exceptional circumstance established / Tribunal functus officio in relation to publication / appellant and respondent’s requests declined

Liability and penalty / misconduct / licensee charged under s73a for kissing client without consent / Real Estate Agents Act 2008, s3, s73a, s108, s110, s110A / HELD / licensee pled guilty / first appearance before Tribunal / conduct was at high level of misconduct / fell squarely within the concept of disgraceful conduct / conduct was non-consensual and invasive of client’s personal autonomy / went significantly beyond that in Complaints Assessment Committee 1904 v Bright [2022] NZREADT 23 / caused significant impact on client / licensee wrote apology letters to client and Tribunal / acted dishonestly during Committee investigation by advancing false alibi, but subsequently accepted full responsibility / costs reduced due to financial position / permanent name suppression appropriate given clean record, importance of rehabilitation and potential significant impact of publication on licensee’s health / censured / ordered to pay $7,500 financial penalty / 20 per cent costs ($4,422.40)

Penalty / misconduct / licensee found guilty under s73a (disgraceful conduct) for producing false valuation report four times in respect of property he was seeking to acquire an interest in / Real Estate Agents Act 2008, s3, s73, s110, s110A / HELD / licensee forged report for own benefit to proceed with purchase, but no financial benefit gained / dishonesty at higher end of misconduct / honesty essential to achieving purpose of Act / clean record given little weight due to licensee’s short career / expressed remorse in email to Authority, but false reasons given for wrongdoing and lack of engagement with Tribunal show expression is not sincere / no apology or explanation / no confidence licensee learned from complaint / s1102e order necessary to protect public / five year prohibition period appropriate given the conduct was an isolated incident and there was no financial benefit / censured / prohibited from engagement for five years / 50 per cent costs ($14,496.44)

Costs application by licensee / Committee unsuccessful in pursuing misconduct charges / Real Estate Agents Act 2008, s110A / Complaints Assessment Committee 2106 v Mather [2021] NZREADT 54 / HELD / statutory factors justifying costs award not present / no rule that costs follow the event / requires something more than mere failure of prosecution or successful defence / prosecution’s evidence not inherently unreliable or so lacking in credibility that there was insufficient basis to proceed with charges / Committee pursued charges in response to Tribunal’s direction to consider doing so / no fault in Committee giving weight to Tribunal’s view / costs may have been awarded to Committee if successful, but no principle of reciprocity for costs / factor favouring costs for successful prosecution is performance of public regulatory duty, which does not favour successful licensees / long history of proceedings does not justify costs in licensee’s favour / application dismissed

Appeal / licensee failed to disclose prior burglaries and ownership of property in writing / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / purchasers claim compensation for expenses incurred in securing property / licensee challenges costs award / Real Estate Agents Act 2008, s931f, s111, s136 / Professional Rules 2012, r6.4 / HELD / new compensation provisions of Act do not apply as conduct occurred prior to new provisions taking effect / Committee cannot award broad compensation under guise of relief from rectification / tortious measure of damages applicable, rather than expectation damages / purchasers’ claim for compensation failed due to lack of valuation evidence and as expense of securing property not causally connected to licensee’s conduct / costs challenge failed as licensee withdrew appeal against penalty, purchasers’ appeals of Committee’s liability and penalty decisions not hopeless, and no legal basis to stay costs award / appeal dismissed, Committee’s decision confirmed

Application to review Registrar’s determination / Registrar declined licensee’s application to defer completion of required continuing education / Real Estate Agents Act 2008, s54, s55, s112 / Real Estate Agents (Continuing Professional Development Rules) Notice 2018 / HELD / licensee failed to comply with CPD obligations / Registrar correctly followed statutory process in sending required communications to licensee / required communications were received by licensee / licensee’s application for deferral to Registrar made no reference to new information submitted before Tribunal / Registrar made no error of fact or law in its decision to decline licensee’s application for deferral / licensee unable to show that exceptional circumstances prevented her from completing required CPD / application dismissed, Registrar’s decision confirmed

Appeal / licensee misrepresented number of bedrooms in property / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / complainant brought appeal out of time / Real Estate Agents Act 2008, s111 / Catley v Real Estate Agents Authority [2019] NZREADT 57 / Beckett v Real Estate Agents Authority [2019] NZREADT 58 / HELD / complainant sought discussion with lawyer about possible claim in Disputes Tribunal / did not seek advice about appeal to this Tribunal / appeal filed 15 working days late / not a short delay / complainant informed of appeal rights in Committee’s decisions / research about appeal rights could have been done earlier / could have contacted Authority or Tribunal about appeal rights / high threshold for acceptance of late appeal not met / no exceptional circumstances / appeal not accepted

Penalty / unsatisfactory conduct / licensee found guilty under s72a (conduct falling short of expected standard) for miscommunication leaving prospective purchaser to understand he was asked to lie about reason for withdrawing offer / Real Estate Agents Act 2008, s3, s72, s110, s110A / HELD / low level of unsatisfactory conduct / licensee’s communication was garbled / no deceit involved / licensee cannot rely on clean record due to prior finding of unsatisfactory conduct / costs principles in TSM applicable to unsatisfactory conduct cases / orthodox position of 50 per cent costs can be displaced particularly where Committee failed on all charges and unsatisfactory conduct was not advanced by Committee but found by Tribunal / licensee admitted underlying facts early in case and admitted unsatisfactory conduct prior to hearing / no factors in s110A indicate costs should be awarded against licensee / censured / ordered to pay $2,000 financial penalty / no costs order made

Application to review Registrar’s determination / Registrar cancelled licence as licensee failed to complete required continuing education / Real Estate Agents Act 2008, s54d, s55, s112 / Real Estate Agents (Continuing Professional Development Rules) Notice 2018 / HELD / licensee did not file submissions / not disputed that licensee was required to complete CPD by certain date, received required communications from Registrar, and did not complete CPD by deadline / Registrar correctly followed statutory process / Registrar must cancel licence as required by s54d / no error of fact or law / application dismissed, Registrar’s decision confirmed

Liability / misconduct / licensee found guilty of unsatisfactory conduct for giving false answer to question about safety of property and area / whether misconduct charges should be brought referred back to Committee / now charged under s73a or s73b / Real Estate Agents Act 2008, s4, s72, s73 / Professional Rules 2012, r6.4 / HELD / vendor licensee arranging and meeting purchasers on site meets definition of real estate agency work as property was marketed by licensee’s agency / carried out work normally performed by agent and not vendor / vendor conducting services on own behalf complies with definition / licensee asked if property and area was good, not if it was safe / purchasers’ evidence not credible / licensee not deliberately untruthful as previous burglaries not at top of her mind in answering question if area was good / negligently withheld information which should have been provided but was not disgraceful or seriously incompetent or negligent / charges dismissed

Liability / misconduct / licensee charged under s73a or s73ciii for requesting prospective purchaser to lie about reason for withdrawing offer / Real Estate Agents Act 2008, s72, s73, s91, s105, s109, s110 / Professional Rules 2012, r6.3 / HELD / purchaser’s affidavit inconsistent with oral evidence that it was his “impression” the licensee asked him to change withdrawal reason, thus did not establish on balance of probabilities that licensee made the request / Tribunal accepted licensee’s evidence that his message was to point out effect of withdrawal to vendors / misconduct charges require stronger evidence / licensee’s intention for message cannot be proven / licensee’s message consistent with request for purchaser to get second opinion due to discrepancy in repair cost estimates by vendors and building inspector / however, licensee found guilty of unsatisfactory conduct under s72a as purchaser was left with the impression to change withdrawal reason / penalty decision to follow

Compensation referral / ruling on jurisdiction / Committee found licensee guilty of unsatisfactory conduct for failing to disclose reports on damage to property and potential risks / Committee referred compensation to Tribunal under s931ha / Real Estate Agents Act 2008, s12, s72, s89, s93, s106, s110, s111 / Professional Rules 2012, r6.4, r10.7 / HELD / amicus curiae not required to determine Authority’s role or for proceeding to be just / Committee and Authority are not parties to referral / Authority can assist on issues of jurisdiction, powers and procedures, and interpretation of the Act including proper measure of loss, but should be neutral / preliminary view on compensation referral jurisdiction / confined to loss arising from unsatisfactory conduct as found by Committee, but complainant may reformulate compensation claims / must show a Court could order compensation or damages in accordance with law / full, formal procedures for civil claims not appropriate