Application to strike out compensation referral proceedings / Committee found licensee engaged in unsatisfactory conduct in failing to bring complainant’s attention to altered clause, as well as in failing to disclose in writing that he may financially benefit from transaction and to obtain signed acknowledgement / licensee applied to strike out proceedings as parallel civil proceedings had been decided by District Court / Real Estate Agents Act 2008, s109A, s110, s136 / Professional Rules 2012, r5.1, r6.2, r6.3 / HELD / Tribunal noted distinction between legal rights in parallel civil District Court proceedings and present disciplinary proceedings / claim before Tribunal whether complainant should be awarded for any loss suffered by reason of the licensee’s unsatisfactory conduct, rather than breach of contract / nature and extent of claimed losses unclear / relevance of res judicata and issue estoppel to considered in due course / strike-out application dismissed
- Family Court
- Care of Children
- Family Violence
- Kaiārahi - Family Court Navigators
- Separation & divorce
- Keeping children safe
- Relationship property
- Paternity & Child Support
- Adoption & the Family Court
- Challenge a will
- Change the sex/gender on a birth certificate
- Civil restraint orders to prevent meritless cases
- Powers to make decisions for others
- Court ordered treatment
- Information for lawyers & service providers
- Get consent to marry if you’re aged 16 or 17
- How the Family Court can help donor-conceived people
- Litigant Abuse Orders