You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
Helpful search tips:
- If you are looking for a specific decision with a forward slash in the title (eg, 123/2014), you will need to replace the forward slash with a space (eg, 123 2014), as the website cannot pick up on forward slashes (/) or any other characters.
- If you are doing a keyword search (eg. misconduct), please note that this search will only produce decisions where the keyword appears in the title or decision description. If you want to search the entire decision document for certain keywords, you will need to use full website search located in the top right hand corner of this page.
- If you want to search for a decision from a particular jurisdiction using the full website search, put both the jurisdiction name and the keyword in the search field (eg, LCRO misconduct).
-
Pursuant to Section 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, the decision of the Standards Committee is reversed
-
Complaint about fees / Committee determined second complaint about same fees.
-
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is / Reversed / Modified
-
Pursuant to Section 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, the decision of the Standards Committee is reversed
-
Pursuant to Section 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, the decision of the Standards Committee is reversed
-
Standards Committees resolved to lay charges against the practitioner before the LCDT / In 338/2013 the Standards Committee provided no reasons, and had not laid the charges before completion of the Review.
-
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
-
LCRO confirmed Standards Committee decision for no further action / Standards Committee dismissed complaint for lack of sufficient information.
-
Pursuant to Section 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, the decision of the Standards Committee is reversed
-
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
-
Pursuant to section 209(1)(a) of the Act, the Standards Committee decision that no professional conduct issues arose regarding the Practitioner's email address. R 11.1.
-
The application for review is out of time and there is no jurisdiction to consider it.
-
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is Modified
-
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
-
Rules 9.1, 9.6 and 3.4 / Practitioner sought review of Standards Committee finding that his conduct / overcharging / was unsatisfactory, following recommendation of Costs Assessor.
-
LCRO confirmed Standards Committee decision to prosecute / Bias allegations dismissed, costs against Applicant.
-
Pursuant to Section 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, the decision of the Standards Committee is reversed
-
Penalty Decision / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008
-
Reversing a Standards Committee decision / LCRO found legal executive guilty of unsatisfactory conduct for failing to properly discharge duties in relation to administration of estate.
-
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
-
Pursuant to section 211 (1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006
-
Pursuant to s 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 the decision of the Standards Committee is confirmed
-
Pursuant to Section 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, the decision of the Standards Committee is reversed
-
Pursuant to Section 211(1)(a) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, the decision of the Standards Committee is reversed
-
Standards Committee unsatisfactory conduct finding was upheld on review for different reasons / Lawyer's advice on a relationship property agreement fell short of the standard in section 12(a).