You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.

Helpful search tips:

  • If you are looking for a specific decision with a forward slash in the title (eg, 123/2014), you will need to replace the forward slash with a space (eg, 123 2014), as the website cannot pick up on forward slashes (/) or any other characters.
  • If you are doing a keyword search (eg. misconduct), please note that this search will only produce decisions where the keyword appears in the title or decision description. If you want to search the entire decision document for certain keywords, you will need to use full website search located in the top right hand corner of this page.
  • If you want to search for a decision from a particular jurisdiction using the full website search, put both the jurisdiction name and the keyword in the search field (eg, LCRO misconduct).
Search results

1424 items matching your search terms

  1. LCRO 37/2018 AH v OO (12 November 2019) [PDF, 166 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / conveyancing matter / complaint lawyer did not competently advise on due diligence / pre-1 August 2008 conduct / Law Practitioners Act 1982 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, section 351 / Woods v Legal Complaints Review Officer [2013] NZHC 674 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3 / HELD / advice on conveyancing was a breach of rule 3 / Committee’s decision modified to record unsatisfactory conduct pursuant to sections 12(a) and 12(c) / section 211(1)(a)
  5. LCRO 215/2018 WN v ZD (31 October 2019) [PDF, 162 KB]

    Review / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / litigation representation / complaint lawyer failed to keep client informed / whether lawyer has a duty to advise they will be unable to complete retainer due to resignation / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3 / rule 7.1 / HELD / lawyer failed to advise client they had resigned from firm / breach of rule 7.1 / apology / Committee’s decision modified to record unsatisfactory conduct pursuant to sections 12(a) and 12(c) / section 211(1)(a)
  8. LCRO 119/2018 QL v DW (22 October 2019) [PDF, 164 KB]

    Review / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / relationship property agreement / complaint lawyer failed to accurately calculate funds available to client on settlement of property sale / whether lawyer provided competent service / whether lawyer ensured client understood calculations / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3 / rule 7 / rule 7.1 / Daniels v Complaints Committee 2 of the Wellington District Law Society [2011] 3 NZLR 850 (HC) / Workington v Sheffield LCRO 55/2009 (26 August 2009) / HELD / lawyer failed to calculate net proceeds of sale accurately / did not ensure client understood calculations / $2,500 fine / Committee’s decision reversed / section 211(1)(a)
  9. LCRO 192/2017 KY v QW, Official Assignee (27 September 2019) [PDF, 141 KB]

    Review / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / dealing with bankrupt client’s funds / complaint lawyer did not disclose funds held on trust for bankrupt client to Official Assignee, and used funds to pay firm’s and barrister’s outstanding fees / Insolvency Act 2006 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, section 110 / whether firm held a lien over funds / whether lawyer entitled to rely on belief partner had approval from Official Assignee / HELD / lawyer acted without due care in contravention of Insolvency Act 2006 / Committee’s decision confirmed / reversed as to considering whether to publish practitioner’s name / section 211(1)(a)
  10. LCRO 261/2016 TJ v DM and ZP (26 September 2019) [PDF, 196 KB]

    Review / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / relationship property proceedings / widely-cast complaint that lawyers failed to act competently / fee complaint / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Client Care and Conduct) Rules 2008, rule 3 / rule 9.1 / whether Committee reviewed fee complaint correctly / HELD / no evidence of professional standards issue / brief reasons for conclusions on fee review insufficient in the circumstances / Committee did not appoint cost assessor / Committee to reconsider fee complaint / section 209(1)(a) / Committee’s decision otherwise confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  11. LCRO 13/2019 RA v LO (23 September 2019) [PDF, 146 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / protection order proceedings / complaint lawyer was rude to client, pressured client into settling, and included a clause in an undertaking without instructions / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3.1 / rule 7.1 / rule 12 / rule 13.3 / whether lawyer was discourteous / whether lawyer protected client’s interests / HELD / no evidence of professional standards issue / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  12. LCRO 194/2017 MA v NB, OC and PD (20 September 2019) [PDF, 344 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / professional discipline proceedings / complaint lawyers not competent, and conflicted with insurer / R and N Family Trust v EL LCRO 205/2015 (27 June 2019) / Nicholson v Icepak Coolstores Ltd [1999] 3 NZLR 475 (HC) / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3 / rule 6 / rule 6.1 / whether lawyers had sufficient understanding of case before providing advice / HELD / lawyers provided competent representation / no evidence that lawyers were conflicted / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  13. LCRO 130/2017 HS v NC and EH (18 September 2019) [PDF, 260 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / dispute with council and retailer / complaint lawyers acted in excess of instructions / failed to provide client care information / fee complaint / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Client Care and Conduct) Rules 2008, rule 3.4 / rule 3.6 / rule 9 / rule 9.1 / whether lawyers were instructed to act and on what basis / HELD / no evidence of professional standards issue / legal services to be provided covered by retainer and subsequent instructions / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  15. LCRO 207/2018 PC v FM (10 September 2019) [PDF, 499 KB]

    Review / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / advice on a business purchase and lease, renewal / complaint lawyer failed to competently advise client / complainant succeeded in negligence proceedings against lawyers / Yates Property Corp Pty Ltd (in liq) v Boland (1998) 85 FCR 84 (FCAFC) / Robert Bax & Associates v Cavenham Pty Ltd [2012] QCA 177, [2013] 1 Qd R 476 / Kacem v Bashir [2010] NZSC 112, [2011] 2 NZLR 1 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3 / HELD / vulnerable client / did not provide competent advice / although client has obtained civil remedy, unsatisfactory conduct findings warranted / Committee’s decision reversed / section 211(1)(a)
  17. LCRO 10/2018 DO v ABC & Body Corporate (30 August 2019) [PDF, 274 KB]

    Review / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / complaint lawyer communicated directly with other party by speaking at body corporate AGM / lawyer held proxy from unit owners who were in litigation against body corporate, and dissuaded other unit owners from continuing litigation / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 10.2 / whether lawyer entitled to address unit owners while body corporate represented and lawyer not present / HELD / members of body corporate are not the body corporate, but when decision to be made by majority, it is as if the body corporate is being addressed / touchstone of improper conduct is whether lawyer took “undue advantage” in absence of competing professional voice / breach of rule 10.2 / however, finding of unsatisfactory conduct not warranted as conduct was not unprofessional by a clear and distinct margin / Committee’s decision reversed / section 211(1)(a)
  20. LCRO 105/2018 SW v NL (23 August 2019) [PDF, 292 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / relationship property / complaint lawyer acted for both parties on conveyancing transaction / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3 / rule 3.4 / rule 3.5 / rule 6.1 / rule 7 / rule 7.1 / rule 10.1 / whether lawyer acted for both parties in conflict / whether lawyer obtained instructions and kept client informed / HELD / in context, lawyer acted for both parties with more than negligible risk of being unable to discharge obligations / did not obtain informed consent or promptly disclose all information relevant to sale / acted unilaterally to hold proceeds in trust account / $2,000 fine / $1,600 costs / Committee’s decision reversed / section 211(1)(a)
  21. LCRO 108/2018 WR v NS (23 August 2019) [PDF, 243 KB]

    Complaint / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / potential client incapacity / Committee found client probably lacked capacity / determined lawyer failed to protect client’s interests / HELD / Sandman v McKay [2019] NZSC 41 / duty to follow instructions put ahead of any uncertainty about client’s capacity to give instructions / nothing to alert lawyer to possibility client lacked capacity / Committee’s decision reversed / section 211(1)(a)
  22. LCRO 106/2018, 107/2018, 170/2018 and 181/2018 SY, [SAL] and DT v [Area] Standards Committee [X] (22 August 2019) [PDF, 462 KB]

    Review / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / estate administration / complaint lawyers’ advice to executors not competent and reasonably careful / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, section 12(a) / injunction sought due to executors exercising power of sale without unanimous beneficiary consent / whether lawyers’ failed to give competent advice / Committee ordered over $43,000 compensation / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3 / rule 7.1 / HELD / dysfunctional relationship between lawyers / one lawyer failed to give advice about Deed of Family Arrangement and consequences of lack of unanimous beneficiary consent / failed to pass on information to executors / no systemic issue in law firm / speculative that advice caused losses, compensation reversed / Committee’s decision modified / section 211(1)(a)
  23. LCRO 90/2016 FL v WZ (15 August 2019) [PDF, 196 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / employment relations dispute / complaint lawyer failed to follow instructions, obtain important documents, respond to inquiries,  disclose a close personal relationship, and concealed documents / HELD / Auckland Standards Committee 3 v Castles [2013] NZLCDT 53 / lawyer pursued all available avenues / no persistent failure to respond to or communicate with client / no evidence establishes close personal relationship / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  24. LCRO 67/2019 QN v WM and FR (8 August 2019) [PDF, 102 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / estate matter / complaint lawyers disclosed documents without instructions, and were slow in replying to requests / complaint motivated by court proceedings / HELD / no evidence of inappropriate disclosure or not acting promptly / review application discloses no reasonable cause of action and is an abuse of process / application for review struck out / section 205(1)(a) and section 205(1)(d)
  25. LCRO 65/2019 PT v [Area] Standards Committee [X] [PDF, 164 KB]

    Review / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / complaint lawyer emailed copy of another partner’s Standards Committee determination to personal email / own motion inquiry following confidential report / whether information confidential / HELD / under ss 158(2A) and 213(2A) of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, determinations and reviews are given to related persons / practitioners in partnership are related persons / Committee’s determination information confidential  not accepted / lawyer did not misuse document / Committee’s decision modified / section 211(1)(a)