You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.

Helpful search tips:

  • If you are looking for a specific decision with a forward slash in the title (eg, 123/2014), you will need to replace the forward slash with a space (eg, 123 2014), as the website cannot pick up on forward slashes (/) or any other characters.
  • If you are doing a keyword search (eg. misconduct), please note that this search will only produce decisions where the keyword appears in the title or decision description. If you want to search the entire decision document for certain keywords, you will need to use full website search located in the top right hand corner of this page.
  • If you want to search for a decision from a particular jurisdiction using the full website search, put both the jurisdiction name and the keyword in the search field (eg, LCRO misconduct).
Search results

1424 items matching your search terms

  1. LCRO 50/2017 TG v JT and TAP LIMITED (26 January 2018) [PDF, 292 KB]

    Review / Committee required production of a letter / Evidence Act 2006 section 51 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 section 151 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 rule 8.7 / Without Prejudice privilege / B v Auckland District Law Society [2004] 1 NZLR 326 (PC) / Complaints Assessment Committee v Medical Practioner’s Disciplinary Tribunal [2006] NZSC 48, [2006] 3 NZLR 577 / Cutts v Head [1984] Ch 290 (CA) / Unilever PLC v Proctor and Gamble Co [2000] 1 WLR 2436 (CA) / HELD / Committee can require production of “without privilege” communication / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  6. LCRO 159/2017 YB v WD [PDF, 147 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaints / property purchase / private sale / heat smart loan / complaint respondent did not advise on the loan / complaint over delays in response / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 rule 3 / rule 7 / rule 7.1 / HELD / no evidence on loan advice / applicants did not request a LIM / response delays reasonable / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a) 
  8. LCRO 126/2013 MZ v JK [PDF, 128 KB]

    Complaint / Committee found respondent’s conduct unsatisfactory / breach of undertaking / delay in response / not disclosing email / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 rule 10 / rule 10.1 / rule 10.3 / rule 11.1 / breach of undertaking / misleading and deceptive conduct / HELD / undertaking unclear / no undertaking / rule 11.1 does not apply / delays not unsatisfactory conduct / Committee’s decision reversed / section 211(1)(a)
  9. LCRO 139/2017 ML v OP QR [PDF, 290 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaints / respondent acted for applicant in property sale / fees complaint / complaint fees deducted from funds without authorisation / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 section 110(1)(b) / section 113(2) / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 rule 9.1 / rule 9.3 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Trust Account) Regulation 2008 regulation 9 / Heslop v Cousins [2007] 3 NZLR 679 (CA) / Shand v MJ Atkinson Ltd (in liq) [1966] NZLR 551 (CA) / A v Z LCRO 40/2009 (29 May 2009) / lien over funds / authority to deduct fees / HELD / fees fair and reasonable / no authority to deduct fees / no lien over funds / funds held for particular purpose / unsatisfactory conduct / Committee’s decision modified / section 211(1)(a) 
  10. LCRO 43/2016 XZ v QW [PDF, 209 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaints / fee estimate / overcharged fees / incompetent advice / applicant not informed about risks / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 rule 3 / rule 7.1 / rule 9.1 / rule 9.4 / Milnathort v Rhayader LCRO 140/09 (23 November 2009) / HELD / applicant kept informed / advice competent / fees fair and reasonable / estimate not required / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)