You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.
Helpful search tips:
1392 items matching your search terms
Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / applicant wants respondent to carry out instructions / respondent requires security for fees / HELD / respondent not instructed / applicant able to seek another lawyer / no power to force respondent to act / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / respondent acted in family court proceedings / complaint that matter not straightforward / failure to advise / HELD / complaints unsupported by evidence / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
Complaint / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / JN’s lawyer / J charged weekly rate / Jensen v Calver LCRO 55/2015 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 rule 13.3 / failure to appear / failure to place funds in trust account / failure to render final account / acting without instructions / HELD / J had arranged for agent to appear / conduct otherwise unsatisfactory / fine reduced / Committee’s decision modified / section 211(1)(a)
Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care Rules) 2008 rule 2.3 / rule 2.7 / rule 12 / respondent sent letter to applicant’s father / letter threatened legal action / letter included correspondence from the applicant / applicant’s privacy / letter improper use of legal threat / HELD / no duty of confidentiality to applicant’s / duty to carry out instructions / letter not improper threat / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaints / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care Rules) 2008 rule 1.2 / rule 7 / rule 8 / rule 8.1 / rule 8.4 / applicant contacted respondent’s office for advice / check revealed former partner of applicant previous client of respondent / respondent disclosed call to former client / duty to disclose / whether retainer existed / HELD / no disclosure required to former client / breach of rule 8.1 / unsatisfactory conduct / Committee’s decision reversed / section 211(1)(a)
Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaints / purchase of a property / complaint lawyer failed to act competently / fee complaint / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3.10 / rule 9 / rule 9.6 / whether there was an estimate of fees / retainer prior to 1 August 2008 / HELD / lawyer encouraged to use interim accounts in the future / fees fair and reasonable / estimate was not a quote / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / employment dispute / complaint lawyer failed to treat applicant with respect and courtesy / lawyer had failed to give applicant money / HELD / lawyer apologised for PA’s email / applicant not entitled to money / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / debt recovery / applicant engaged Baycorp / lawyer acted for Baycorp / complaint lawyer did not act in a timely manner / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 12 / third party duties / HELD / limited duties owed to third parties / no conduct issues arise / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / construction dispute / matter went to arbitration / complaint lawyer failed to treat applicant with respect and courtesy / lawyer had disclosed confidential information / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 10.1 / HELD / lawyer acting on instructions from client / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / complaint lawyer failed to pay child support / HELD / conduct unconnected with provision of regulated services / Office not correct forum for complaint / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaints / company placed into receivership / lawyer acted for bank / complaint lawyer did not look at documentation when ordering liquidation / HELD / lawyer owes not duties to applicant / Office has no jurisdiction to consider complaints / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / complaint lawyer failed to serve notice of arbitration / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 10.2 / HELD / lawyer had a duty not to communicate directly with another lawyer’s client / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaints / complaint lawyer had a conflict of interest / complaint lawyer was dishonest and misleading / some complaints assessed under the Law Practitioners Act 1982 / matter when to arbitration / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 6.1 / rule 6.1.1 / whether there was a more than negligible risk of a conflict of interests/ HELD / negligible risk of a conflict of interests / no evidence that lawyer had been dishonest or misleading / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / dispute over trust / complaint lawyer about how the lawyer administered the trust / fee complaint / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 9 / HELD / applicant not client of the lawyer / lawyer has different duties when acting as a trustee / no professional standards issues arise / fees fair and reasonable / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / will dispute / complaint lawyer intituled documents incorrectly / conflict of interests / intituling complaint subject of an earlier complaint / HELD / no jurisdiction to consider intituling complaint / conflict of interests / complaint without merit / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / property purchase / another lawyer from the same firm acted for the vendor / complaint lawyer did not explain the agreement to the applicant / conflict of interest / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006, section 361(1) / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3.4 / rule 3.5 / rule 3.10 / rule 7 / rule 7.1 / rule 8 / rule 8.1 / Campbeltown v Dunoon LCRO 129/2009 (11 November 2009) / conduct prior to 1 August 2008 / informed consent / duty to obtain client’s instructions / HELD / conflict of interest does not breach previous standards / failure to obtain instructions and consult with clients a breach of previous and current rules / unsatisfactory conduct / Committee’s decision reversed / section 211(1)(a)
Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / relationship property dispute / complaint lawyer failed to advise applicant properly / fee complaint / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 9 / HELD / no professional standards issues arise / fees fair and reasonable / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / relationship property dispute / complaint lawyer failed to advise applicant properly / fee complaint / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 9 / HELD / no professional standards issues arise / fees fair and reasonable / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
Review / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / breach of undertaking / lawyer mislaid an item that they had undertaken to return promptly / Evidence Regulations 2007, regulation 26 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 10.3 / HELD / lawyer accepts that the undertaking had been breached / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaints / dispute over termination of lease / complaint lawyer failed to act competently / refused to follow instructions that were outside his field of expertise / failed to promote the client’s interests / fee complaint / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 4 / rule 6 / HELD / no evidence for complaints / no professional standards issues arise / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
Review / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / lawyer breached security at the District Court cells / lawyer misrepresented that another person was a probation officer / knowingly facilitated a prohibited meeting / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 12 / duty for a lawyer to conduct dealings with others with integrity, respect and courtesy / HELD / serious allegation / evidence does not meet high standard of proof / Committee’s decision reversed / section 211(1)(a)
Decision dated 02/08/17
Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaint / relationship property dispute / client complained about fees / fees held to be fair and reasonable / lawyer commenced proceedings to recover fees / complaint that lawyer breached agreement not to commence proceedings / Auckland Standards Committee 3 of the New Zealand Law Society v W [2011] 3 NZLR 117 (HC) / whether lawyer breached undertaking not to commence proceedings / HELD / Committee and LCRO do not have the power to order a lawyer to withdraw proceedings / undertaking not provided / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
Review / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / own motion investigation / liquidation of companies / lawyer acting for client and clients parents / conflict of interests / failure to ensure parties had independent legal advice / inadequate terms of engagement / poor communication / failure to confirm instructions / fees not fair and reasonable / breach of Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 6 / rule 6.1 / rule 7 / rule 7.1 / rule 11.3 / whether client was agent of parents / HELD / act has focus on consumer protection / lawyer should have communicated directly with parents / fees not fair and reasonable / publication ordered / Committee’s decision otherwise modified / section 211(1)(a)
Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaints / relationship property dispute / mediated settlement / lawyer had not initially acted for client / complaint lawyer had not acted in clients best interests / fee complaint / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3.4 / rule 9 / rule 9.4 / whether fee estimate had been provided / HELD / lawyer acted according to instructions / estimate not provided / fees fair and reasonable / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)