You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
Some jurisdictions only publish a selection of decisions. Identifying details may be removed.

Helpful search tips:

  • If you are looking for a specific decision with a forward slash in the title (eg, 123/2014), you will need to replace the forward slash with a space (eg, 123 2014), as the website cannot pick up on forward slashes (/) or any other characters.
  • If you are doing a keyword search (eg. misconduct), please note that this search will only produce decisions where the keyword appears in the title or decision description. If you want to search the entire decision document for certain keywords, you will need to use full website search located in the top right hand corner of this page.
  • If you want to search for a decision from a particular jurisdiction using the full website search, put both the jurisdiction name and the keyword in the search field (eg, LCRO misconduct).
Search results

1387 items matching your search terms

  2. LCRO 116/2017 GC v KM (31 May 2018) [PDF, 420 KB]

    Complaint / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / fees not fair and reasonable / failure to keep client informed / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3 / rule 3.2 / rule 3.4 / rule 3.5 / rule 7 / rule 7.1 / rule 7.2 / rule 9 / rule 9.1 / competence / terms of engagement / enduring power of attorney / cash-out clause / HELD / fees fair and reasonable / client kept informed / Committee’s decision reversed / section 211(1)(a)
  3. LCRO 168/2016 WT v MD (30 May 2018) [PDF, 269 KB]

    Complaint / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / failure to use up-to-date statute / advice incompetent / fees not fair and reasonable / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3 / rule 4.2.3 / rule 9 / withdrawing from retainer / HELD / fees reasonable / client given reasonable time to terminate retainer / advice competent / failure to use up-to-date statute unsatisfactory / Committee’s decision modified / section 211(1)(a)
  5. LCRO 152/2017 CS v GB (22 May 2018) [PDF, 248 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaints / relationship property dispute / complaint lawyer discourteous / no terms of engagement / protection of confidential information / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 3.1 / rule 3.4 / rule 3.5 / rule 7 / rule 7.1 / rule 8 / work of significant nature / HELD / no significant work carried out / no breach of confidence /  no evidence to determine other issues / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  6. LCRO 122/2015 NP v AO (21 May 2018) [PDF, 178 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaints / will dispute / lawyer acted for will maker / complaint lawyer failed to respond in timely manner / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 8 / rule 12 / rule 12.1 / confidentiality / duties owed to third parties / HELD / limited duties owed to third parties / no obligation to advise complainant / Committee’s decision modified / section 211(1)(a)
  13. LCRO 178-2016 KO v RT [PDF, 262 KB]

    Complaint / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / failure to respond to enquiry / complaint estimate exceeded / refusal to accept service / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 rule 10.1 / rule 12 / R v D LCRO 56/2009 (19 June 2009) / IO v SJ LCRO 54/2010 (1 February 2012) / duties owed to third parties / respect and courtesy / HELD / no evidence that initial enquiry not responded to / lack of other responses unsatisfactory conduct / Committee’s decision modified / section 211(1)(a) 
  14. LCRO 176/2016+193/2016 RQ and TS v VU [PDF, 220 KB]

    Review / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / complaint about administration of estate / misleading information / failure to respond to emails / Taylor v Schofield Peterson [1993] 3 NZLR 641 (PC) / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008, rule 10 / independent advice when complaint raised / management of file / HELD / lawyer misled complainants / no independent advice to complainants / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)
  20. LCRO 217/2017 PY v SD [PDF, 395 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaints / complaint over enduring power of attorney / capacity to create power of attorney / lack of independent witness / Protection of Personal Property Rights Act 1988 section 94A / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 rule 3 / rule 6 / conflict of interest / HELD / lawyer not independent witness / unsatisfactory conduct / acted competently regarding capacity / Committee’s decision modified / section 211(1)(a)
  23. LCRO 264/2016 YQ v VG [PDF, 174 KB]

    Complaint / Committee declined to take further action on complaints / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 section 6 / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 rule 2.3 / rule 2.7 / rule 13.5 / lawyer conducting investigations for client / HELD / lawyer providing legal work / limited obligation to third party / no improper purpose or threats / lawyer independent in litigation / Committee’s decision confirmed / section 211(1)(a)  DT
  24. LCRO 138/2015 AZ, VY and CX v DW and EV [PDF, 260 KB]

    Complaint / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / complaint lawyer inadequately supervised / fee complaint / failure to advise / complaint about conduct of litigation / Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 rule 4.4.2 / rule 4.4.4 / rule 9 / rule 11.3 / rule 13.4 / rule 14.13 / rule 14.15.3 / failure to transfer files / failure to carry out work on files / alternatives to litigation / HELD / no failure to supervise lawyer / work ceased due to non-payment of fees / no undertaking to pay firms fees / Committee’s decision reversed / section 211(1)(a)  DT(OV)
  25. LCRO 57/2014 IW v PP [PDF, 279 KB]

    Complaint / Committee found unsatisfactory conduct / fee complaint / Committee ordered fee reduction / review only of unsatisfactory conduct / both parties support reversing of unsatisfactory conduct / Chapman v Legal Complaints Review Officer [2015] NZHC 1500 / Maguire v Manawatu Standards Committee [2016] NZHC 1052 / HELD / fees already refunded / views of complainant relevant / no broader issues arise / Committee’s decision reversed / section 211(1)(a)  RM (RH)