Lolesio complaint - no longer suitable to be a COA holder as illegally in NZ - COA suspended until evidence of holding appropriate work visa
You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
For related District Court decisions refer to the District Court website.
376 items matching your search terms
Lolesio complaint - no longer suitable to be a COA holder as illegally in NZ - COA suspended until evidence of holding appropriate work visa
Police v Talagi complaint – assaulted a youth while working as a security guard- misconduct – COA cancelled
Police v Tanevesi complaint – unprovoked attack on 2 15 years olds while working in security - misconduct – COA cancelled.
Police v Koloofai – disqualifying conviction of violence – COA cancelled.
Complaint of racial profiling and intimidation against a security guard had no evidential basis – complaint found to be vexatious and frivolous and dismissed.
Zhou complaint – disqualifying conviction and gang association – no longer suitable to hold a COA – COA cancelled.
Complaint upheld – breach sections 23, 44 & 45 – providing restricted security services without appropriate certification and licensing – employed crowd controllers without COAs
Police v Fulutusi – disqualifying convictions of obtaining by deception after being a middleman in a financial scam – no longer suitable to work in security – COA cancelled.
Dullat complaint – no longer suitable to be a COA holder as unlawfully in NZ and subject to deportation – COA cancelled.
Police complaint – security company – upheld – unsatisfactory conduct – failure to adequately train and supervise employees – reprimanded – ss 43, 74, 78
Complaint by police relating to gang membership – no evidence of gang association since March 2022 – Complaint dismissed as COA holder had left the Tribesman before his COA was granted.
Gray complaint - on character grounds following convictions for trespass and wilful damage. Further offence of dishonesty after complaint file – no longer suitable to be a security worker – COA cancelled.
Police v Pandya complaint – disqualifying conviction a mandatory ground for cancellation under s 82 – COA cancelled.
Member of the public complaint – working without a COA – employing non-certified crowd controllers – complaint upheld – warning provided – ss 11,19,44,45,75 – CIPU report
Police complaint upheld – unsatisfactory conduct – conditions to be attached to COA – failure to allow Police entry – supervision required – ss 4, 74, 81, 96C
Member of the public complaint regarding a private investigator – complaint upheld – private investigator reprimanded – finding of unsatisfactory conduct – flaws in process – ss 4,73, 96C of the Act
Application for an individual licence declined after convictions for obtaining by deception and offences under the PSPPI Act of working as an unlicenced security consultant and personal guard – continued failure to comply with responsibilities of a security business owner – not suitable to be a licence holder.
Police complaint upheld – COA cancelled – disqualifying factors and concerning interactions with Police – ss 62 & 74
Police v Schwenke - complaint that COA holder no longer suitable to be a security worker following a conviction for wilful damage (family violence) and being trespassed from a school. No grounds for disqualification - Complaint upheld - Final warning and conditions attached to COA for further training and not coming to police attention again.
Complaint against COA holder - complaint upheld - multiple breaches of the Act substantiated - no longer of suitable character - found guilty of misconduct - reprimand - barred from applying again - ss 23,45,62,69,70, 74, 75, 81, 83, 114
Complaint that company was employing security technicians without COAs established – company accepted it had failed and implemented new policies and procedures to prevent further breaches – warning given and complaint closed.
Complaint that Private Investigator was guilty of misconduct by misleading people into thinking he was working for Ministry of Justice and passing on private information – Introduction misleading but did not amount to misconduct – evidence insufficient to establish PI passed on personal information to third parties, if he had it would at least have been unsatisfactory conduct.
GM Security Services Contractor Limited & Papaliitele – continual breaches of the Act – licence and COA suspended until annual returns filed.
Complaint that PI carrying out an investigation in breach of a Restraining and Harmful Digital Communication Order – failure to carry our due diligence when taking instructions did not amount to unsatisfactory conduct as no information passed on in breach of the order.
Police objection – gang membership – sections 28 & 53(3) – being a patched member of the Head Hunters is incongruous with the background and character requirements of a security worker – application for COA declined.