Appeal / real estate agency advertised motel with drone photographs including appellant’s neighbouring property / appellant complained of privacy invasion, unsatisfied with principal agent’s response / Committee took no further action / Real Estates Agents Act 2008, s3, s4 s111 / Professional Rules 2012, r5.1, r5.2 / HELD / no evidence of privacy breach, listing photographs considered innocuous / concerns addressed by removing and blacking out photographs / photographs removed when motel sold / alleged false and misleading information in principal agent’s response to complaint was careless language rather than deliberate misstatement / email inferred necessary consents were obtained, but no consents needed / marketing and photography are real estate agency work / no breach of professional rules or unsatisfactory conduct / appeal dismissed / Committee’s decision confirmed
- Family Court
- Care of Children
- Family Violence
- Kaiārahi - Family Court Navigators
- Separation & divorce
- Keeping children safe
- Relationship property
- Paternity & Child Support
- Adoption & the Family Court
- Challenge a will
- Change the sex/gender on a birth certificate
- Civil restraint orders to prevent meritless cases
- Powers to make decisions for others
- Court ordered treatment
- Information for lawyers & service providers
- Get consent to marry if you’re aged 16 or 17
- How the Family Court can help donor-conceived people
- Litigant Abuse Orders