You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
For related District Court decisions refer to the District Court website.
-
Complaint of misconduct after the COA holder yelled at neighbors while carrying an axe - incident unrelated to work in private security - police attended but no charges laid - actions whole wrong and foolish do not amount to misconduct or unsatisfactory conduct.
-
Police v Brandt - series of aggressive and bizarre behavior establishes unsuitability to be a security worker - COA suspended with conditions to be met to have it reinstated.
-
Police v Vaga - serious of serious charges resulting in remand in custody - no longer suitable to be a certificate holder - COA cancelled.
-
Police v Uaisele - no longer suitable to be a certificate holder - COA cancelled
-
Police complaint based on gang membership - Evidence of gang membership for only a short period and has now left the gang - complaint dismissed with caution
-
Police v Reddy complaint – recent disqualifying convictions – COA cancelled.
-
Police v Sadat - potentially disqualifying charges and warrants for arrests due to failure to turn up to court - no longer suitable to be a certificate holder - COA expired so order made baring reapplication for 2 years.
-
Member of the public complaint upheld - misconduct found - providing a security services business without holding an individual license - ss 23. 44, 45(2), 74, 75(2), 77, 92
-
Complaint re Baker - breach of the Act by working as a security consultant without a license or COA - misconduct established - condition placed on COA and reprimand.
-
Complaint re South Security Limited - engaging workers without COAs is a contravention of the Act and therefore misconduct - penalty reprimand and warning re-future breaches.
-
Police v Lauago - complaint based on disqualifying convictions - certificate cancelled by consent.
-
*
-
Police v Biddle complaint - no longer suitable to be a COA holder because of gang association and intimidating behavior - COA cancelled
-
Police v Edmonds - complaint based on disqualifying convictions - no application for waiver - COA cancelled
-
Police v Tupai Ui - complaint based on convictions and prison sentence - COA cancelled
-
Complaint of misconduct - Investigation did not find any supporting evidence - complaint dismissed.
-
Police v Lockington - assault while working as a security guard - COA cancelled.
-
Police v Zeller - complaint based on disqualifying convictions and sentences - COA cancelled.
-
Police v Saini - Complaint following convictions for serious offending and lengthy prison sentence - multiple grounds for disqualification - COA cancelled.
-
Lauesi complaint - working in security without a COA - Final warning given
-
Police v Sataraka - complaint based on series anti-social aggressive behavior - No longer suitable to be a security worker - COA suspended with directions on what is needed to get suspension lifted.
-
Police v Grayling - disqualifying convictions and multiple convictions for fictious calls to emergency services - no longer suitable to work in security - COA cancelled.
-
Leaupepe Rehearing - conduct not in course of work - one off out of character event does not amount to misconduct - unsatisfactory conduct established - no further penalty
-
Police v Love - police complaint based on repeated traffic infringements, driving convictions and warrants to arrest - final warning given further infringement will result in suspension of COA.
-
Police complaint - Misconduct - excessive force in restraint - conditions imposed - ss 4, 74, 81, 96 of the Act