You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
For related District Court decisions refer to the District Court website.
-
Police v Kimura complaint - convictions for offences of dishonesty & remanded in custody for breaching sentence of home detention - COA cancelled
-
Police v Walid - Disqualifying convictions - further serious drug charges - remanded in custody - COA cancelled
-
Police complaints against Adeosun - failure to wear security ID a contravention of the Act and therefore misconduct - penalty reprimand and further training
-
Turner & Waihape complaint - operating a security business without the required licence is misconduct - penalty reprimand and further training.
-
Police v Hale – Patched member of Highway 61 MC and captainof local chapter – no longer suitable to be a COA holder – COA cancelled.
-
Lolesio complaint - no longer suitable to be a COA holder as illegally in NZ - COA suspended until evidence of holding appropriate work visa
-
Police v Talagi complaint – assaulted a youth while working as a security guard- misconduct – COA cancelled
-
Police v Tanevesi complaint – unprovoked attack on 2 15 years olds while working in security - misconduct – COA cancelled.
-
Police v Koloofai – disqualifying conviction of violence – COA cancelled.
-
Complaint of racial profiling and intimidation against a security guard had no evidential basis – complaint found to be vexatious and frivolous and dismissed.
-
Zhou complaint – disqualifying conviction and gang association – no longer suitable to hold a COA – COA cancelled.
-
Complaint upheld – breach sections 23, 44 & 45 – providing restricted security services without appropriate certification and licensing – employed crowd controllers without COAs
-
Police v Fulutusi – disqualifying convictions of obtaining by deception after being a middleman in a financial scam – no longer suitable to work in security – COA cancelled.
-
Dullat complaint – no longer suitable to be a COA holder as unlawfully in NZ and subject to deportation – COA cancelled.
-
Police complaint – security company – upheld – unsatisfactory conduct – failure to adequately train and supervise employees – reprimanded – ss 43, 74, 78
-
Complaint by police relating to gang membership – no evidence of gang association since March 2022 – Complaint dismissed as COA holder had left the Tribesman before his COA was granted.
-
Gray complaint - on character grounds following convictions for trespass and wilful damage. Further offence of dishonesty after complaint file – no longer suitable to be a security worker – COA cancelled.
-
Police v Pandya complaint – disqualifying conviction a mandatory ground for cancellation under s 82 – COA cancelled.
-
Member of the public complaint – working without a COA – employing non-certified crowd controllers – complaint upheld – warning provided – ss 11,19,44,45,75 – CIPU report
-
Police complaint upheld – unsatisfactory conduct – conditions to be attached to COA – failure to allow Police entry – supervision required – ss 4, 74, 81, 96C
-
Member of the public complaint regarding a private investigator – complaint upheld – private investigator reprimanded – finding of unsatisfactory conduct – flaws in process – ss 4,73, 96C of the Act
-
Application for an individual licence declined after convictions for obtaining by deception and offences under the PSPPI Act of working as an unlicenced security consultant and personal guard – continued failure to comply with responsibilities of a security business owner – not suitable to be a licence holder.
-
Police complaint upheld – COA cancelled – disqualifying factors and concerning interactions with Police – ss 62 & 74
-
Police v Schwenke - complaint that COA holder no longer suitable to be a security worker following a conviction for wilful damage (family violence) and being trespassed from a school. No grounds for disqualification - Complaint upheld - Final warning and conditions attached to COA for further training and not coming to police attention again.
-
Complaint against COA holder - complaint upheld - multiple breaches of the Act substantiated - no longer of suitable character - found guilty of misconduct - reprimand - barred from applying again - ss 23,45,62,69,70, 74, 75, 81, 83, 114