You can search by selecting a jurisdiction, a keyword (for example a name) or browse by year.
For related District Court decisions refer to the District Court website.
-
MOP Complaint – providing security services without the appropriate license to do so – ss3, 5,9,10,23, 67, 73, 74, 81, 83 &96 – reprimand – individual license issued – publication
-
Wood complaint – running a property guard business clamping cars without a licence, failing to wear ID or produce on response – misconduct established – penalty adjourned to be considered at time of likely company licence application.
-
Objection based on gang membership – being a patched member of the Mongrel Mob is inconsistent with background and character requirements – application for a certificate declined and temporary certificate cancelled.
-
Minute of outcome of complaint by Indigo Ltd v Isacorp Ltd – complaint dismissed – suppression order in relation to substantive decision.
-
Complaint by a member of the public – ss 73 & 74 of the Act – regarding the processes of private investigators – expert evidence – potentially vexatious complaint – complaint dismissed
-
Singh complaint – convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment with 17 year non parole period – COA cancelled
-
Member of public complaint – CIPU investigation – no COA held – no company license held
-
Complaint that security guard is no longer suitable to be a security worker on health grounds – complaint proved – suspension of COA extended with ability to apply for suspension to be lifted once health issues addressed.
-
Complaint that security guard failed to provide certificate number and was aggressive and abusive – referred to CIPU to establish identify of security guard and investigate complaint – insufficient evidence of breach of the Act or unsatisfactory conduct – complaint dismissed
-
Police Objection - company licence - COA - approved on condition - conviction for violence - Police history - ss62, 63
-
Complaint upheld - COA cancelled - conviction for violence - failure to engage with Authority - ss62, 74
-
Complaint - criminal history - convictions for violence - imprisonment - ss28, 62, 74 & 82 - COA approved on condition
-
Nia Nia - complaint against a COA holder of operating security business without a licence - contravention of Act ongoing despite being advised of obligations - no longer suitable to be a certificate holder - COA cancelled.
-
Requirements for security workers to wear ID under s67 - guidelines on s64(4) exemption and what constitutes a reasonable belief of threat to safety.
-
Complaint upheld - COA cancelled - violence convictions - ss62, 74, 77
-
Complaint upheld - ss62,74,77 - assault charge - decision on papers
-
Signal Complaint - Contravening the Act by working with a COA in incorrect classes is misconduct - misleading time sheets & misuse of company vehicle - COA cancelled.
-
3 Complaints upheld - charges of assault & kidnapping - failure to engage with the Authority - ss62, 74, 80
-
Tigers Express Security and Raymond Deane complaint - various breaches of the Act established which amount to misconduct - penalty decision adjourned for 2 months to allow for company to be sold or restructured - if not licence likely to be cancelled.
-
Stephens Police complaint - disqualifying conviction of receiving stolen property - no longer suitable to be a certificate holder - COA cancelled.
-
Complaint re Legion Security Ltd & Antonio Pailate - running security business without a licence & engaging security worker without a COA - warning given and conditions set for COA to be renewed and requirement for a company licence.
-
Complaint upheld – misconduct – failure to hold a company license – employment of security staff without COAs – ss 23, 45, 73, 74, 83 – formal reprimand – conditions attached to company license
-
Police complaint – provision of false information – s74 – COA to be subject to condition
-
Packer complaint - working as crowd controller without COA - allegations of assault while working as a crowd controller - Decision on prosecution under the Act and any application for a certificate deferred until after criminal charges have been determined.
-
Dubble H Security Ltd’s application for a company licence – Creelman complaint – no evidence of 12 months experience for company licence & continued breaches of the Act – not suitable to carry on a security business – company application declined and COA further suspended – final warning.