Search Results

1. Langdon v ACC [2014] NZACA 9 [pdf, 71 KB]

   ...equipment i.e. clothing, Bed and bedding, Motel etc meals when delivering by road. Driving allowance all supplied by the company. Course and examination fees for all required licences and certificates.” [28] Mr Langdon described the full range of costs and allowances paid by the company for him to attend the Commercial Launchmasters course in Auckland and listed a range of allowances that come within the General Allowances in the Award, including shift and weekend pays and allowan...

2. [2016] NZEmpC 137 Bennett and Others v Michaels and Others [pdf, 179 KB]

   ...Auckland 207. (i) That interest be imposed on outstanding wages at the prescribed rate by the Judicature Act 1908; (j) Compensation for each plaintiff in the amount of $30,000.00; (k) Any other relief the Court deems fit to grant; (l) Costs. Procedural issues [4] At the Authority’s investigation meeting on 17 July 2015, Mr Michaels appeared and represented himself and the other respondents. When the papers commencing the challenge were served on Mr Michaels...

3. Najib v CAC 403 & Lindsay [2016] NZREADT 51 [pdf, 232 KB]

   ...orders decision).2 The Committee censured Mr Najib and ordered him to pay a fine of $2,000. The Committee also ordered publication of Mr Najib’s name and the Agency he worked for at the time of the conduct. [2] On 24 August 2015 Mr Najib filed a Notice of Appeal against the Committee’s decision as to publication. He has not appealed against the Committee’s substantive finding of unsatisfactory conduct, or the order for censure and fine. [3] Mr Najib applied for an interi...

4. [2006] NZEmpC AC 50/06 Tu'itupou v Guardian Healthcare Operations Ltd [pdf, 134 KB]

   ...decided in this matter. The plaintiff, Mrs Tu’itupou has commenced a challenge de novo against a decision of the Employment Relations Authority (“the Authority”) dated 3 May 2006. The first issue is whether the alleged personal grievance was filed with the Authority within 3 years of raising the grievance as is required by s114(6) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (“the Act”). If the personal grievance was not filed with the Authority within the 3 year period then th...

5. WC VB UA v WC VB UA LCRO 189/2012, 184/2014, 180/2012 & 190/2012 (10 September 2015) [pdf, 83 KB]

   ...review of the determination by the Standards Committee in which the Committee made a finding of unsatisfactory conduct against Mr WC. The Committee censured Mr WC, imposed a fine of $1,000 in respect of each complaint, and ordered him to pay $1,000 costs to the New Zealand Law Society in respect of each complaint. [2] The Committee declined to order Mr WC to pay compensation to the complainants and did not order publication of his name. [3] The Standards Committee determination...

6. LCRO 204/2021 UX v AK (28 April 2022) [pdf, 162 KB]

   ...that ‘cutting corners’ can create unnecessary issues, especially in tensely fought litigation”. [27] To mark what it concluded was Mrs AK’s deviation from best practice, the Committee directed that Mrs AK make modest contribution to the costs of the Committee’s investigation. Application for review [28] Mr UX filed an application for review on 17 December 2021. [29] He submits that: (a) Mrs AK had misled the Law Society in providing response to his complaint; and (...

7. 2021-05-26 Transcript (up until 3.15pm on day 32) [pdf, 2.4 MB]

   ...understanding the suite of permits that apply to 30 4 OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL v NGA RUNANGA & Ors NOE ENV DUNEDIN - (17 May 2021) each of them, so a list of dams was sent through to Mr Page. Over the weekend there has been a supplementary brief filed by Mr Curran that deals with the Falls Dam and within that brief there is some information about the suite of consents relating to that particular dam, that evidence deals with some other things as well but – 5 Q. Yes, yes....

8. 2021-05-26 Transcript (up until 3.15pm on day 32) [pdf, 2.4 MB]

   ...understanding the suite of permits that apply to 30 4 OTAGO REGIONAL COUNCIL v NGA RUNANGA & Ors NOE ENV DUNEDIN - (17 May 2021) each of them, so a list of dams was sent through to Mr Page. Over the weekend there has been a supplementary brief filed by Mr Curran that deals with the Falls Dam and within that brief there is some information about the suite of consents relating to that particular dam, that evidence deals with some other things as well but – 5 Q. Yes, yes....

9. [2019] NZEmpC 192 Johnson v Chief of the New Zealand Defence Force [pdf, 394 KB]

   ...proof he had not sent the email; failing to investigate the issue properly; concluding it was most likely he had sent it, and then losing trust in him; orchestrating the 22 March 2018 decision-letter so as to reduce the chance of being liable for costs; and then issuing a decision-letter in those terms. e) Alternatively, NZDF had breached its statutory duties of good faith and/or implied duty of fair treatment. f) On either basis he was entitled to remedies. [70] For NZDF, Mr...

10. [2022] NZEnvC 167 MTP Limited v Westland District Council [pdf, 324 KB]

    ..._______________________________________________________________ A: Under section 313(a) of the Resource Management Act 1991, the application is granted insofar as the declaration sought is made at [65]. ~ ~ . ' . . . --co u ~ 2 B: Costs are reserved and a timetable set. REASONS Introduction [1] Westland District Council granted subdivision consent and a land use consent to MTP Limited for the subdivision and development of land for rural- residential purposes at Haas...